-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Fix status code handling #323
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @jnmt, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refines the service's error handling by correctly mapping specific internal status codes to their appropriate gRPC equivalents. This ensures that clients receive more accurate and standardized error responses, improving the clarity and consistency of error interpretation, especially for issues related to invalid arguments and missing secrets. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly adds handling for INVALID_ARGUMENT and SECRET_NOT_FOUND status codes in the gRPC status conversion logic, preventing them from being incorrectly mapped to an INTERNAL error. My review includes one suggestion to improve code maintainability by keeping the case statements sorted numerically, which is consistent with the existing style in this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds mappings for two new status codes (INVALID_ARGUMENT and SECRET_NOT_FOUND) to the gRPC status conversion logic in the CommonService class. These status codes are mapped to their appropriate gRPC equivalents.
- Maps
INVALID_ARGUMENTtoio.grpc.Status.INVALID_ARGUMENT - Maps
SECRET_NOT_FOUNDtoio.grpc.Status.NOT_FOUND
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
feeblefakie
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thank you!
choplin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Sorry for the late review.
JFYI, we can make missing of an enum variant in a switch statment compile error using ErrorProne. This could help you avoid missing this type of error.
https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingCasesInEnumSwitch
@choplin Thanks! We've already used ErrorProne, but unfortunately, |
Description
This PR adds missing mapping from ScalarDL status code to gRPC status code. Although it doesn't cause a serious issue, i.e., showing warnings like "SECRET_NOT_FOUND is not mapped to gRPC status code" in a log, we should avoid it. I needed to care about it when adding the status code in #302.
Related issues and/or PRs
Changes made
Checklist
Additional notes (optional)
N/A
Release notes
Fixed status code handling.