Feat: Content Filtering Exception Handling

[AlanPonnachan]

Unified Content Filtering Exception Handling

This PR closes #1035

Standardizing how content filtering events are handled across different model providers.

Previously, triggering a content filter resulted in inconsistent behaviors: generic ModelHTTPError (Azure), UnexpectedModelBehavior (Google), or silent failures depending on the provider. This PR introduces a dedicated exception hierarchy to allow users to catch and handle prompt refusals and response interruptions programmatically and consistently.

Key Changes:

• New Exceptions: Added ContentFilterError (base), PromptContentFilterError (for input rejections, e.g., Azure 400), and ResponseContentFilterError (for output refusals).
• OpenAI & Azure: Updated logic to raise PromptContentFilterError for Azure's specific 400 error body and ResponseContentFilterError when finish_reason='content_filter'.
• Google Gemini: Updated _process_response to raise ResponseContentFilterError instead of UnexpectedModelBehavior when safety thresholds are triggered.
• Anthropic: Added mapping for refusal stop reasons to raise ResponseContentFilterError.
• Tests: Added comprehensive tests covering synchronous and streaming scenarios for OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic in tests/models/.

Example Usage:

from pydantic_ai import Agent
from pydantic_ai.exceptions import ContentFilterError

agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')

try:
    # If the prompt or generation triggers a safety filter
    await agent.run("Generate unsafe content...")
except ContentFilterError as e:
    # Catches both PromptContentFilterError and ResponseContentFilterError
    print(f"Request halted by safety filter: {e}")

[rahim-figs]

Is it possible to handle AWS Bedrock as well? Thanks.

[dsfaccini]

Hey @AlanPonnachan thank you for the PR! I've requested a couple small changes, let me know if you have any questions

[dsfaccini]

one more thing I missed, please include the name of the new exception in the fallback model docs

ModelAPIError, which includes ModelHTTPError and ...

[AlanPonnachan]

@dsfaccini Thank you for the review. I’ve made the requested changes.

[dsfaccini]

hey @AlanPonnachan thanks a lot for your work! It looks very good now, I requested a couple more changes but once that's done and coverage passes I think the PR will be ready for merge.

[AlanPonnachan]

@dsfaccini Thanks again for the review! I’ve applied the requested changes. Test coverage is now at 100%.