-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 975
feat: add C implementation for math/base/special/roundsd
#4438
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Coverage Report
The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR. |
|
/stdlib check-files |
|
/stdlib update-copyright-years |
|
/stdlib lint-autofix |
|
I noticed your PR description contains closing keywords ("Resolves", "Closes", or "Fixes") referencing a "Tracking Issue". Why this matters: Required action: Thank you for your contribution to the project! |
math/base/special/roundsdmath/base/special/roundsd
anandkaranubc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @ShabiShett07, thanks for your work on this! I've left a number of comments on the PR. There are quite a few areas that need improvement. When you get a chance, please take a look and let me know if anything is unclear. Happy to help clarify!
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/math/base/special/roundsd/lib/native.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/math/base/special/roundsd/benchmark/c/benchmark.c
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/math/base/special/roundsd/benchmark/c/benchmark.c
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
/stdlib merge |
Co-authored-by: Karan Anand <119553199+anandkaranubc@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Shabareesh Shetty <139731143+ShabiShett07@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shabareesh Shetty <139731143+ShabiShett07@users.noreply.github.com>
kgryte
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other than some minor nitpicks, this is coming along.
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
- task: lint_filenames
status: passed
- task: lint_editorconfig
status: passed
- task: lint_markdown
status: passed
- task: lint_package_json
status: passed
- task: lint_repl_help
status: passed
- task: lint_javascript_src
status: passed
- task: lint_javascript_cli
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_examples
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_tests
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_python
status: na
- task: lint_r
status: na
- task: lint_c_src
status: missing_dependencies
- task: lint_c_examples
status: na
- task: lint_c_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
status: na
- task: lint_shell
status: na
- task: lint_typescript_declarations
status: passed
- task: lint_typescript_tests
status: na
- task: lint_license_headers
status: passed
---
|
@kgryte, thank you for the corrections and I have resolved all the conversations |
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/math/base/special/roundsd/docs/repl.txt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/math/base/special/roundsd/include/stdlib/math/base/special/roundsd.h
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/math/base/special/roundsd/package.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
kgryte
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM after clean-up.
@ShabiShett07 General comment: you'll set yourself up better for long-term success contributing to stdlib if you can pay more attention to detail. In this case, even after updating the descriptions, you ended up diverging from stdlib conventions. When in doubt, study other packages and mimic what you see there. Occasionally, conventions do change, but this is not a frequent occurrence. Currently, a lot of your PRs require a fair amount of clean-up. Would be good to minimize that overhead.
I am really sorry for that, actually didn't give much time to this PR, as I have done this in my initial times, also I think yes, I need to improve a lot in detailing, but thank you for letting me know y mistakes |
Progresses #649 .
Description
This pull request:
Related Issues
-progresses #649
Questions
No.
Other
No.
Checklist
@stdlib-js/reviewers