Skip to content

Conversation

@Saphereye
Copy link

@Saphereye Saphereye commented Nov 29, 2025

Fixes #149448

This PR fixes a potential integer overflow while calculating the children of a node for a BinaryHeap for zero sized types.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 29, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 29, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@quaternic quaternic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left some suggestions rephrasing comments, but with that this is looking good.

If you could then squash the commits, I think it will be ready to go.

View changes since this review

@Saphereye Saphereye force-pushed the binary_heap_integer_overflow branch from 66c47bb to 0edddd2 Compare December 1, 2025 13:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BinaryHeap integer overflow with ZST?

5 participants