-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
Integrate changes from the experimental branch #153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
PR attempt
Revert "PR attempt"
|
None of this should be committed. The current code in AFAIK this was caused by an unexpected merge of Please let me know if I am missing something and perhaps provide some context to the source of this PR. |
|
@gb0101010101 Well, to quote you from 2 days ago, on #118 :
I opened this PR to track work on that, but you can close it if it's not needed anymore. |
|
I recall trying to work with @gb0101010101's PR and totally hosed up github due to my lack of github experience. I somehow fixed it and maybe this is an artifact of it. We still need to incorporate @gb0101010101's work.. just don't know how to do it. |
|
Okay, so did I not choose the correct branches when creating this? If not, let @gb0101010101 create the correct PR to track this work, a comment in a very stale, closed PR is not a good place to follow that work; we'll forget about it in just a few days (I know I will). |
|
Sorry for confusion. I think I see what is going on here. You created a PR by merging I thought you were asking me to review changes that needed to happen before #118 is committed. The original PRs merged into #118 are #108 #112 #115. None of these are in I will try to resubmit these later. |
|
Yeah, it does seem like the branches got messed up; I originally thought it was just a simple dangling branch that needed to be merged. Please open a new PR on master with the changes you'd like to see, and we'll track that work there. Note: it looks like your original pull requests were merged into master, if the changes aren't there anymore it's probably because of a revert. These are a pain to undo, but I believe with a |
|
I think I have a clean merge in #117 and will test it later today. |
No description provided.