-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Backport to branch(3.9) : Fix status code handling #341
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @feeblefakie, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on refining the system's error handling by ensuring that specific internal status codes are accurately translated into their corresponding gRPC status codes. This enhancement improves the clarity and robustness of error reporting, particularly for scenarios involving invalid arguments and missing secrets, by aligning them with standard gRPC error representations. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly maps the INVALID_ARGUMENT and SECRET_NOT_FOUND status codes to their corresponding gRPC statuses. The changes are straightforward and logically sound. While the code change itself is good, I recommend adding unit tests for these new mappings in CommonServiceTest.java. This would improve test coverage and help prevent future regressions, especially since the private convert method is not directly tested.
| case CONTRACT_CONTEXTUAL_ERROR: | ||
| case UNLOADABLE_FUNCTION: | ||
| case INVALID_FUNCTION: | ||
| case INVALID_ARGUMENT: | ||
| return io.grpc.Status.INVALID_ARGUMENT; | ||
| case CERTIFICATE_NOT_FOUND: | ||
| case CONTRACT_NOT_FOUND: | ||
| case ASSET_NOT_FOUND: | ||
| case FUNCTION_NOT_FOUND: | ||
| case SECRET_NOT_FOUND: | ||
| return io.grpc.Status.NOT_FOUND; | ||
| case CERTIFICATE_ALREADY_REGISTERED: | ||
| case SECRET_ALREADY_REGISTERED: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This switch statement is becoming quite long. With these additions, it's a good time to consider a future refactoring. Using a Map<StatusCode, io.grpc.Status> could make these mappings more declarative and improve maintainability as more status codes are added. This is a suggestion for future improvement and not a blocker for this PR.
This is an automated backport of the following:
Please merge this PR after all checks have passed.