Skip to content

Conversation

@lwsinclair
Copy link

Hi there,

This pull request shares a security update on searchcraft-mcp-server.

We also have an entry for searchcraft-mcp-server in our directory, MseeP.ai, where we provide regular security and trust updates on your app.

We invite you to add our badge for your MCP server to your README to help your users learn from a third party that provides ongoing validation of searchcraft-mcp-server.

You can easily take control over your listing for free: visit it at https://mseep.ai/app/searchcraft-inc-searchcraft-mcp-server.

Yours Sincerely,

Lawrence W. Sinclair
CEO/SkyDeck AI
Founder of MseeP.ai
MCP servers you can trust


MseeP.ai Security Assessment Badge

Here are our latest evaluation results of searchcraft-mcp-server

Security Scan Results

Security Score: 100/100

Risk Level: low

Scan Date: 2025-06-13

Score starts at 100, deducts points for security issues, and adds points for security best practices

This security assessment was conducted by MseeP.ai, an independent security validation service for MCP servers. Visit our website to learn more about our security reviews.

@travis-sc travis-sc self-requested a review June 25, 2025 17:20
Copy link
Contributor

@travis-sc travis-sc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @lwsinclair, looks like an interesting project, thanks for taking the time to include us in your index.
However, the current badge you have is too large for us to use and has cut off text in it. If we were to add a badge, it should follow the size & style conventions of our existing badges. We use shields.io for all our current badges.
It would also need to be positioned with all of our existing badges. Also, if we were going to promote your site by using this badge, it wouldn't hurt to give our repo a star!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants