Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 3, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
vite (source) 7.1.8 -> 7.1.10 age confidence

Release Notes

vitejs/vite (vite)

v7.1.10

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Documentation
Miscellaneous Chores

v7.1.9

Compare Source

Reverts

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vite-7.x-lockfile branch from 7f9ec38 to 5535188 Compare October 14, 2025 17:07
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vite to v7.1.9 chore(deps): update dependency vite to v7.1.10 Oct 14, 2025
@taj54 taj54 self-requested a review October 19, 2025 17:52
Copy link
Member

@taj54 taj54 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@taj54 taj54 merged commit 28ed566 into main Oct 19, 2025
2 checks passed
@taj54 taj54 deleted the renovate/vite-7.x-lockfile branch October 19, 2025 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants