Skip to content

Conversation

@jor2
Copy link
Member

@jor2 jor2 commented Dec 2, 2025

Description

Sysdig charts don't support passing an image tag to the digest field as we get:

http://icr.io/ext/sysdig/agent-kmodule@14.2.5@sha256:0345968a77f8eb64a00f2b06af3c40bf3df78d34125b46c9788a9e73f8ddbb1a

instead of:

icr.io/ext/sysdig/agent-kmodule:14.2.5@sha256:0345968a77f8eb64a00f2b06af3c40bf3df78d34125b46c9788a9e73f8ddbb1a

We need to maintain the version 14.2.5 for renovate automation, so instead we created a local that strips at the @ symbol from 14.2.5@sha256:0345968a77f8eb64a00f2b06af3c40bf3df78d34125b46c9788a9e73f8ddbb1a so we end up only passing sha256:0345968a77f8eb64a00f2b06af3c40bf3df78d34125b46c9788a9e73f8ddbb1a.

Release required?

  • No release
  • Patch release (x.x.X)
  • Minor release (x.X.x)
  • Major release (X.x.x)
Release notes content

Run the pipeline

If the CI pipeline doesn't run when you create the PR, the PR requires a user with GitHub collaborators access to run the pipeline.

Run the CI pipeline when the PR is ready for review and you expect tests to pass. Add a comment to the PR with the following text:

/run pipeline

Checklist for reviewers

  • If relevant, a test for the change is included or updated with this PR.
  • If relevant, documentation for the change is included or updated with this PR.

For mergers

  • Use a conventional commit message to set the release level. Follow the guidelines.
  • Include information that users need to know about the PR in the commit message. The commit message becomes part of the GitHub release notes.
  • Use the Squash and merge option.

@jor2 jor2 self-assigned this Dec 2, 2025
@jor2 jor2 requested a review from Aashiq-J as a code owner December 2, 2025 11:18
Copy link
Contributor

@ocofaigh ocofaigh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you are sure that this does not support passing an image tag (which is not the case for any of the other images used here) we should add variable validation to the input to only allow the digest format.

@jor2
Copy link
Member Author

jor2 commented Dec 2, 2025

@ocofaigh docs suggest they're both enabled by default jmx, app_checks. Perhaps they were at some point. But code looks like they're actually disabled here. app_checks will be deprecated soon btw:

We are sunsetting application checks in favor of [Monitoring Integrations](https://docs.sysdig.com/en/integration-library/).

Copy link
Contributor

@ocofaigh ocofaigh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see comments

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Contributor

ocofaigh commented Dec 3, 2025

/run pipeline

1 similar comment
@jor2
Copy link
Member Author

jor2 commented Dec 3, 2025

/run pipeline

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Contributor

ocofaigh commented Dec 4, 2025

The addons test failed during undeploy of the monitoring DA, however it didnt print the reason, and the workspace is gone. I have raised this with Daniel/Wesley. for now, will retry pipeline..
image

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Contributor

ocofaigh commented Dec 4, 2025

/run pipeline

@ocofaigh ocofaigh merged commit eb2d210 into main Dec 4, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@ocofaigh ocofaigh deleted the kmodule-bug branch December 4, 2025 10:02
@terraform-ibm-modules-ops
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.19.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants