Skip to content

Conversation

@filipchristiansen
Copy link
Contributor

Potential fix for https://github.com/coderamp-labs/gitingest/security/code-scanning/77

To address this issue, the _parse_local_dir_path function needs to validate the path_str input to ensure it stays within a predefined safe root directory.

  1. Validation Strategy:

    • Define a safe root directory (e.g., TMP_BASE_PATH).
    • Normalize the path using Path.resolve() and ensure the resulting path is a subpath of the safe root directory.
  2. Implementation:

    • Use os.path.commonpath to compare the normalized path to the safe root directory.
    • Raise an exception if the path escapes the root directory.
  3. Changes Required:

    • Modify _parse_local_dir_path in src/gitingest/query_parser.py to include validation logic.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…in path expression

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@filipchristiansen filipchristiansen marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2025 21:38
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR addresses a security vulnerability (code scanning alert no. 77) by implementing path traversal protection in the _parse_local_dir_path function. The change prevents uncontrolled data from being used in path expressions by validating that user-provided paths remain within a safe root directory.

Key Changes:

  • Added path validation logic to prevent directory traversal attacks
  • Implemented safe root directory boundary checking using os.path.commonpath
  • Added exception handling for paths that escape the allowed root directory

A dictionary containing the parsed details of the file path.
"""
root_path = TMP_BASE_PATH.resolve()

This comment was marked as outdated.

Comment on lines 332 to 333
if os.path.commonpath([root_path, path_obj]) != str(root_path):
raise InvalidPatternError(f"Path {path_str} escapes the allowed root directory.")
Copy link

Copilot AI Jul 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The path validation logic has a potential issue: os.path.commonpath() can raise ValueError if the paths are on different drives (Windows) or if the list is empty. Consider wrapping this in a try-except block and also verify that both paths exist before comparison.

Suggested change
if os.path.commonpath([root_path, path_obj]) != str(root_path):
raise InvalidPatternError(f"Path {path_str} escapes the allowed root directory.")
# Ensure both paths exist
if not root_path.exists() or not path_obj.exists():
raise InvalidPatternError(f"One or both paths do not exist: {root_path}, {path_obj}")
# Check if path_obj is within root_path
try:
if os.path.commonpath([root_path, path_obj]) != str(root_path):
raise InvalidPatternError(f"Path {path_str} escapes the allowed root directory.")
except ValueError as e:
raise InvalidPatternError(f"Invalid path comparison: {e}")

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
"""
root_path = TMP_BASE_PATH.resolve()
path_obj = Path(path_str).resolve()
if os.path.commonpath([root_path, path_obj]) != str(root_path):
Copy link

Copilot AI Jul 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comparison converts root_path to string but uses the Path object directly in the commonpath call. This could lead to inconsistent behavior. Consider using str(root_path) consistently or compare Path objects directly.

Suggested change
if os.path.commonpath([root_path, path_obj]) != str(root_path):
if os.path.commonpath([str(root_path), str(path_obj)]) != str(root_path):

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@filipchristiansen filipchristiansen changed the title Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 77: Uncontrolled data used in path expression fix: Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 77: Uncontrolled data used in path expression Jul 15, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

⚙️ Preview environment was undeployed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants