Skip to content

Conversation

@jyma22
Copy link
Contributor

@jyma22 jyma22 commented Sep 25, 2025

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit d4d1fbc2 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Thomas Schatzl on Mar 3, 2022 and was reviewed by Albert Mingkun Yang and Ivan Walulya.

This PR depends on pr/3992, so the target would be changed from pr/3992 to master once pr/3992 is approved and merged.

Testing: jtreg 1-3 gha

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • JDK-8282484 needs maintainer approval
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8282484: G1: Predicted old time in log always zero (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3993/head:pull/3993
$ git checkout pull/3993

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3993
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3993/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3993

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3993

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3993.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Sep 25, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Hi @jyma22, welcome to this OpenJDK project and thanks for contributing!

We do not recognize you as Contributor and need to ensure you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA). If you have not signed the OCA, please follow the instructions. Please fill in your GitHub username in the "Username" field of the application. Once you have signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /signed in a comment in this pull request.

If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user jyma22" as summary for the issue.

If you are contributing this work on behalf of your employer and your employer has signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /covered in a comment in this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 25, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@jyma22
Copy link
Contributor Author

jyma22 commented Sep 25, 2025

/signed

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Sep 25, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Thank you! Please allow for up to two weeks to process your OCA, although it is usually done within one to two business days. Also, please note that pull requests that are pending an OCA check will not usually be evaluated, so your patience is appreciated!

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot removed oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status labels Oct 29, 2025
@jyma22 jyma22 changed the title Backport <d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404> 8282484: G1: Predicted old time in log always zero Nov 17, 2025
@jyma22
Copy link
Contributor Author

jyma22 commented Nov 17, 2025

/approval request fixes log output for the amount of expected time the initial set of old gen regions is going to take

@jyma22 jyma22 marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2025 22:18
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 17, 2025

@jyma22
8282484: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 17, 2025
@jyma22 jyma22 changed the title 8282484: G1: Predicted old time in log always zero Backport d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404 Nov 17, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport d4d1fbc27a2382d8d9545b7bf672cdcc81654404 8282484: G1: Predicted old time in log always zero Nov 17, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 17, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base label Nov 17, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Webrevs

@jyma22 jyma22 marked this pull request as draft November 17, 2025 22:46
@jyma22 jyma22 changed the base branch from master to pr/3992 November 17, 2025 22:47
@openjdk openjdk bot added clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required and removed rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 17, 2025
@jyma22
Copy link
Contributor Author

jyma22 commented Nov 17, 2025

This backport itself was clean, but it was built on unapproved changes on PR #3992.

@jyma22 jyma22 marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2025 22:55
@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Nov 17, 2025
@jyma22
Copy link
Contributor Author

jyma22 commented Nov 20, 2025

Fix Request 17u

Backporting this patch fixes the log output to accurately report the expected time required to process the initial set of old gen regions.
Path applies cleanly to 17u, but requires JDK-8306444 to be applied first through pr/3992.
Included test passes. Ran tier1-3.

@jyma22
Copy link
Contributor Author

jyma22 commented Nov 26, 2025

/approval request Backporting this patch fixes the log output to accurately report the expected time required to process the initial set of old gen regions.
Path applies cleanly to 17u, but requires JDK-8306444 to be applied first through pr/3992.
Included test passes. Ran tier1-3.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 26, 2025

@jyma22
8282484: Approval has already been requested and approved.

@jyma22 jyma22 changed the base branch from pr/3992 to master December 5, 2025 18:38
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required label Dec 5, 2025
@jyma22 jyma22 force-pushed the JDK-8282484-ctw-gc-improv branch from ccb7e45 to 6fbbf23 Compare December 5, 2025 19:17
@jyma22 jyma22 closed this Dec 5, 2025
@jyma22 jyma22 deleted the JDK-8282484-ctw-gc-improv branch December 5, 2025 19:19
@jyma22 jyma22 restored the JDK-8282484-ctw-gc-improv branch December 5, 2025 19:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant