Better LaTeX-Code, trees now look better #6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Owner
|
Thanks for this, makes a lot of sense. It would be great if you could also make the changes to the solutions, so that this is all contained in one PR :) |
Author
|
Yes, I think I will do this after my exams :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I defined the empty tree as a new command (in order to get rid of some redundant LaTeX code).
Only the "Exercises" PDF is changed, but similar ideas can be applied to other files.
Maybe the new commands are better defined in the main TeX template files, in order to avoid errors caused by new commands in different exercises having the same name (and before \begin{document} for better code style).