Skip to content

Conversation

@jhadvig
Copy link
Member

@jhadvig jhadvig commented Dec 3, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/severity-low Referenced Jira bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jhadvig: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65469, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

/assign @TheRealJon @Leo6Leo

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 3, 2025
Copy link
Member

@TheRealJon TheRealJon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, TheRealJon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

@jhadvig: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Dec 4, 2025

/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. label Dec 4, 2025
@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Dec 9, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jhadvig: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65469, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jhadvig jhadvig changed the title OCPBUGS-65469: Add missing relatedObjects + small refactoring OCPBUGS-65496: Add missing relatedObjects + small refactoring Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jhadvig: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65496, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

/assign @TheRealJon @Leo6Leo

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@yanpzhan
Copy link

Checked on cluster launched against the pr, now there are 5 new clusterroles shown up:

$ oc adm inspect clusteroperator console --kubeconfig 1075.kubeconfig 
Gathering data for ns/openshift-network-console...
Warning: apps.openshift.io/v1 DeploymentConfig is deprecated in v4.14+, unavailable in v4.10000+
Warning: v1 Endpoints is deprecated in v1.33+; use discovery.k8s.io/v1 EndpointSlice
Gathering data for ns/openshift-console-operator...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-console...
Wrote inspect data to inspect.local.3025383797214543134.
$ ls inspect.local.3025383797214543134/cluster-scoped-resources/rbac.authorization.k8s.io/clusterroles/
console-extensions-reader.yaml  console-operator.yaml  console.yaml  helm-chartrepos-viewer.yaml  project-helm-chartrepository-editor.yaml

Screenshot from 2025-12-10 13-20-42 @jhadvig clusterroles have been added in relatedObjects, if there are any clusterrolebindings need to to added too?

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65496, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.22." or "openshift-4.22.", but it targets "4.21.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@yanpzhan
Copy link

@jhadvig If there is not clusterrolebinding to be added in related objects, I'd like to add verified label to the pr.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-low Referenced Jira bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants