ci: load the configuration for auto-request-review workflow from a custom location

[martin-georgiev]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chore
  • Enhanced the automated review process by introducing streamlined reviewer assignments that designate a default reviewer, enforce a single-reviewer limit, and ignore draft submissions.
  • Enabled local configuration support to prevent authors from reviewing their own changes, ensuring a smoother and more efficient review cycle.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new configuration file for the GitHub Actions auto-request review feature and updates the associated workflow. The new file defines a default reviewer, review process options, and additional parameters. The workflow is modified to reference this local configuration file and enable its usage by setting the appropriate parameters.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.github/.../config.yml	New configuration file added for auto-request review. It defines a default reviewer ("martin-georgiev"), sets the number of reviewers to 1, ignores draft PRs, and restricts the PR author from being a reviewer.
.github/.../auto-request-review.yml	Workflow updated to include two new parameters: one specifying the path to the new configuration file and another (use_local: true) to enable the utilization of the local configuration in the review process.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant PR as Pull Request
    participant Action as Auto-Review Action
    participant Config as Local Config File
    participant Reviewer as Reviewer ("martin-georgiev")

    PR->>Action: PR created (non-draft)
    Action->>Config: Load configuration settings
    Config-->>Action: Return reviewer settings, review count, etc.
    Action->>Reviewer: Request review

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• ci: finetune when specific workflow steps shall run #321: Modifies execution conditions of the auto-request-review job, directly connecting through adjustments in the workflow file.

Poem

Hey there, I'm a bunny, hopping with glee,
A new config file brings magic you see!
Reviewers and settings in a neat little row,
Carrots of code, making our workflow glow.
With each hop and each change in view,
I celebrate this update—wishing joy to you!
🐰🌟

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/actions/auto-request-review/config.yml (1)

5-8: Set Review Process Options
The inclusion of options such as number_of_reviewers: 1, ignore_draft: true, and allow_author: false provides explicit control over the review process, ensuring that draft PRs are ignored and authors are not self-assigned as reviewers. The configuration is clear and easy to extend if needed in the future.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 90c0a60 and 56aa32d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/actions/auto-request-review/config.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/auto-request-review.yml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (19)

• GitHub Check: PHP 8.4 + Doctrine ORM 2.18 + Doctrine Lexer 2.1
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.4 + Doctrine ORM 3.0 + Doctrine Lexer latest
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.4 + Doctrine ORM 3.0 + Doctrine Lexer 3.0
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.3 + Doctrine ORM latest + Doctrine Lexer 3.0
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.3 + Doctrine ORM 2.14 + Doctrine Lexer 2.1
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.4 + Doctrine ORM latest + Doctrine Lexer 3.0
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.3 + Doctrine ORM latest + Doctrine Lexer latest
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.2 + Doctrine ORM latest + Doctrine Lexer 3.0
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.4 + Doctrine ORM 2.18 + Doctrine Lexer latest
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.3 + Doctrine ORM 3.0 + Doctrine Lexer latest
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.2 + Doctrine ORM latest + Doctrine Lexer 2.1
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.2 + Doctrine ORM 2.14 + Doctrine Lexer latest
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.2 + Doctrine ORM latest + Doctrine Lexer latest
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.2 + Doctrine ORM 2.18 + Doctrine Lexer latest
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.3 + Doctrine ORM latest + Doctrine Lexer 2.1
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.3 + Doctrine ORM 2.18 + Doctrine Lexer 2.1
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.3 + Doctrine ORM 2.18 + Doctrine Lexer latest
• GitHub Check: PHP 8.1 + Doctrine ORM 2.14 + Doctrine Lexer latest
• GitHub Check: sloth

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.github/workflows/auto-request-review.yml (1)

37-38: Explicitly Load Local Configuration
The addition of the config: .github/actions/auto-request-review/config.yml and use_local: true parameters clearly indicates that the workflow should load the custom configuration file. This change meets the PR objective and improves flexibility. Ensure that the file path is correct and that the referenced configuration file exists in the expected location.

.github/actions/auto-request-review/config.yml (1)

1-4: Define Default Reviewer in Configuration
The configuration correctly sets the default reviewer to "martin-georgiev" under the reviewers.defaults list. This aligns with the intended changes and clarifies which reviewer should be automatically assigned.