Skip to content

Conversation

@lalmeras
Copy link
Contributor

@lalmeras lalmeras commented Nov 3, 2025

SUMMARY

type=table in postgresql_privs can be used to manage view or materialized view privileges.
Make this behavior explicit in postgresql_privs in documentation.

Fixes #841

ISSUE TYPE
  • Docs Pull Reques
COMPONENT NAME

community.postgresql / postgresql_privs

`type=table` in postgresql_privs can be used to manage view or materialized view privileges.

Make this behavior explicit in `postgresql_privs` in documentation.

See ansible-collections#841
@Andersson007 Andersson007 added the backport-3 Put it on PR to backport to stable-3 (only bug/doc fixes) label Nov 4, 2025
@Andersson007 Andersson007 merged commit 91dc150 into ansible-collections:main Nov 5, 2025
36 checks passed
@patchback
Copy link

patchback bot commented Nov 5, 2025

Backport to stable-3: 💚 backport PR created

✅ Backport PR branch: patchback/backports/stable-3/91dc150462dba7625c487a204eaad79bc85a9ac6/pr-892

Backported as #893

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

patchback bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2025
`type=table` in postgresql_privs can be used to manage view or materialized view privileges.

Make this behavior explicit in `postgresql_privs` in documentation.

See #841

(cherry picked from commit 91dc150)
@Andersson007
Copy link
Collaborator

@lalmeras thanks for the contribution!
@andreasscherbaum thanks for reviewing and approving it!

Andersson007 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2025
`type=table` in postgresql_privs can be used to manage view or materialized view privileges.

Make this behavior explicit in `postgresql_privs` in documentation.

See #841

(cherry picked from commit 91dc150)

Co-authored-by: Laurent <lalmeras@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-3 Put it on PR to backport to stable-3 (only bug/doc fixes)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should be able to manage type 'view' in the privs module

3 participants