Skip to content

Conversation

@LlamaLad7
Copy link
Contributor

They in fact are allowed.

@Earthcomputer
Copy link
Member

@LlamaLad7 this code was added to address #2369, has the situation changed since?

@LlamaLad7
Copy link
Contributor Author

LlamaLad7 commented Dec 23, 2025

I don't think it was ever the case. Mixin does not attempt to make any distinction between anonymous and named inner classes, they're handled identically.

There is a bug where Mixin will not remap field accesses to inner classes (which will soon be fixed in FabricMixin) but that affects anonymous classes just the same.

@Earthcomputer Earthcomputer merged commit 3f627fa into minecraft-dev:dev Dec 23, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants