Skip to content

Conversation

@emilecantin
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@emilecantin emilecantin requested a review from gb0101010101 May 25, 2020 14:40
@emilecantin emilecantin marked this pull request as draft May 25, 2020 16:32
@gb0101010101
Copy link
Contributor

None of this should be committed. The current code in master is correct.

AFAIK this was caused by an unexpected merge of experimental branch into master that has already been fully reverted.

Please let me know if I am missing something and perhaps provide some context to the source of this PR.

@emilecantin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gb0101010101 Well, to quote you from 2 days ago, on #118 :

Just a reminder that these changes have not been committed to Master. Others are submitting PRs based on Master that are causing merge conflicts. Really want this code incorporated as it fixed many issues and required extensive testing.

I opened this PR to track work on that, but you can close it if it's not needed anymore.

@madgrizzle
Copy link
Collaborator

I recall trying to work with @gb0101010101's PR and totally hosed up github due to my lack of github experience. I somehow fixed it and maybe this is an artifact of it. We still need to incorporate @gb0101010101's work.. just don't know how to do it.

@emilecantin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay, so did I not choose the correct branches when creating this? If not, let @gb0101010101 create the correct PR to track this work, a comment in a very stale, closed PR is not a good place to follow that work; we'll forget about it in just a few days (I know I will).

@gb0101010101
Copy link
Contributor

@emilecantin

Sorry for confusion. I think I see what is going on here. You created a PR by merging experimental into master. Somehow the experimental branch got messed up and no longer contains the changes from #118 even though they were committed in 868cf88

I thought you were asking me to review changes that needed to happen before #118 is committed.

The original PRs merged into #118 are #108 #112 #115. None of these are in master.

I will try to resubmit these later.

@emilecantin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, it does seem like the branches got messed up; I originally thought it was just a simple dangling branch that needed to be merged.

Please open a new PR on master with the changes you'd like to see, and we'll track that work there.

Note: it looks like your original pull requests were merged into master, if the changes aren't there anymore it's probably because of a revert. These are a pain to undo, but I believe with a cherry-pick operation to get the specific commits that were in these PRs, you'll be able to re-apply these changes on the current master.

@gb0101010101
Copy link
Contributor

I think I have a clean merge in #117 and will test it later today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants