-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Refactor/monorepo #12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…d web applications, including Nginx configuration for the web app.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
WalkthroughThis PR transforms the project from a single NestJS application into a PNPM-based monorepo with separate applications (server, web, docs) in the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Areas requiring extra attention:
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example instruction:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
.dockerignore (1)
100-102: Clarifypnpm-lock.yamlhandling in Docker builds.The comment states "Keep pnpm-lock.yaml" but the file is not explicitly excluded from the ignore patterns. By default,
pnpm-lock.yamlwill be included in the Docker context since it's not listed in the ignore patterns, which is correct.However, for clarity, consider adding an explicit comment or pattern to make this intent obvious:
# =========================================== # Package manager lock files # =========================================== # Keep pnpm-lock.yaml, ignore others +# pnpm-lock.yaml is included by default package-lock.json yarn.lockDockerfile.bak (1)
14-19: Consider including docs app for completeness.Only
apps/serverandapps/webpackage.json files are copied. If the docs app is also part of the monorepo deployment strategy, consider includingapps/docs/package.jsonas well.If docs is intentionally excluded (e.g., built and deployed separately), consider adding a comment explaining this decision.
package.json (1)
68-72: Consider simplifying lint-staged configuration.The current approach uses
cdcommands which can be fragile. Modern lint-staged supports more direct patterns that work better with monorepos.Apply this diff to use a cleaner approach:
"lint-staged": { - "apps/server/**/*.ts": "cd apps/server && eslint --fix", - "apps/web/**/*.{ts,tsx}": "cd apps/web && eslint --fix", - "apps/docs/**/*.{ts,vue}": "cd apps/docs && prettier --write" + "apps/server/**/*.ts": "eslint --fix", + "apps/web/**/*.{ts,tsx}": "eslint --fix", + "apps/docs/**/*.{ts,vue}": "prettier --write" },Alternatively, configure lint-staged per workspace in each app's package.json for better separation of concerns.
apps/server/.prettierrc (1)
1-4: Consider consolidating Prettier configuration.This minimal server-specific config may conflict with or unexpectedly override the root
.prettierrc. In monorepos, it's typically better to use a single root Prettier config unless there's a specific need for per-app customization.If the formatting rules should be consistent across all apps, consider removing this file and relying solely on the root configuration. Otherwise, ensure this intentionally overrides only the desired options.
apps/web/nginx.conf (1)
1-15: Standard SPA nginx configuration.The configuration correctly:
- Uses
try_fileswith/index.htmlfallback for client-side routing- Serves from the standard nginx document root
- Handles 50x errors appropriately
Consider adding security and performance headers for production use:
server { listen 80; server_name localhost; # Security headers add_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN" always; add_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" always; add_header X-XSS-Protection "1; mode=block" always; # Gzip compression gzip on; gzip_types text/plain text/css application/json application/javascript text/xml application/xml application/xml+rss text/javascript; location / { root /usr/share/nginx/html; index index.html index.htm; try_files $uri $uri/ /index.html; # Cache static assets location ~* \.(js|css|png|jpg|jpeg|gif|ico|svg|woff|woff2|ttf|eot)$ { expires 1y; add_header Cache-Control "public, immutable"; } } error_page 500 502 503 504 /50x.html; location = /50x.html { root /usr/share/nginx/html; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (6)
apps/docs/src/public/nestjs.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgapps/docs/src/public/vitepress-logo.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgapps/web/public/vite.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgapps/web/src/assets/nestjs.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgapps/web/src/assets/react.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
.dockerignore(1 hunks).prettierrc(1 hunks).vscode/settings.json(1 hunks)Dockerfile(0 hunks)Dockerfile.bak(1 hunks)README.md(4 hunks)apps/docs/package.json(1 hunks)apps/server/.gitignore(1 hunks)apps/server/.prettierrc(1 hunks)apps/server/Dockerfile(1 hunks)apps/server/database/manage.ts(1 hunks)apps/server/database/seeds/user.seed.ts(1 hunks)apps/server/package.json(1 hunks)apps/server/scripts/start.sh(1 hunks)apps/web/Dockerfile(1 hunks)apps/web/eslint.config.js(2 hunks)apps/web/nginx.conf(1 hunks)apps/web/package.json(1 hunks)apps/web/src/stores/user.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/vite.config.ts(1 hunks)client/package.json(0 hunks)client/vite.config.ts(0 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)pnpm-workspace.yaml(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- Dockerfile
- client/package.json
- client/vite.config.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/general-rule.mdc)
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Ensure comprehensive strong typing throughout the codebase for type safety in TypeScript
Appropriately use Interfaces and Type Aliases in TypeScript
Write clear and readable type definitions in TypeScript
Use const objects withas constinstead of enums in TypeScript
Employ clear naming conventions, concise logic, and appropriate comments (JSDoc where applicable)
Implement robust error handling mechanisms, returning meaningful error messages
Files:
apps/server/database/manage.tsapps/server/database/seeds/user.seed.tsapps/web/vite.config.tsapps/web/src/stores/user.ts
🧠 Learnings (7)
📚 Learning: 2025-07-17T06:32:55.098Z
Learnt from: fengzai6
Repo: fengzai6/my-first-nest PR: 6
File: package.json:13-13
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T06:32:55.098Z
Learning: In the my-first-nest project, due to multiple folders in the root directory (client, database, scripts, src, test, etc.) and sourceRoot set to "src" in nest-cli.json, the TypeScript compilation preserves the src folder structure. Therefore, src/main.ts compiles to dist/src/main.js, not dist/main.js.
Applied to files:
apps/server/package.jsonapps/docs/package.jsonapps/web/package.jsonREADME.mdpackage.json
📚 Learning: 2025-07-20T09:55:18.180Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: fengzai6/my-first-nest PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/nestjs-rule.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T09:55:18.180Z
Learning: Applies to src/**/*.{controller,dto}.ts : Utilize NestJS Swagger decorators (`Api*`) to ensure clear, accurate, and auto-generated API documentation
Applied to files:
apps/server/package.jsonapps/docs/package.json
📚 Learning: 2025-07-20T09:55:18.180Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: fengzai6/my-first-nest PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/nestjs-rule.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T09:55:18.180Z
Learning: Applies to src/**/*.entity.ts : Clearly define Entities and their relationships (one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-many) when using TypeORM
Applied to files:
apps/server/database/seeds/user.seed.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-07-20T09:55:18.180Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: fengzai6/my-first-nest PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/nestjs-rule.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T09:55:18.180Z
Learning: Follow a modular design with clear separation of concerns (Controllers, Services, Modules, DTOs) in NestJS projects
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-07-20T09:54:55.983Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: fengzai6/my-first-nest PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/client-rule.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T09:54:55.983Z
Learning: Applies to client/**/*.{ts,tsx} : 类型命名采用 PascalCase 命名
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-07-20T09:54:55.983Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: fengzai6/my-first-nest PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/client-rule.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T09:54:55.983Z
Learning: 使用 tailwindcss 进行样式管理
Applied to files:
apps/web/vite.config.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-07-20T09:55:02.802Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: fengzai6/my-first-nest PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/general-rule.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T09:55:02.802Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{ts,tsx} : Ensure comprehensive strong typing throughout the codebase for type safety in TypeScript
Applied to files:
apps/web/eslint.config.js
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
apps/server/database/seeds/user.seed.ts (1)
src/modules/users/entities/user.entity.ts (1)
User(9-74)
🔇 Additional comments (26)
apps/server/database/seeds/user.seed.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM! Import path updated for monorepo.The migration from relative import path to alias-based import (
@/modules/users/entities/user.entity) is correct and aligns with the monorepo structure introduced in this PR..vscode/settings.json (1)
2-4: LGTM! Editor settings enhanced for consistency.The additions ensure consistent code formatting across the monorepo:
- Added project-specific spell check words
- Enforced 2-space indentation
- Disabled auto-detection to prevent inconsistencies
.prettierrc (1)
2-18: Comprehensive Prettier configuration looks good.The expanded configuration provides clear formatting rules across the monorepo, improving code consistency.
apps/docs/package.json (2)
2-4: LGTM! Package metadata updated for monorepo.The scoped package name (
@my-first-nest/docs), version bump, and description are appropriate for the monorepo structure.
11-11: Useful clean script added.The clean script helps maintain a clean build environment by removing both
distand.vitepress/distdirectories..dockerignore (1)
1-128: Excellent, comprehensive .dockerignore structure.The file is well-organized with clear sections and appropriate patterns for a monorepo setup. It properly excludes build artifacts, dependencies, and development files while preserving essential files for Docker builds.
README.md (4)
1-1: LGTM! Title updated to reflect monorepo architecture.The title clearly indicates the new monorepo structure.
24-35: Excellent project introduction for monorepo.The description clearly explains the monorepo architecture, lists all apps (server, web, docs), and highlights the use of PNPM Workspace for package management.
130-199: Comprehensive quick start guide for monorepo.The guide covers:
- Environment requirements with specific versions
- PNPM-based installation
- Per-app and parallel development workflows
- Database operations with workspace filters
- Build commands for all apps
This provides a complete onboarding experience for developers.
249-289: Well-structured project layout documentation.The directory structure clearly shows the monorepo organization with
apps/andpackages/directories, helping developers understand the codebase architecture.Dockerfile.bak (3)
94-96: Good practice: CRLF fix for startup script.Converting Windows line endings and adding execute permissions ensures the startup script works correctly across different development environments.
1-102: Well-structured multi-stage Dockerfile for monorepo.The Dockerfile demonstrates good practices:
- Clear stage separation for building different apps
- Proper layer caching optimization
- Minimal production image size
- Comprehensive comments
Note: This is a
.bakfile, suggesting it may be a backup or alternative approach. Consider clarifying its purpose in the project or removing it if not actively used.
102-102: I need to gather more information about the repository structure and startup mechanisms.I need to search for shell scripts and the active Dockerfile in the repository.
#!/bin/bash # Find all shell scripts and Dockerfiles echo "=== Looking for shell scripts (.sh) ===" fd -e sh -type f echo "" echo "=== Looking for Dockerfile (without .bak) ===" fd -n "^Dockerfile$" -type f echo "" echo "=== Checking if scripts directory exists ===" if [ -d "scripts" ]; then echo "scripts/ directory exists" ls -la scripts/ 2>/dev/null || echo "Cannot list scripts directory" else echo "scripts/ directory does NOT exist" fi echo "" echo "=== Looking for all Dockerfiles ===" fd Dockerfile -type fapps/web/src/stores/user.ts (1)
16-16: Review concern verified:displayNameis properly defined inIUserinterface.The
displayNameproperty is present in theIUserinterface (apps/web/src/services/types/user.ts:24) with typestring, and thedefaultUserobject correctly initializes it with an empty string matching the expected type.package.json (3)
13-30: LGTM! Scripts are properly configured for the monorepo.The scripts correctly use:
pnpm run -rfor recursive workspace operations--filterfor targeting specific packages--parallelfor concurrent development mode- Correct Docker build context and file paths
50-75: Dependencies and engine constraints look reasonable.The devDependencies include appropriate monorepo tooling (ESLint, Prettier, TypeScript) with recent versions. The Node.js engine constraint
>=20.19.5is appropriately strict.
5-12: Monorepo configuration is correct and secure.The pinned pnpm version 10.15.1 has no known security advisories, though v10.22.0 is the current stable release (Nov 12, 2025). Updating to the latest version is optional; the workspace setup and pinned configuration are sound as-is.
pnpm-workspace.yaml (1)
1-3: LGTM! Workspace definition is correct.The workspace patterns match the
workspacesfield in the rootpackage.jsonand follow pnpm monorepo best practices.apps/server/scripts/start.sh (1)
10-14: Paths correctly updated for monorepo structure.The script now references
apps/server/dist/database/manage.jsandapps/server/dist/src/main, which aligns with the monorepo layout. Based on learnings, the NestJS build preserves thesrcfolder structure, soapps/server/dist/src/mainis the correct path.Based on learnings.
apps/server/database/manage.ts (1)
71-71: Good improvement for error handling.Adding
.catch(console.error)ensures unhandled promise rejections from themanage()function are logged instead of silently failing. This improves observability for database initialization failures.apps/server/.gitignore (1)
1-61: LGTM! Comprehensive gitignore for the server app.The patterns appropriately cover:
- Build outputs (dist, node_modules, build, cache)
- Logs and debug files
- Environment variables
- IDE configurations (with VSCode exceptions for shared settings)
- Runtime artifacts
- Lock files (appropriate for pnpm workspaces)
apps/web/eslint.config.js (2)
8-10: LGTM! Ignores configuration correctly updated.Moving from a global ignores import to an inline
ignoresarray is a cleaner approach and achieves the same result.
22-25: Good addition of TypeScript project configuration.Adding
parserOptionswithprojectService: trueandtsconfigRootDirenables better TypeScript type checking in ESLint. This is especially important in a monorepo context where the parser needs to correctly resolve the workspace'stsconfig.json.As per coding guidelines (ensuring comprehensive strong typing).
apps/web/Dockerfile (1)
1-43: Excellent multi-stage Docker build for the web application.The Dockerfile follows best practices for frontend applications:
- Clean separation between build and runtime environments
- PNPM workspace filtering for efficient dependency installation
- Lightweight nginx:alpine for production serving
- Proper build artifact handling
The structure mirrors the server Dockerfile, providing consistency across the monorepo.
apps/web/vite.config.ts (1)
15-16: Update the comment to reflect correct root cause;as anyworkaround remains necessary.The
as anyassertion is still required, but the comment incorrectly attributes the issue to a "pnpm bug." The actual problem is a TypeScript type incompatibility in thehotUpdatehook between@tailwindcss/viteand Vite 6+ plugin interfaces. Per coding guidelines for international collaboration, the comment should include an English explanation instead of only Chinese.Update line 15 to clarify:
// Vite 6+ plugin type incompatibility with @tailwindcss/vite requires type assertion tailwindcss() as any,apps/web/package.json (1)
1-54: Well-structured web application manifest with production-ready dependencies.The package.json follows monorepo best practices with proper scoping (
@my-first-nest/web) and clear script definitions. Dependencies are appropriately separated between production and development. React 19.2.0 is an official, stable release (published Oct 1, 2025) intended for production use, and Vite 7.2.2 is a stable patch release intended for production use and is the current latest 7.x patch. Tailwind CSS 4.1.17 is also correctly configured.
| "endOfLine": "auto", | ||
| "htmlWhitespaceSensitivity": "ignore", | ||
| "jsxSingleQuote": false, | ||
| "trailingComma": "es5", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potential formatting inconsistency across workspace apps.
The root Prettier config sets trailingComma: "es5", but according to the PR context, apps/server/.prettierrc uses trailingComma: "all". This could lead to inconsistent formatting between the server app and other apps in the monorepo.
Consider:
- Standardizing
trailingCommaacross all apps, or - Documenting the intentional per-app formatting differences
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.prettierrc around line 10: the root Prettier config uses "trailingComma": "es5"
while apps/server/.prettierrc uses "trailingComma": "all", causing inconsistent
formatting; either update the root .prettierrc to use "trailingComma": "all" so
all workspace apps inherit the same rule, or explicitly document and keep
per-app differences by adding a note in the repository README (or a new
docs/formatting.md) explaining which apps override the root and why, and ensure
each app-level .prettierrc explicitly declares its trailingComma value to avoid
ambiguity.
| # =========================================== | ||
| # 基础镜像 | ||
| # =========================================== | ||
| FROM node:22-slim AS base | ||
| ENV PNPM_HOME="/pnpm" | ||
| ENV PATH="$PNPM_HOME:$PATH" | ||
| RUN corepack enable | ||
| WORKDIR /app | ||
|
|
||
| # =========================================== | ||
| # 依赖安装阶段 | ||
| # =========================================== | ||
| FROM base AS deps | ||
| COPY package.json pnpm-lock.yaml pnpm-workspace.yaml ./ | ||
| COPY apps/server/package.json ./apps/server/ | ||
| RUN pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --filter @my-first-nest/server... | ||
|
|
||
| # =========================================== | ||
| # 构建阶段 | ||
| # =========================================== | ||
| FROM base AS builder | ||
| COPY --from=deps /app/node_modules ./node_modules | ||
| COPY --from=deps /app/apps/server/node_modules ./apps/server/node_modules | ||
| COPY package.json pnpm-workspace.yaml ./ | ||
| COPY apps/server ./apps/server | ||
| WORKDIR /app/apps/server | ||
| RUN pnpm build | ||
|
|
||
| # =========================================== | ||
| # 生产依赖阶段 | ||
| # =========================================== | ||
| FROM base AS prod-deps | ||
| COPY --from=deps /app/node_modules ./node_modules | ||
| COPY --from=deps /app/apps/server/node_modules ./apps/server/node_modules | ||
| COPY package.json pnpm-lock.yaml pnpm-workspace.yaml ./ | ||
| COPY apps/server/package.json ./apps/server/ | ||
| RUN pnpm prune --prod | ||
|
|
||
| # =========================================== | ||
| # 运行阶段 | ||
| # =========================================== | ||
| FROM base AS runner | ||
| WORKDIR /app | ||
| ENV NODE_ENV=production | ||
|
|
||
| COPY package.json pnpm-workspace.yaml ./ | ||
| COPY apps/server/package.json ./apps/server/ | ||
|
|
||
| # 复制生产依赖 | ||
| COPY --from=prod-deps /app/node_modules ./node_modules | ||
| COPY --from=prod-deps /app/apps/server/node_modules ./apps/server/node_modules | ||
|
|
||
| # 复制构建产物 | ||
| COPY --from=builder /app/apps/server/dist ./apps/server/dist | ||
| COPY --from=builder /app/apps/server/database ./apps/server/database | ||
|
|
||
| # 复制启动脚本 | ||
| COPY apps/server/scripts/start.sh ./apps/server/scripts/start.sh | ||
| RUN sed -i 's/\r$//' ./apps/server/scripts/start.sh && chmod +x ./apps/server/scripts/start.sh | ||
|
|
||
| EXPOSE 3000 | ||
|
|
||
| CMD ["sh", "./apps/server/scripts/start.sh"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
Well-structured multi-stage Docker build.
The Dockerfile follows Docker best practices with clear separation of concerns:
- Efficient layer caching by copying package files first
- PNPM workspace filtering for minimal dependency installation
- Production dependency pruning
- Proper line-ending normalization for cross-platform compatibility
One point to verify: Line 55 copies the database folder to production. Please confirm this is intentional and that the folder doesn't contain development-only files (like migration generation scripts or seed files that shouldn't run in production). If migrations need to run at startup, ensure the start.sh script handles them appropriately.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check contents of database folder to verify what's being copied to production
echo "Contents of database folder:"
fd . apps/server/database --type f --exec echo {}
echo -e "\nChecking start.sh for migration/seed logic:"
cat apps/server/scripts/start.shLength of output: 614
Move database operations outside runtime startup; verify seed execution on container restart.
Based on the database folder contents (seed files for roles, permissions, users) and the start.sh script calling manage.js init on every restart, there's a critical concern:
Seeding code should not be part of normal app execution as this can cause concurrency issues when multiple instances are running. The current setup runs database initialization on every container restart, which can cause:
- Data duplication if
manage.js initincludes seed execution - Concurrency issues in multi-instance deployments
- Unnecessary production artifacts (seed files shouldn't be in production image)
Required actions:
- Verify whether
manage.ts initruns migrations only, or if it also executes seeds - If seeds are included, move seed execution to a separate one-time initialization step (deployment/setup only, not runtime)
- Remove seed files from production image if they're not needed at runtime
- Consider making the
manage.js initcall conditional (e.g., only on first deployment, not every restart)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/server/Dockerfile lines 1-63, the image currently includes the
database/seed files and the container entrypoint runs manage.js init on every
restart; confirm whether manage.ts init runs seeds as well as migrations, and if
it does, remove seed execution from runtime by moving seed scripts to a one-time
deployment/init job (CI/deployment hook or Kubernetes Job) instead of start.sh;
stop copying seed files into the production image (remove COPY --from=builder
/app/apps/server/database ./apps/server/database from the runner stage) so
production containers don't carry seed artifacts; and make the start.sh
invocation of manage.js init conditional (or remove it) so
initialization/migrations are only run once during deployment, not on every
container restart.
| "dependencies": { | ||
| "@nestjs/common": "11.1.0", | ||
| "@nestjs/config": "^4.0.2", | ||
| "@nestjs/core": "11.1.0", | ||
| "@nestjs/jwt": "^11.0.0", | ||
| "@nestjs/mapped-types": "2.1.0", | ||
| "@nestjs/passport": "^11.0.5", | ||
| "@nestjs/platform-express": "11.1.0", | ||
| "@nestjs/serve-static": "^5.0.3", | ||
| "@nestjs/swagger": "11.2.0", | ||
| "@nestjs/typeorm": "^11.0.0", | ||
| "@types/passport-jwt": "^4.0.1", | ||
| "@types/passport-local": "^1.0.38", | ||
| "argon2": "^0.43.0", | ||
| "class-transformer": "^0.5.1", | ||
| "class-validator": "^0.14.2", | ||
| "cookie-parser": "^1.4.7", | ||
| "dotenv": "^17.2.2", | ||
| "es-toolkit": "^1.38.0", | ||
| "joi": "^17.13.3", | ||
| "passport": "^0.7.0", | ||
| "passport-jwt": "^4.0.1", | ||
| "passport-local": "^1.0.0", | ||
| "pg": "^8.15.6", | ||
| "reflect-metadata": "^0.2.0", | ||
| "rxjs": "^7.8.1", | ||
| "typeorm": "^0.3.23" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify dependency versions and security advisories.
Ensure all production dependencies are using secure, up-to-date versions. Pay special attention to security-sensitive packages like @nestjs/jwt, @nestjs/passport, passport-jwt, argon2, and typeorm.
Run the following script to check for outdated packages and known vulnerabilities:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check dependency versions and security advisories for critical packages
# Check for security advisories on key packages
for pkg in "@nestjs/jwt" "@nestjs/passport" "passport-jwt" "passport-local" "argon2" "typeorm" "pg"; do
echo "Checking $pkg..."
gh api graphql -f query="
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: \"$pkg\") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}"
doneLength of output: 2379
Update typeorm dependency to patch high-severity SQL injection vulnerability.
The current version typeorm: ^0.3.23 is vulnerable to a HIGH severity SQL injection vulnerability affecting repository.save() and repository.update() operations, published on 2025-10-29. The vulnerable version range is < 0.3.26, with the first patched version being 0.3.26.
Update apps/server/package.json line 69:
- Change
"typeorm": "^0.3.23"to"typeorm": "^0.3.26"
Other security-sensitive packages (@nestjs/jwt, @nestjs/passport, passport-jwt, passport-local, argon2, and pg) do not have known vulnerabilities in their specified versions.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/server/package.json around lines 43 to 69 the TypeORM dependency is
pinned to "typeorm": "^0.3.23" which is vulnerable; update that entry to
"typeorm": "^0.3.26" to pull in the security patch, then run your package
manager (npm install or yarn install) to update the lockfile (package-lock.json
or yarn.lock) and commit the updated lockfile to ensure the patched version is
used.
| "@types/passport-jwt": "^4.0.1", | ||
| "@types/passport-local": "^1.0.38", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
Move type definitions to devDependencies.
Type definition packages @types/passport-jwt and @types/passport-local are currently in the dependencies section but should be in devDependencies. These packages are only needed during development and compilation, not at runtime.
Apply this diff:
"@nestjs/swagger": "11.2.0",
"@nestjs/typeorm": "^11.0.0",
- "@types/passport-jwt": "^4.0.1",
- "@types/passport-local": "^1.0.38",
"argon2": "^0.43.0",
"class-transformer": "^0.5.1",And add them to devDependencies:
"@types/cookie-parser": "^1.4.9",
"@types/express": "^5.0.0",
"@types/jest": "^29.5.14",
+ "@types/passport-jwt": "^4.0.1",
+ "@types/passport-local": "^1.0.38",
"@types/supertest": "^6.0.2",Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/server/package.json around lines 54-55, the type definition packages
"@types/passport-jwt" and "@types/passport-local" are listed under
"dependencies" but should be moved to "devDependencies"; remove these two
entries from the dependencies section and add them with the same versions into
devDependencies so they are only installed for development/compilation and not
at runtime.
| FROM base AS prod-deps | ||
| # 复制完整的依赖(包括已编译的原生模块) | ||
| COPY --from=deps /app/node_modules ./node_modules | ||
| COPY --from=deps /app/apps/server/node_modules ./apps/server/node_modules | ||
|
|
||
| # 复制 workspace 配置文件 | ||
| COPY package.json pnpm-lock.yaml pnpm-workspace.yaml ./ | ||
| COPY apps/server/package.json ./apps/server/ | ||
|
|
||
| # 移除开发依赖,保留生产依赖 | ||
| RUN pnpm prune --prod |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify pnpm prune --prod behavior in monorepo.
In a PNPM workspace (monorepo), pnpm prune --prod may not work as expected. The command needs to be run with workspace awareness.
Consider using pnpm install --prod --frozen-lockfile in a fresh stage instead of pruning, or verify that pnpm prune --prod correctly handles workspace dependencies.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check PNPM documentation for prune command in workspaces
echo "Searching for PNPM prune documentation..."
echo "Note: In PNPM workspaces, 'pnpm prune' may not work as expected."
echo "Consider using: pnpm install --prod --frozen-lockfile instead"Length of output: 168
🌐 Web query:
Does pnpm prune --prod work correctly in PNPM workspaces?
💡 Result:
Short answer: No — pnpm prune --prod is not supported to run recursively across a workspace/monorepo. Use per-workspace commands or remove node_modules and run pnpm install --prod instead. [1][2]
Sources:
- pnpm prune docs (notes that prune does not support recursive execution on a monorepo). [1]
- pnpm docs (9.x / warning repeated). [2]
Fix pnpm prune --prod command for workspace environment.
In a PNPM workspace (monorepo), pnpm prune --prod does not support recursive execution and will not work as expected. The Dockerfile copies workspace configuration files, indicating a monorepo setup where this command will fail to properly prune development dependencies.
Replace with: pnpm install --prod --frozen-lockfile on a fresh stage, or use per-workspace commands.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Dockerfile.bak around lines 58 to 68, the use of "pnpm prune --prod" in a
PNPM workspace is incorrect because prune is not recursive and won't remove dev
deps in a monorepo; instead run a production install that respects the workspace
lockfile or prune per-package. Replace the prune step by performing a fresh
production install with "pnpm install --prod --frozen-lockfile" in a clean stage
(or loop/execute per-workspace/package installs for apps/server) so only
production dependencies are installed, ensuring you copy only needed
node_modules into the final image.
💻 变更类型 | Change Type
🔀 变更说明 | Description of Change
📝 补充信息 | Additional Information
🔗 关联 Issue | Related Issue
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.