feat: add JavaScript implementation and clean-up blas/base/dger

[ShabiShett07]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown status: passed
• task: lint_package_json status: passed
• task: lint_repl_help status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: na
• task: lint_c_examples status: missing_dependencies
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Progresses #2039

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• There was a basic structure of /blas/base/dger which needed some update. I have added the Javascript implementation for it and improve the structure too.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• progresses [RFC]: Add BLAS bindings and implementations for linear algebra (tracking issue) #2039

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
blas/base/dger	$\color{green}715/715$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}84/84$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}5/5$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}715/715$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[ShabiShett07]

/stdlib update-copyright-years

[ShabiShett07]

/stdlib merge

[stdlib-bot]

/stdlib merge

@ShabiShett07, the slash command failed to complete. Please check the workflow logs for details.

View workflow run

[ShabiShett07]

@kgryte, I need your review on this, as it is a dependency for LAPACK packages too.

[ShabiShett07]

Also I am not sure about conflicts caused, because I have deleted the C and FORTRAN implementation, as we discussed in one of the office hours.

[kgryte]

You can see the conflicts when you attempt to perform a local merge.

[ShabiShett07]

@kgryte, I have solved the conflicts, ready for review

[kgryte]

This now LGTM. @ShabiShett07 I went ahead and updated the native implementation, as well. So, while Fortran is still not perfect due to dep resolution, everything else seems to work. You should review my work before I merge to make sure I did not make any mistakes.

[ShabiShett07]

@kgryte, made a review and found some small changes which may be helpful

[ShabiShett07]

@kgryte, I have added seperate test cases and I think now it is good to go

[kgryte]

@ShabiShett07 Your changes resulted in an incorrect test description and the tests should have been applied across the other test files. I have now addressed this.

[ShabiShett07]

Sorry for that @kgryte , I was not sure about the test description, so my thought process was, instead of changing all the test files and generate structure error may be get feedback on one. But, finally, the most awaited PR got merged