Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics #145881

fmease · 2025-08-26T12:45:23Z

Follow-up to #145747.

Presently, it's unclear to me if it's possible to migrate all variants to dyn lint diagnostics without regressing performance because for some early lints decorate_builtin_lint performs a bit more work (past PR #124417 has shown that eagerly decorating early lints is incredibly heavy and we had to revert back to lazily decorating in #125410). Let's see how this fares once I tackle the more 'risky' variants.

cc @joshtriplett (you can immediately unsubscribe again, I just want to prevent duplicate efforts).

joshtriplett · 2025-08-30T00:51:30Z

Seems worth a try.

You might consider finishing the set you currently have and doing a perf run.

joshtriplett · 2025-08-30T00:53:50Z

@fmease Regarding the potential performance issues, reading the previous PRs I don't think this is likely to hit the same issues. It could potentially regress for other reasons, but this change won't make the decorating any less lazy.

fmease · 2025-09-02T18:54:50Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[WIP] Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics

fmease · 2025-09-02T19:03:17Z

@bors try cancel

rust-bors · 2025-09-02T19:03:20Z

Try build cancelled. Cancelled workflows:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/17413158733

fmease · 2025-09-02T19:10:25Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[WIP] Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics

rust-bors · 2025-09-02T21:27:36Z

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 9d79411 (9d794119e470cc679493ce04193550fe54c76727, parent: a2c8b0b92c14b02f0b3f96a0d5296f1090dc286b)

rust-timer · 2025-09-03T00:07:12Z

Finished benchmarking commit (9d79411): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.2%, -0.1%]	14
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.7%, -0.1%]	18
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.2%, -0.1%]	14

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.3%, secondary -0.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.3%	[1.3%, 1.3%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.7%	[1.2%, 2.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.0%	[-2.1%, -2.0%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.3%	[1.3%, 1.3%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary 2.2%, secondary 3.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.6%	[3.6%, 3.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	2

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 465.026s -> 464.899s (-0.03%)
Artifact size: 388.33 MiB -> 388.40 MiB (0.02%)

joshtriplett · 2025-09-14T05:45:46Z

@fmease This is looking great. It seems worth merging the ones you have so far, to avoid the PR developing conflicts. r=me as soon as it passes CI and you're ready to merge it.

Dropped in favor a hard error in RUST-127907.

fmease · 2025-09-14T10:39:29Z

@bors r=joshtriplett

bors · 2025-09-14T10:39:31Z

📌 Commit ec7ad59 has been approved by joshtriplett

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors · 2025-09-14T10:40:42Z

⌛ Testing commit ec7ad59 with merge 52618eb...

bors · 2025-09-14T13:52:25Z

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: joshtriplett
Pushing 52618eb to master...

github-actions · 2025-09-14T13:55:17Z

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing ddaf123 (parent) -> 52618eb (this PR)

Test differences

Show 902 test diffs

Stage 0

errors::autodiff::verify_builtin_macros_autodiff_mode_activity_29: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::metavar_exprs::verify_expand_mve_unrecognized_expr_42: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_ast_passes_abi_x86_interrupt_69: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_ast_passes_fieldless_union_46: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_ast_passes_missing_unsafe_on_extern_lint_45: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_ast_passes_negative_bound_not_supported_56: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_ast_passes_precise_capturing_duplicated_62: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_alloc_error_must_be_fn_13: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_alloc_must_statics_29: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_asm_no_matched_argument_name_75: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_asm_pure_no_output_64: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_asm_unsupported_option_73: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_assert_missing_comma_16: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_bench_sig_23: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_cfg_accessible_has_args_15: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_cfg_accessible_unspecified_path_17: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_concat_bytes_bad_repeat_43: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_concat_bytestr_18: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_derive_path_args_list_46: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_env_not_defined_52: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_export_macro_rules_25: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_format_no_arg_named_62: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_format_positional_after_named_56: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_format_unused_arg_63: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_source_uitls_expected_item_86: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_tests_not_support_40: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_expand_glob_delegation_outside_impls_35: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_expand_invalid_cfg_no_predicate_13: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_expand_invalid_cfg_no_predicate_17: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_expand_invalid_cfg_predicate_literal_15: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_expand_invalid_fragment_specifier_32: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_expand_meta_var_dif_seq_matchers_4: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_expand_proc_macro_derive_tokens_24: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_arguments_macro_use_not_allowed_40: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_attributes_starting_with_rustc_are_reserved_51: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_cannot_be_reexported_private_30: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_cannot_use_through_an_import_54: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_imported_crate_23: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_is_private_49: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_macro_expanded_macro_exports_accessed_by_absolute_paths_24: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_name_reserved_in_attribute_namespace_53: pass -> [missing] (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_proc_macro_derive_resolution_fallback_23: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_static_lifetime_is_reserved_49: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_tool_only_accepts_identifiers_58: [missing] -> pass (J1)
errors::verify_resolve_unused_label_63: [missing] -> pass (J1)
lints::verify_lint_associated_const_elided_lifetime_121: [missing] -> pass (J1)
lints::verify_lint_duplicate_macro_attribute_118: pass -> [missing] (J1)
lints::verify_lint_macro_rule_never_used_113: pass -> [missing] (J1)
lints::verify_lint_metavariable_still_repeating_120: pass -> [missing] (J1)
lints::verify_lint_out_of_scope_macro_calls_123: [missing] -> pass (J1)
lints::verify_lint_proc_macro_derive_resolution_fallback_126: pass -> [missing] (J1)
lints::verify_lint_unused_label_110: pass -> [missing] (J1)
lints::verify_lint_unused_macro_definition_112: pass -> [missing] (J1)

Stage 1

errors::autodiff::verify_builtin_macros_autodiff_number_activities_28: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::metavar_exprs::verify_expand_mve_missing_paren_36: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_ast_passes_const_and_c_variadic_51: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_ast_passes_extern_without_abi_sugg_63: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_ast_passes_negative_bound_not_supported_56: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_ast_passes_precise_capturing_duplicated_62: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_ast_passes_where_clause_after_type_alias_46: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_alloc_must_statics_24: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_alloc_must_statics_29: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_asm_mayunwind_71: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_asm_opt_already_provided_72: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_asm_unsupported_clobber_abi_74: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_bench_sig_23: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_cfg_select_no_matches_90: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_concat_bytes_bad_repeat_43: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_concat_bytestr_23: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_derive_macro_call_53: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_expected_comma_in_list_77: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_expected_other_89: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_format_unused_arg_58: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_requires_cfg_pattern_6: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_source_uitls_expected_item_81: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_test_bad_fn_65: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_test_case_non_item_59: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_test_runner_nargs_76: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_tests_not_support_45: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_builtin_macros_trace_macros_22: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_expand_collapse_debuginfo_illegal_10: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_expand_crate_name_in_cfg_attr_31: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_expand_incomplete_parse_22: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_expand_module_circular_20: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_expand_recursion_limit_reached_10: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_expand_remove_expr_not_supported_15: [missing] -> pass (J0)
errors::verify_expand_remove_node_not_supported_19: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_expand_wrong_fragment_kind_16: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_resolve_anonymous_lifetime_non_gat_report_error_44: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_resolve_lending_iterator_report_error_43: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_resolve_name_reserved_in_attribute_namespace_53: pass -> [missing] (J0)
errors::verify_resolve_unnamed_crate_root_import_43: [missing] -> pass (J0)
lints::verify_lint_ambiguous_glob_reexport_141: pass -> [missing] (J0)
lints::verify_lint_avoid_att_syntax_115: pass -> [missing] (J0)
lints::verify_lint_ill_formed_attribute_input_125: pass -> [missing] (J0)
lints::verify_lint_macro_rule_never_used_113: pass -> [missing] (J0)
lints::verify_lint_named_argument_used_positionally_116: [missing] -> pass (J0)
lints::verify_lint_private_extern_crate_reexport_107: [missing] -> pass (J0)
lints::verify_lint_reserved_multihash_126: [missing] -> pass (J0)
lints::verify_lint_unused_doc_comment_128: pass -> [missing] (J0)

(and 790 additional test diffs)

Additionally, 12 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Job group index

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 52618eb338609df44978b0ca4451ab7941fd1c7a --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

dist-aarch64-apple: 5989.9s -> 6900.7s (15.2%)
dist-x86_64-windows-gnullvm: 4664.6s -> 5285.5s (13.3%)
x86_64-gnu-llvm-19: 2726.1s -> 2396.9s (-12.1%)
x86_64-gnu-tools: 3735.5s -> 3299.0s (-11.7%)
dist-apple-various: 3748.7s -> 4144.4s (10.6%)
aarch64-gnu: 6839.9s -> 6177.1s (-9.7%)
x86_64-msvc-2: 7451.5s -> 6761.2s (-9.3%)
armhf-gnu: 4769.3s -> 5186.0s (8.7%)
dist-ohos-x86_64: 4290.0s -> 4661.6s (8.7%)
dist-powerpc-linux: 4973.2s -> 5401.0s (8.6%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

rust-timer · 2025-09-14T15:54:43Z

Finished benchmarking commit (52618eb): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.2%	[0.2%, 0.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.9%, secondary 0.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.9%	[-0.9%, -0.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.2%	[-1.2%, -1.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.9%	[-0.9%, -0.9%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary -2.3%, secondary -4.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.3%	[-2.3%, -2.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.0%	[-4.0%, -4.0%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.3%	[-2.3%, -2.3%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 473.077s -> 474.182s (0.23%)
Artifact size: 390.10 MiB -> 390.15 MiB (0.01%)

…elmann Move even more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics Follow-up to #145881 and #145747. I originally wanted to migrate most if not the entire rest of the early buffered lints. However, when trying to migrate the buffered lints used by check-cfg I encountered a roadblock. Namely, it depends on `TyCtxt` (well, `Option<TyCtxt>`) which makes it quite hard to migrate (see also #147634 (comment), #147634 (comment) & #149215). So for now, I won't migrate it (maybe #149215 will find a solution), nor will I migrate the rest since it's quite tedious to migrate these. I'll leave them for future me.

rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 26, 2025

fmease added the rla-silenced Silences rust-log-analyzer postings to the PR it's added on. label Aug 26, 2025

fmease force-pushed the mv-var-to-dyn-buf-lints branch 3 times, most recently from e37e022 to 37c36c5 Compare August 27, 2025 14:31

fmease force-pushed the mv-var-to-dyn-buf-lints branch from 37c36c5 to 5cecd4a Compare September 2, 2025 18:54

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025

Auto merge of #145881 - fmease:mv-var-to-dyn-buf-lints, r=<try>

1db413a

[WIP] Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 2, 2025

fmease force-pushed the mv-var-to-dyn-buf-lints branch from 5cecd4a to 6358700 Compare September 2, 2025 19:10

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025

Auto merge of #145881 - fmease:mv-var-to-dyn-buf-lints, r=<try>

9d79411

[WIP] Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 3, 2025

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

fmease force-pushed the mv-var-to-dyn-buf-lints branch 2 times, most recently from 30e999b to 7d9c1e2 Compare September 14, 2025 04:23

fmease force-pushed the mv-var-to-dyn-buf-lints branch from 7d9c1e2 to 5e2defc Compare September 14, 2025 09:50

fmease added the rla-silenced Silences rust-log-analyzer postings to the PR it's added on. label Sep 14, 2025

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 14, 2025

fmease added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 14, 2025

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

fmease added 5 commits September 14, 2025 12:38

Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics (1/N)

2e81673

Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics (2/N)

31c0d96

Remove a dead early lint

379b181

Dropped in favor a hard error in RUST-127907.

Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics (3/N)

27a180a

Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics (4/N)

ec7ad59

fmease force-pushed the mv-var-to-dyn-buf-lints branch from 5e2defc to ec7ad59 Compare September 14, 2025 10:38

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 14, 2025

fmease removed the rla-silenced Silences rust-log-analyzer postings to the PR it's added on. label Sep 14, 2025

bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 14, 2025

bors merged commit 52618eb into rust-lang:master Sep 14, 2025
11 checks passed

rustbot added this to the 1.92.0 milestone Sep 14, 2025

This was referenced Sep 14, 2025

fresh binding should shadow the def in expand #143141

Open

Externally implementable items #146348

Open

fmease deleted the mv-var-to-dyn-buf-lints branch September 14, 2025 16:59

fmease mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2025

Move even more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics #147634

Merged

Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics #145881

Move more early buffered lints to dyn lint diagnostics #145881

Uh oh!

Conversation

fmease commented Aug 26, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

joshtriplett commented Aug 30, 2025

Uh oh!

joshtriplett commented Aug 30, 2025

Uh oh!

fmease commented Sep 2, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

fmease commented Sep 2, 2025

Uh oh!

rust-bors bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Uh oh!

fmease commented Sep 2, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented Sep 3, 2025

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as resolved.

joshtriplett commented Sep 14, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as resolved.

This comment was marked as resolved.

fmease commented Sep 14, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 14, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 14, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 14, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Sep 14, 2025

Test differences

Stage 0

Stage 1

Job duration changes

Uh oh!

rust-timer commented Sep 14, 2025

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

fmease commented Aug 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading