fix(deps): bump hcancelik/pr-conflict-finder from 1.0.1 to 1.0.4

[dependabot]

Bumps hcancelik/pr-conflict-finder from 1.0.1 to 1.0.4.

Release notes

Sourced from hcancelik/pr-conflict-finder's releases.

v1.0.4

Update dependencies

v1.0.3

Update dependencies

v1.0.2

Include dependency updates

Commits

• 732ec38 Update dependencies
• d5f6408 Merge pull request #129 from hcancelik/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/eslint-8.25.0
• c953da5 Merge pull request #127 from hcancelik/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/actions/github...
• 503343e Bump eslint from 8.12.0 to 8.25.0
• 0026c37 Bump @​actions/github from 5.0.1 to 5.1.1
• 0c5b82d Merge pull request #131 from hcancelik/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/jest-29.2.1
• cf615b6 Merge pull request #126 from hcancelik/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/actions/core-1...
• 00e9368 Merge pull request #105 from hcancelik/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/vercel/ncc-0.34.0
• 3a09d2b Bump jest from 27.5.1 to 29.2.1
• d2a598a Bump @​actions/core from 1.6.0 to 1.10.0
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[dependabot]

Dependabot tried to add @GregoireF and @NicolasV as reviewers to this PR, but received the following error from GitHub:

POST https://api.github.com/repos/wr-projects/cz-changelog-wrprojects/pulls/161/requested_reviewers: 422 - Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the wr-projects/cz-changelog-wrprojects repository. // See: https://docs.github.com/rest/reference/pulls#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request

[pull-request-quantifier-deprecated]

This PR has 2 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

---

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -1
Percentile : 0.8%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.yml : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

• Fast and predictable releases to production:
  • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
    iterations.
  • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
• Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
  • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
  • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
• Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
  • Small portions can be assimilated better.
• Better engineering practices are exercised:
  • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
  • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

• Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
  • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
  • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
• Change your engineering behaviors
  • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
    • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
    • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

• One line was added: +1 -0
• One line was deleted: +0 -1
• One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
  interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
• Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
  of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

---

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}