Skip to content

Conversation

@vinnyperella
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@vinnyperella
Copy link
Contributor Author

Quick question, should I be incrementing the version number (maybe like 2.3.11)? The Arch repos have the build from March 28th.

@m13253
Copy link
Owner

m13253 commented Nov 18, 2025

@vinnyperella I am not against bumping version number, but the software has become mature so no new features are being added recently, so I am not sure whether bumping version is beneficial or causes confusion to all downstream packagers.

I remember that ArchLinux bumps the pkgrel number after “-” for dependency-triggered rebuilds. Are they bumping the pkgrel numbers this time or not?

By the way, thank you for doing the chores!

@m13253 m13253 merged commit 6c561eb into m13253:master Nov 18, 2025
1 check passed
@m13253
Copy link
Owner

m13253 commented Nov 18, 2025

Strange. The Docker build job returned a 500 error from GitHub.

https://github.com/m13253/dns-over-https/actions/runs/19480485056/job/55751052613#step:5:1

Is GitHub also impacted by today’s Cloudflare outage? (I don’t think GitHub is using Cloudflare, are they?)

@vinnyperella
Copy link
Contributor Author

vinnyperella commented Nov 18, 2025

@vinnyperella I am not against bumping version number, but the software has become mature so no new features are being added recently, so I am not sure whether bumping version is beneficial or causes confusion to all downstream packagers.

I remember that ArchLinux bumps the pkgrel number after “-” for dependency-triggered rebuilds. Are they bumping the pkgrel numbers this time or not?

By the way, thank you for doing the chores!

Yeah I agree and no it doesn't appear they're bumping the number after the "-" it's still "2.3.10-1" from March 28th 2025. Maybe I'll contact the maintainer as it's listed in the package info and see what's up. And no problem at all I use the client and server a lot and I enjoy making sure things are updated.

Strange. The Docker build job returned a 500 error from GitHub.

https://github.com/m13253/dns-over-https/actions/runs/19480485056/job/55751052613#step:5:1

Is GitHub also impacted by today’s Cloudflare outage? (I don’t think GitHub is using Cloudflare, are they?)

I checked the logs for some reason the URL is not correct when it tries to clone the repo.

92.90 fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/***/dns-over-https.git/': The requested URL returned error: 500

Looking in to see what the problem is I didn't change anything related to this.

@vinnyperella
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you rerun the checks by chance?

@vinnyperella
Copy link
Contributor Author

vinnyperella commented Nov 18, 2025

@m13253 looks like there may have been an issue with github actions around the time the checks were being run specifically for git operations which is what appears to have failed from the logs.

https://www.githubstatus.com/

Snapshot_2025-11-18_16-55-16

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants