Skip to content

Conversation

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member

@Zalathar Zalathar commented Nov 28, 2025

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

nxsaken and others added 14 commits November 19, 2025 13:19
…ser control

All removed suggestions in tests were invalid.
…lize, r=Amanieu

Stabilize `unchecked_neg` and `unchecked_shifts`

Features: `unchecked_neg`, `unchecked_shifts`
Tracking issue: rust-lang#85122

r? `@Amanieu`
…=jieyouxu

rustc_borrowck: Don't suggest changing closure param type not under user control

This changes output of a handful of tests more than the one added in the first commit, but as far as I can tell, all removed suggestions were invalid.

Closes rust-lang#128381 which is **D-invalid-suggestion** with two 👍-votes.
…RalfJung

Use cg_llvm's target_config in miri

Fixes rust-lang#149314

r? `@RalfJung`
…r=Urgau

Run `eval_config_entry` on all branches so we always emit lints

Fixes rust-lang#149090

Ideally I'd have liked to fix this issue using rust-lang#149215, and this is still the long term plan, but this is slightly more annoying to implement than I'd have liked to, and this is also a nice and easy solution to the problem.

r? `@tgross35`
…rd-patterns-liveness, r=Kivooeo

add regression test for guard patterns liveness ICE

closes rust-lang#146445
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rust-analyzer Relevant to the rust-analyzer team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Nov 28, 2025
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member Author

Rollup of everything.

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 28, 2025

📌 Commit 28fae11 has been approved by Zalathar

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 28, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 28, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 28fae11 with merge 88bd39b...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 28, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Zalathar
Pushing 88bd39b to main...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 28, 2025
@bors bors merged commit 88bd39b into rust-lang:main Nov 28, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.93.0 milestone Nov 28, 2025
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#149087 Stabilize unchecked_neg and unchecked_shifts a9b303e9448947b706e851b8cd09d3144d05e2a3 (link)
#149107 rustc_borrowck: Don't suggest changing closure param type n… d4c61285b978ee698c5cf66949daba09aac772a7 (link)
#149323 Use cg_llvm's target_config in miri 11f14863b162ff3191e7162ece02201cbcd0ca80 (link)
#149380 Run eval_config_entry on all branches so we always emit l… c1f765072754479e85a8974f7a66cceec127138d (link)
#149394 add regression test for guard patterns liveness ICE fa949bdfc43f93a4d64c41f3c4c3bdb9c809645d (link)

previous master: 10776a4071

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 10776a4 (parent) -> 88bd39b (this PR)

Test differences

Show 4018 test diffs

Stage 1

  • [ui] tests/ui/borrowck/option-inspect-mutation.rs: [missing] -> pass (J1)
  • [ui] tests/ui/check-cfg/cfg-select.rs: [missing] -> pass (J1)
  • [ui] tests/ui/pattern/rfc-3637-guard-patterns/liveness-ice-issue-146445.rs: [missing] -> pass (J1)

Stage 2

  • [ui] tests/ui/borrowck/option-inspect-mutation.rs: [missing] -> pass (J0)
  • [ui] tests/ui/check-cfg/cfg-select.rs: [missing] -> pass (J0)
  • [ui] tests/ui/pattern/rfc-3637-guard-patterns/liveness-ice-issue-146445.rs: [missing] -> pass (J0)

Additionally, 4012 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Job group index

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 88bd39beb342e2ae7ded1eb7d58697416686d679 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. dist-aarch64-apple: 7710.8s -> 5953.0s (-22.8%)
  2. x86_64-gnu-gcc: 3852.0s -> 3038.8s (-21.1%)
  3. dist-x86_64-apple: 7231.3s -> 6037.7s (-16.5%)
  4. pr-check-1: 1932.1s -> 1644.1s (-14.9%)
  5. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20: 2816.7s -> 2435.8s (-13.5%)
  6. dist-aarch64-llvm-mingw: 5865.7s -> 5167.0s (-11.9%)
  7. aarch64-apple: 8835.0s -> 7870.4s (-10.9%)
  8. pr-check-2: 2621.8s -> 2338.0s (-10.8%)
  9. i686-gnu-1: 8291.5s -> 7396.0s (-10.8%)
  10. armhf-gnu: 5479.1s -> 4887.3s (-10.8%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (88bd39b): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 1

Cycles

Results (primary -2.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.9% [-3.3%, -2.6%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.9% [-3.3%, -2.6%] 2

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 471.457s -> 472.29s (0.18%)
Artifact size: 386.89 MiB -> 386.94 MiB (0.01%)

@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the rollup-wke6axp branch November 28, 2025 10:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rust-analyzer Relevant to the rust-analyzer team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants