ci: use clang-format 20 for linting

[sjinks]

This pull request includes a minor update to the lint workflow configuration, specifically updating the version of clang-format used in the CI checks.

• Updated the clang-format-version from 18 to 20 in the .github/workflows/lint.yml workflow to ensure code formatting checks use the latest version.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Upgraded code formatting tool version used in the linting workflow to ensure consistent, up-to-date formatting across the codebase.
  • Improved reliability of automated lint checks without altering workflow behavior or app functionality.
  • No impact on end-user features or performance.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The lint GitHub Actions workflow was updated to use clang-format version 20 instead of 18 in the clang-format-action step across all matrix paths. No other steps or logic were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CI Workflow .github/workflows/lint.yml	Bumped clang-format version from 18 to 20 in clang-format-action; matrix paths unaffected; no other workflow logic changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I twitch my whiskers, formats align,
From 18 to 20—so crisp, so fine.
CI hops smoothly, no steps astray,
Style carrots polished, night to day.
Thump-thump! The code now gleams—
A hare’s neat dream in linting streams. 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title succinctly describes updating the CI lint workflow to use clang-format version 20, directly reflecting the main change in the pull request and following a clear, conventional commit style.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch update-lint-ci

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2af86a and 3cd6f23.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)

• GitHub Check: Run clang-tidy
• GitHub Check: Build and Test
• GitHub Check: Build and Test (ubuntu-24.04)
• GitHub Check: Analyze (c-cpp)
• GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
• GitHub Check: Build and Test (macos-latest)
• GitHub Check: Build and Test (windows-latest)
• GitHub Check: Build and analyze

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)

34-34: Ensure clang-format-version: 20 is supported by jidicula/clang-format-action@v4.15.0.

The action defaults to version 13 and installs the requested version via its check.sh; since apt typically doesn’t ship clang-format 20 yet, requesting “20” will likely fail. Rerun the “Lint C++ code” job on this branch or share a link to the action’s docs/release notes confirming clang-format 20 support.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud