Skip to content

Conversation

@kazantsev-maksim
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

Part of: #2443

Rationale for this change

Part of: #2443

What changes are included in this PR?

How are these changes tested?

Tested with existing unit tests

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 31, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 93.75000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 58.52%. Comparing base (f09f8af) to head (93c7d3c).
⚠️ Report is 688 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...rc/main/scala/org/apache/comet/serde/statics.scala 92.85% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2671      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     56.12%   58.52%   +2.39%     
- Complexity      976     1444     +468     
============================================
  Files           119      160      +41     
  Lines         11743    13892    +2149     
  Branches       2251     2368     +117     
============================================
+ Hits           6591     8130    +1539     
- Misses         4012     4568     +556     
- Partials       1140     1194      +54     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@andygrove andygrove left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks @kazantsev-maksim

Copy link
Contributor

@comphead comphead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @kazantsev-maksim for the contribution, I was not quite sure about naming statics as looks like it would be a one trick pony as no other statics, but it is okay for now!

@kazantsev-maksim
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andygrove @comphead thanks for the review!

@mbutrovich mbutrovich merged commit fb37d9a into apache:main Nov 12, 2025
102 checks passed
@kazantsev-maksim kazantsev-maksim deleted the refactor_static_invoke branch November 26, 2025 16:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants