-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.1k
Move placeholder error handling to before region inference #142623
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
amandasystems
wants to merge
17
commits into
rust-lang:main
Choose a base branch
from
amandasystems:early-placeholder-errors
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
93fc946
Move handling of placeholder errors to before region inference
amandasystems 00a5015
Revise the tests for `coroutine/auto-trait-regions`
amandasystems 93cddc9
Avoid adding edges to static where we already flag other errors
amandasystems 8f9c89c
Only flag the error for placeholder-existential failures if there is
amandasystems c90b964
Clarify when and why we can skip adding the : 'static constraints
amandasystems 5ebced9
Be more restrictive of when we add placeholder-existential errors
amandasystems fe03861
Remove precise placeholder tracking from region inference
amandasystems 6db3b33
More explicit version of placeholder constraint handling
amandasystems 7e758c4
Simplify the placeholder error reporting, add skipping logic
amandasystems be81d10
Simplify error handling & placeholder reachability
amandasystems 42bac69
Simplify some of the error handling for placeholder errors
amandasystems e8c7834
Switch SCC annotations to a update style; it's more ergonomic
amandasystems 0115818
Some more code cleanup
amandasystems 38e472e
Remove option use according to review comments
amandasystems 656caf6
One of the duplicate errors will not be flagged here
amandasystems 07c353b
Report fewer duplicate errors in tests
amandasystems fbe2418
Only annotate region graph SCCs with their representative for functio…
amandasystems File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the "checked sub" part is what really broke me here. Why are universes being adjusted? What's a base universe? And why can the subtraction sometimes overflow?!?!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See also
bound_region_errors, line 502There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the record, these are the only reads of
base_universeonCanonicalTypeOpDeeplyNormalizeGoal,CanonicalTypeOpAscribeUserTypeGoalandInstantiateOpaqueType.