Skip to content

Conversation

@pre-commit-ci
Copy link
Contributor

@pre-commit-ci pre-commit-ci bot commented Nov 10, 2025

updates:


Important

Update rvben/rumdl-pre-commit hook version from v0.0.171 to v0.0.174 in .pre-commit-config.yaml.

  • Pre-commit Hook Update:
    • Update rvben/rumdl-pre-commit hook version from v0.0.171 to v0.0.174 in .pre-commit-config.yaml.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 9898466. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

updates:
- [github.com/rvben/rumdl-pre-commit: v0.0.171 → v0.0.174](rvben/rumdl-pre-commit@v0.0.171...v0.0.174)
@semanticdiff-com
Copy link

semanticdiff-com bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

Changed Files
File Status
  .pre-commit-config.yaml  0% smaller

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 9898466 in 30 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .pre-commit-config.yaml:28
  • Draft comment:
    Bump updated: rumdl-pre-commit version upgraded from v0.0.171 to v0.0.174. Verify any compatibility issues with the new revision.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_SvAyMs6bPvZ72tMo

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

Review Status: Automated Review Skipped

Dear contributor,

Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.

Analysis Result:

PR only contains version updates and formatting changes

Technical Context:

Version and formatting changes detected, which include:

  • Package version updates
  • Dependency version changes
  • Code formatting adjustments
  • Whitespace modifications
  • Structural formatting changes

We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.

Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team

@cleder cleder merged commit e4fa039 into main Nov 11, 2025
4 of 9 checks passed
@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status: Passed

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status: Passed

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status: Passed

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

The managed version of the open source project PR-Agent is sunsetting on the 1st December 2025. The commercial version of this project will remain available and free to use as a hosted service. Install Qodo.

@cleder cleder deleted the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch November 11, 2025 09:54
@qodo-code-review
Copy link

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status:
Not Applicable: The PR only updates a pre-commit hook version and does not add or modify runtime code
where audit logging would apply, so compliance cannot be assessed from this diff.

Referred Code
rev: v0.0.174
hooks:

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status:
Config Context: The change only updates a hook revision in configuration and introduces no new identifiers
to evaluate for naming quality.

Referred Code
rev: v0.0.174
hooks:

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status:
No Runtime Code: The diff does not introduce executable logic or error handling paths; it only changes a
tool version, so robustness cannot be assessed here.

Referred Code
rev: v0.0.174
hooks:

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status:
Not Applicable: No user-facing error messages or logging changes are introduced; only a pre-commit hook
version is updated.

Referred Code
rev: v0.0.174
hooks:

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status:
No Logging Code: The PR does not add or modify application logging; it only updates a pre-commit hook
revision.

Referred Code
rev: v0.0.174
hooks:

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status:
No Input Paths: No changes to input handling or data processing are present; this is a configuration
version bump only.

Referred Code
rev: v0.0.174
hooks:

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants