Skip to content

Conversation

@afc163
Copy link
Member

@afc163 afc163 commented Nov 25, 2025

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@afc163 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f69c059 and 1537e38.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/MotionThumb.tsx (1 hunks)
  • tests/index.test.tsx (1 hunks)

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch afc163-patch-1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @afc163, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a refactoring effort to standardize the package naming convention by transitioning from rc-segmented to @rc-component/segmented. This change primarily impacts how the package is identified and integrated, ensuring consistency with broader project guidelines.

Highlights

  • Package Renaming: The package name has been updated from rc-segmented to the new scoped package name @rc-component/segmented across the entire README.md file.
  • Documentation Update: All references, including NPM badges, installation instructions, usage examples, and the default prefixCls value, have been adjusted to reflect the new package name.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 25, 2025

😭 Deploy PR Preview 1537e38 failed. Build logs

🤖 By surge-preview

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.39%. Comparing base (f69c059) to head (1537e38).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #306   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.39%   99.39%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         164      164           
  Branches       40       39    -1     
=======================================
  Hits          163      163           
  Misses          1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the README.md file to reflect the new package name @rc-component/segmented. While the updates to links and import paths are correct, the refactoring appears incomplete and introduces a significant inconsistency. The default value for prefixCls has been changed in the documentation but not in the component's source code, which will likely cause confusion for developers. I've also noted a minor typo in a code example within the README. Please see my detailed comments.

README.md Outdated
| Property | Type | Default | Description |
| --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- |
| prefixCls | string | rc-segmented | prefixCls of this component |
| prefixCls | string | @rc-component/segmented | prefixCls of this component |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The documentation for the default value of prefixCls is updated to @rc-component/segmented, but the actual default value in the source code (src/index.tsx) remains 'rc-segmented'. This discrepancy between the documentation and the implementation can be misleading for users of the library. To ensure consistency, the default value in the source code should be updated to match this documentation. Given the package rename, this seems like the correct path forward.

afc163 and others added 2 commits November 25, 2025 11:38
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@afc163 afc163 changed the title refactor: remove rc-* from deps refactor: update rc-motion to @rc-component/motion Nov 25, 2025
@socket-security
Copy link

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Added@​rc-component/​motion@​1.1.4941009987100

View full report

@afc163 afc163 merged commit f0c237e into master Nov 25, 2025
12 checks passed
@afc163 afc163 deleted the afc163-patch-1 branch November 25, 2025 04:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants