fix: change strides parameter to be pointer to const

[PraveshKunwar]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown status: na
• task: lint_package_json status: na
• task: lint_repl_help status: na
• task: lint_javascript_src status: na
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: na
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: na
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: missing_dependencies
• task: lint_c_examples status: na
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: na
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: na
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Resolves #6604

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• Changes parameter (strides) to be declared as pointer to const.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• resolves Fix C lint errors #6604

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
ndarray/base/assert/is-column-major	$\color{green}108/108$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}9/9$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}108/108$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[kgryte]

@PraveshKunwar Would you also mind updating the corresponding header file in the same package to match the updated signature?

[PraveshKunwar]

@kgryte Yep, just fixed it!

[kgryte]

Would you also mind updating the corresponding header file in the same package to match the updated signature?

@PraveshKunwar This still needs to be done. This PR should contain changes to two files: 1) the source file and 2) the associated header file, which can be found in the same package in the include directory.

[PraveshKunwar]

@kgryte ok, I believe everything should be ok now

[kgryte]

LGTM