-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 369
Organize workflow #185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Organize workflow #185
Conversation
Deduplicate and summarize workflow file.
|
@Meltie2013 Does this look ok to you ? |
|
@billy1arm Once I see an updated workflow with the changes in play, will make the call. |
Said up-to-date, not on a branch, had to `git pull origin master`.
billy1arm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Pysis868 can you revise this to the latest revision for the submodules ?
- dep - Eluna - realmd - Extractor_projects Strange each was in a detached HEAD state with a lot of changes / absent items. Cleaned those / discarded all changes, then pulled for each directly because of that problem not allowing easy looping from git. Already current: - SD3 - win
|
As of a270f22, and an extra |
For Eluna since it caused a `Hook.h` error.
to be consistent with master branch.
|
Master was not using latest. |
Does added the |
Meltie2013
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Pysis868 Please check comment for details.
Add `source` to package script invocation. Bring back commands for Windows build without script execution capability.
Pysis868
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 2 of 4 files at r1, 1 of 6 files at r2, 1 of 1 files at r3, 3 of 4 files at r5, 2 of 2 files at r6, 2 of 2 files at r7, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 8 unresolved discussions (waiting on @billy1arm and @Meltie2013)
.github/workflows/core_build.yml line 21 at r6 (raw file):
Previously, Meltie2013 wrote…
This should be:
run: source ./apps/ci/ci-packages.sh
Done.
Pysis868
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 8 unresolved discussions (waiting on @billy1arm and @Meltie2013)
apps/ci/ci-compile.sh line 0 at r2 (raw file):
Previously, Meltie2013 wrote…
(Reviewable was unable to map this GitHub inline comment thread to the right spot — sorry!)
This should remain to see if the directory exists already or not.
Done.
src/realmd line 0 at r4 (raw file):
Previously, billy1arm (Antz) wrote…
@Pysis868 can you revise this to the latest revision
Done.
Previously, billy1arm (Antz) wrote…
@Pysis868 can you revise this to the latest revision
Done.
.github/workflows/core_windows_build.yml line 29 at r6 (raw file):
Previously, Meltie2013 wrote…
This line should be reverted back to how it was, since Shell files can not run in Windows directly.
Done.
src/modules/Eluna line 0 at r4 (raw file):
Previously, billy1arm (Antz) wrote…
@Pysis868 can you revise this to the latest revision
Done.
src/tools/Extractor_projects line 0 at r4 (raw file):
Previously, billy1arm (Antz) wrote…
@Pysis868 can you revise this to the latest revision
Done.
Pysis868
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 8 unresolved discussions (waiting on @billy1arm and @Meltie2013)
Pysis868
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 8 unresolved discussions (waiting on @billy1arm and @Meltie2013)
billy1arm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 4 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r3, 3 of 4 files at r5, 2 of 2 files at r6, 2 of 2 files at r7, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 8 unresolved discussions (waiting on @Meltie2013)
How palatable are these changes, if even relevant now?
This change is