Skip to content

Conversation

@cherryWangY
Copy link
Collaborator

@cherryWangY cherryWangY commented Nov 1, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for the PyTorch backend alongside TensorFlow in the documentation.
    • Introduced a new command for compressing models using PyTorch: dp compress -i model.pth -o model-compress.pth.
  • Documentation

    • Updated the header to reflect both TensorFlow and PyTorch support.
    • Enhanced instructions section with clear guidance for users of both frameworks.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Docs label Nov 1, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the documentation in doc/freeze/compress.md to include support for the PyTorch backend in addition to TensorFlow. The header has been modified to reflect both frameworks, and a new section provides specific instructions for compressing models using PyTorch, including the relevant command. These changes aim to improve clarity and usability for users working with either backend.

Changes

File Change Summary
doc/freeze/compress.md - Updated header to "Supported backends: TensorFlow, PyTorch".
- Added PyTorch command: dp compress -i model.pth -o model-compress.pth.

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: improve multi-backend documentation #3875: The changes in this PR also enhance multi-backend documentation by adding support for PyTorch, which directly relates to the updates made in the main PR regarding PyTorch commands and documentation.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
doc/freeze/compress.md (1)

85-85: Consider clarifying backend-specific parameter behaviors

The parameter explanation section that follows might benefit from noting any differences in parameter behavior between TensorFlow and PyTorch backends, if any exist.

Would you like me to suggest specific additions to the parameter explanation section?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8355947 and d0e6cca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • doc/freeze/compress.md (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
doc/freeze/compress.md (2)

1-1: LGTM: Header updates correctly reflect PyTorch support

The changes appropriately add PyTorch support indicators while maintaining consistency with the existing TensorFlow format.

Also applies to: 4-4


67-84: LGTM: PyTorch instructions are well-structured and consistent

The PyTorch tab and compression command are properly formatted and follow the same pattern as the TensorFlow instructions.

Let's verify the command documentation is complete:

✅ Verification successful

Command documentation is complete and accurate

The documentation for the compression command is well-documented in doc/freeze/compress.md with:

  • Detailed theory and implementation explanation
  • Clear command syntax for both TensorFlow and PyTorch
  • Comprehensive parameter explanations
  • Supported model types and version requirements
  • Performance impact and justification

The PyTorch command follows the same pattern as TensorFlow, using the correct .pt extension, and the documentation provides all necessary context for users.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the compression command help includes PyTorch-specific information
dp compress --help | grep -B2 -A2 "\.pt"

Length of output: 112


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the documentation for any mentions of compression commands
rg -A 3 -B 3 "dp compress" --type md

# Also search for any other compression-related documentation
rg -A 3 -B 3 "compress" --type md

# Look for any command line documentation files
fd -e md -e rst "cli|command|compress"

Length of output: 14979

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.34%. Comparing base (8355947) to head (186b871).
Report is 147 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4299      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.35%   84.34%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         559      559              
  Lines       52509    52509              
  Branches     3054     3054              
==========================================
- Hits        44292    44291       -1     
  Misses       7260     7260              
- Partials      957      958       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
doc/freeze/compress.md (1)

67-84: Consider adding PyTorch-specific information.

The documentation would benefit from additional information about:

  1. Any PyTorch-specific version requirements or limitations
  2. Whether there are any differences in behavior or performance between TensorFlow and PyTorch implementations
  3. Any special considerations when compressing PyTorch models

Would you like me to help draft this additional documentation?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0e6cca and 186b871.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • doc/freeze/compress.md (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
doc/freeze/compress.md (3)

1-1: LGTM: Header and note section updated correctly.

The changes appropriately reflect the addition of PyTorch backend support, maintaining consistent icon usage and formatting.

Also applies to: 4-4


67-84: LGTM: Tab-set structure implemented correctly.

The tab-set structure is well-organized and follows the documentation standards, providing a clear separation between TensorFlow and PyTorch instructions.


79-81: LGTM: PyTorch command example is correct.

The command uses the correct .pth extension as per the project's conventions and maintains consistency with the TensorFlow example format.

Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Merge after #4300.

@njzjz njzjz added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 22123aa Nov 9, 2024
60 checks passed
@cherryWangY cherryWangY deleted the addCompressDoc branch December 5, 2024 14:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants