Skip to content

Conversation

@ZeroIntensity
Copy link
Member

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity commented Nov 6, 2025

Comment on lines 461 to 462
Return true if *od* is a dict object, but not an instance of a subtype of
the :class:`~collections.OrderedDict` type. This function always succeeds.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Return true if *od* is a dict object, but not an instance of a subtype of
the :class:`~collections.OrderedDict` type. This function always succeeds.
Return true if *od* is an ordered dictionary object, but not
an instance of a subtype of the :class:`~collections.OrderedDict` type.
This function always succeeds.
- a dict object
+ an ordered dictionary object

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Applied this one locally because I didn't want to deal with conflicts.

Comment on lines 448 to 449
Since Python 3.7, dictionaries are ordered by default, so there is usually
little need for this object.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest moving this to the introductory paragraph.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@ZeroIntensity
Copy link
Member Author

I'd like to finish #141009 before doing this one.

Copy link
Member

@StanFromIreland StanFromIreland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity added needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes needs backport to 3.14 bugs and security fixes labels Nov 17, 2025
@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity merged commit b362632 into python:main Nov 17, 2025
30 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in Docs PRs Nov 17, 2025
@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity deleted the document-pyodict branch November 17, 2025 19:40
@miss-islington-app
Copy link

Thanks @ZeroIntensity for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13, 3.14.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
(cherry picked from commit b362632)

Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <zintensitydev@gmail.com>
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented Nov 17, 2025

GH-141677 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.14 bugs and security fixes label Nov 17, 2025
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
(cherry picked from commit b362632)

Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <zintensitydev@gmail.com>
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented Nov 17, 2025

GH-141678 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes label Nov 17, 2025
ZeroIntensity added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
gh-141004: Document `PyODict*` APIs (GH-141136)
(cherry picked from commit b362632)

Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <zintensitydev@gmail.com>
ZeroIntensity added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
gh-141004: Document `PyODict*` APIs (GH-141136)
(cherry picked from commit b362632)

Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <zintensitydev@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants