Skip to content

Conversation

@AkhileshNegi
Copy link
Collaborator

@AkhileshNegi AkhileshNegi commented Dec 17, 2025

Summary

Target issue is #492

Checklist

Before submitting a pull request, please ensure that you mark these task.

  • Ran fastapi run --reload app/main.py or docker compose up in the repository root and test.
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that is tested and has test cases.

Notes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Reworked evaluation backend into service-driven flows for dataset handling and evaluation orchestration.
  • New Features

    • Renamed dataset upload route; improved CSV validation (extension, MIME, size, headers) and robust upload handling.
    • Evaluation start now creates runs via services; status endpoint can return trace scores and supports resync.
  • Documentation

    • Public evaluation endpoints now include clearer docstrings/descriptions.
  • Tests

    • Tests updated to match new service locations.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@AkhileshNegi AkhileshNegi self-assigned this Dec 17, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@AkhileshNegi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 7 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7ba9b43 and 49a2063.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py (10 hunks)

Walkthrough

Refactors evaluation endpoints into service-driven modules: adds evaluation services (dataset, evaluation, validators), moves CSV validation and dataset upload logic into services, replaces in-endpoint orchestration with service calls, and updates route names and exports accordingly.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Service Layer (New / expanded)
backend/app/services/evaluation/__init__.py, backend/app/services/evaluation/dataset.py, backend/app/services/evaluation/evaluation.py, backend/app/services/evaluation/validators.py
New/centralized evaluation service surface. Adds upload_dataset, start_evaluation, build_evaluation_config, get_evaluation_with_scores, and validators (sanitize_dataset_name, validate_csv_file, parse_csv_items). Handles CSV validation/parsing, optional object-store upload, Langfuse interactions, evaluation run creation, and score fetching.
API Route Refactoring
backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py
Endpoints delegate to service functions; upload_dataset renamed to upload_dataset_endpoint; removed in-endpoint CSV parsing and direct Langfuse/OpenAI orchestration; added docstrings and _dataset_to_response mapper.
CRUD Module Exports
backend/app/crud/evaluations/__init__.py
Now imports and re-exports save_score and fetch_trace_scores_from_langfuse; explicit __all__ block removed.
Tests (patch targets updated)
backend/app/tests/api/routes/test_evaluation.py
Updated mocks/patch targets to new service import paths (app.services.evaluation.dataset.*) without behavioral changes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    autonumber
    participant Client
    participant API as Evaluation API
    participant Svc as Dataset Service
    participant Storage as ObjectStore
    participant Langfuse
    participant DB

    Client->>API: POST /evaluation/datasets (file, name, dup_factor)
    API->>Svc: validate_csv_file(file) & sanitize_dataset_name(name)
    Svc->>Svc: parse_csv_items(csv_content)
    alt object store available
        Svc->>Storage: upload_csv -> object_store_url
    end
    Svc->>Langfuse: upload_dataset_to_langfuse(csv_content) -> langfuse_id
    Svc->>DB: create EvaluationDataset(metadata, object_store_url?, langfuse_id)
    Svc-->>API: DatasetUploadResponse
    API-->>Client: 201 Created
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    autonumber
    participant Client
    participant API as Evaluation API
    participant EvalSvc as Evaluation Service
    participant OpenAI
    participant Langfuse
    participant DB

    Client->>API: POST /evaluation/runs (dataset_id, config, assistant_id)
    API->>EvalSvc: start_evaluation(dataset_id, config, assistant_id)
    EvalSvc->>DB: fetch dataset -> verify langfuse_id
    EvalSvc->>EvalSvc: build_evaluation_config (merge assistant config)
    EvalSvc->>DB: create EvaluationRun (status: pending)
    EvalSvc->>Langfuse: start_evaluation_batch(langfuse_dataset_id, config)
    Langfuse-->>EvalSvc: batch started / error
    EvalSvc->>DB: update EvaluationRun (status/external ids)
    EvalSvc-->>API: return EvaluationRun
    API-->>Client: 202 Accepted
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes

  • Focus review on:
    • build_evaluation_config and assistant config merging logic (services/evaluation/evaluation.py)
    • dataset upload workflow, optional object-store behavior, and error handling (services/evaluation/dataset.py)
    • CSV validation/parsing edge cases and MIME/size checks (services/evaluation/validators.py)
    • Route changes and response mapping in api/routes/evaluation.py
    • Export changes in crud/evaluations/__init__.py (absence of explicit all)

Suggested reviewers

  • kartpop
  • avirajsingh7

Poem

🐰 I nibbled logs and parsed each line,
CSV crumbs became a dataset fine,
Langfuse hummed while storage gave a wink,
Runs now sprint where endpoints used to think—
Hop, hop, the services made it shine! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title is vague and overly generic; it uses the term 'Refactor' without specifying what aspect of evaluation is being refactored or the primary change being made. Provide a more specific title that highlights the main change, such as 'Refactor evaluation endpoints to use service-driven architecture' or 'Move evaluation logic from endpoints to service layer.'
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@AkhileshNegi AkhileshNegi added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 17, 2025
@AkhileshNegi AkhileshNegi marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2025 06:53
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py (1)

52-82: Fix event loop blocking: async endpoint calling sync I/O.

The endpoint is async def (required for await validate_csv_file), but line 72 calls the synchronous upload_dataset service, which performs blocking I/O operations (database queries, Langfuse API calls, object store uploads). This blocks FastAPI's event loop and degrades concurrency.

🔎 Recommended fixes (choose one):

Option 1 (simplest): Run the sync service in a thread pool

+from fastapi.concurrency import run_in_threadpool
+
 async def upload_dataset_endpoint(
     ...
 ) -> APIResponse[DatasetUploadResponse]:
     """Upload an evaluation dataset."""
     # Validate and read CSV file
     csv_content = await validate_csv_file(file)
 
     # Upload dataset using service
-    dataset = upload_dataset(
+    dataset = await run_in_threadpool(
+        upload_dataset,
         session=_session,
         csv_content=csv_content,
         dataset_name=dataset_name,
         description=description,
         duplication_factor=duplication_factor,
         organization_id=auth_context.organization.id,
         project_id=auth_context.project.id,
     )
 
     return APIResponse.success_response(data=_dataset_to_response(dataset))

Option 2: Make the service async (requires refactoring service layer)

This would require making upload_dataset and its dependencies async, which is a larger refactor but provides better async integration.

Note: The other endpoints (evaluate, get_evaluation_run_status) are correctly defined as sync (def), so FastAPI automatically runs them in a thread pool.

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
backend/app/services/evaluation/dataset.py (1)

131-138: Consider sanitizing exception details in client-facing error message.

Exposing raw exception messages ({e}) could leak internal implementation details (stack traces, connection strings, etc.) to API clients.

🔎 Apply this diff to provide a generic error message:
     except Exception as e:
         logger.error(
             f"[upload_dataset] Failed to upload dataset to Langfuse | {e}",
             exc_info=True,
         )
         raise HTTPException(
-            status_code=500, detail=f"Failed to upload dataset to Langfuse: {e}"
+            status_code=500, detail="Failed to upload dataset to Langfuse. Please check your Langfuse credentials and try again."
         )
backend/app/services/evaluation/evaluation.py (3)

23-28: Consider more specific type hints for config parameter.

Using dict without type parameters reduces type safety. As per coding guidelines requiring type hints, consider using dict[str, Any] for clarity.

🔎 Apply this diff:
+from typing import Any
+
 def build_evaluation_config(
     session: Session,
-    config: dict,
+    config: dict[str, Any],
     assistant_id: str | None,
     project_id: int,
-) -> dict:
+) -> dict[str, Any]:

101-109: Consider more specific type hints for config parameter here as well.

Same suggestion as build_evaluation_config for consistency.


313-319: Consider sanitizing exception details in error message.

Similar to the dataset service, exposing raw exception messages could leak internal details.

🔎 Apply this diff:
     except Exception as e:
         logger.error(
             f"[get_evaluation_with_scores] Failed to fetch trace info | "
             f"evaluation_id={evaluation_id} | error={e}",
             exc_info=True,
         )
-        return eval_run, f"Failed to fetch trace info from Langfuse: {str(e)}"
+        return eval_run, "Failed to fetch trace info from Langfuse. Please try again later."
backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py (1)

67-67: Consider enriching docstrings with parameter and behavior details.

The added docstrings are present but minimal, mostly restating the function names. For route handlers that delegate to services, consider documenting:

  • Key parameter constraints or validation rules
  • Important response scenarios (e.g., 404 vs 422)
  • Side effects or async behavior notes

Example for upload_dataset_endpoint:

"""
Upload an evaluation dataset from a CSV file.

Validates CSV format and content, uploads to Langfuse and optional object store,
and persists metadata. Runs synchronously in a thread pool to avoid blocking.
"""

This is optional since the Swagger descriptions are loaded from external markdown files.

Also applies to: 96-96, 124-124, 156-156, 200-200, 225-225, 269-269

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d26401b and d990add.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py (10 hunks)
  • backend/app/crud/evaluations/__init__.py (4 hunks)
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/__init__.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/dataset.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/evaluation.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/validators.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/app/tests/api/routes/test_evaluation.py (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
backend/app/services/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Implement business logic in services located in backend/app/services/

Files:

  • backend/app/services/evaluation/validators.py
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/dataset.py
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/__init__.py
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/evaluation.py
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

**/*.py: Always add type hints to all function parameters and return values in Python code
Prefix all log messages with the function name in square brackets: logger.info(f"[function_name] Message {mask_string(sensitive_value)}")
Use Python 3.11+ with type hints throughout the codebase

Files:

  • backend/app/services/evaluation/validators.py
  • backend/app/crud/evaluations/__init__.py
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/dataset.py
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/__init__.py
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/evaluation.py
  • backend/app/tests/api/routes/test_evaluation.py
  • backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py
backend/app/tests/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Use factory pattern for test fixtures in backend/app/tests/

Files:

  • backend/app/tests/api/routes/test_evaluation.py
backend/app/api/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

backend/app/api/**/*.py: Define FastAPI REST endpoints in backend/app/api/ organized by domain
Load Swagger endpoint descriptions from external markdown files instead of inline strings using load_description("domain/action.md")

Files:

  • backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (4)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/__init__.py (2)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/core.py (1)
  • save_score (259-295)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/langfuse.py (1)
  • fetch_trace_scores_from_langfuse (304-543)
backend/app/services/evaluation/__init__.py (3)
backend/app/services/evaluation/dataset.py (1)
  • upload_dataset (24-163)
backend/app/services/evaluation/evaluation.py (2)
  • build_evaluation_config (23-98)
  • get_evaluation_with_scores (229-329)
backend/app/services/evaluation/validators.py (2)
  • parse_csv_items (118-174)
  • sanitize_dataset_name (23-68)
backend/app/services/evaluation/evaluation.py (7)
backend/app/crud/assistants.py (1)
  • get_assistant_by_id (19-30)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/core.py (3)
  • create_evaluation_run (14-61)
  • get_evaluation_run_by_id (103-141)
  • save_score (259-295)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/langfuse.py (1)
  • fetch_trace_scores_from_langfuse (304-543)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/dataset.py (1)
  • get_dataset_by_id (107-140)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/batch.py (1)
  • start_evaluation_batch (118-212)
backend/app/models/evaluation.py (1)
  • EvaluationRun (170-319)
backend/app/utils.py (2)
  • get_langfuse_client (212-248)
  • get_openai_client (179-209)
backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py (3)
backend/app/services/evaluation/evaluation.py (1)
  • get_evaluation_with_scores (229-329)
backend/app/services/evaluation/dataset.py (1)
  • upload_dataset (24-163)
backend/app/services/evaluation/validators.py (1)
  • validate_csv_file (71-115)
🔇 Additional comments (29)
backend/app/tests/api/routes/test_evaluation.py (7)

56-64: LGTM! Mock paths correctly updated to reflect service layer refactoring.

The patch targets are properly updated from app.api.routes.evaluation.* to app.services.evaluation.dataset.*, aligning with the new service-oriented architecture.


142-150: Mock paths consistently updated for empty rows test.


188-196: Mock paths consistently updated for default duplication test.


229-237: Mock paths consistently updated for custom duplication test.


270-278: Mock paths consistently updated for description test.


362-370: Mock paths consistently updated for boundary minimum test.


407-410: Mock paths consistently updated for Langfuse configuration failure test.

backend/app/crud/evaluations/__init__.py (3)

4-9: LGTM! Properly exports save_score from core module.

The new export aligns with the service layer's need to persist evaluation scores.


26-31: LGTM! Properly exports fetch_trace_scores_from_langfuse from langfuse module.

This enables the evaluation service to retrieve trace scores via the CRUD layer's public API.


39-70: LGTM! __all__ correctly updated with new exports.

Both save_score and fetch_trace_scores_from_langfuse are properly listed in the appropriate sections.

backend/app/services/evaluation/validators.py (4)

13-20: LGTM! Well-defined security constants.

Clear file upload limits with appropriate MIME type allowances including text/plain for compatibility.


23-68: LGTM! Well-documented sanitization with comprehensive rules.

The function handles edge cases properly, includes clear examples in the docstring, and follows coding guidelines with type hints.


100-115: LGTM! Thorough file size validation.

Properly seeks to end for size check and resets position before reading.


118-174: LGTM! Robust CSV parsing with case-insensitive headers.

Good approach to normalize headers while preserving original column names for row access. Properly filters empty rows and re-raises HTTPException without wrapping.

backend/app/services/evaluation/dataset.py (4)

24-32: LGTM! Well-typed function signature.

All parameters have proper type hints including the union type for optional description. As per coding guidelines, type hints are correctly applied.


58-74: LGTM! Proper sanitization with informative logging.

Logging follows the [function_name] prefix convention as per coding guidelines.


86-108: LGTM! Graceful degradation for object store failures.

Non-fatal handling allows the workflow to continue when object storage is unavailable, which is appropriate for optional storage backends.


140-163: LGTM! Clean metadata construction and database persistence.

The metadata structure is well-organized and the final logging confirms successful creation.

backend/app/services/evaluation/__init__.py (1)

1-32: LGTM! Clean public API surface definition.

Well-organized exports with clear categorization. The __all__ list provides a clear contract for the evaluation services package.

backend/app/services/evaluation/evaluation.py (8)

47-86: LGTM! Robust assistant config merging logic.

Properly handles the merge precedence where provided config values override assistant values, and conditionally adds tools when vector stores are available.


88-98: LGTM! Proper validation for direct config usage.

Clear error message when model is missing and no assistant_id is provided.


142-170: LGTM! Thorough dataset validation with clear error messages.

Properly validates both dataset existence and Langfuse ID presence before proceeding.


179-200: LGTM! Clean client initialization and evaluation run creation.

Follows the documented workflow steps clearly.


229-236: LGTM! Well-typed return signature.

The tuple[EvaluationRun | None, str | None] return type clearly communicates the possible outcomes.


276-286: LGTM! Proper caching logic for trace scores.

Correctly checks both completion status and existing cached scores before fetching from Langfuse.


321-329: LGTM! Clean score persistence flow.

Uses the separate-session save_score function correctly to persist scores after the primary fetch operation.


219-226: The error handling behavior is correct and intentional. start_evaluation_batch properly sets status = "failed" with an error_message before re-raising the exception. The exception is then caught in start_evaluation, and session.refresh(eval_run) retrieves the updated failure state from the database. The approach is sound—error details are persisted before exception propagation, ensuring the evaluation run maintains failure context when returned to the caller.

backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py (2)

1-23: LGTM: Clean service-oriented refactoring.

The refactoring to delegate business logic to service modules improves separation of concerns and maintainability. The route handlers are now thin wrappers focused on HTTP concerns.


294-295: Graceful degradation pattern is intentional and well-designed.

Lines 294-295 correctly use APIResponse.failure_response(), which is explicitly designed to support returning data alongside errors. The failure_response() method signature includes an optional data: Optional[T] = None parameter, and the response is constructed with both success=False, error=error_message, and data=data. This pattern is appropriate for cases where the evaluation run exists but additional enrichment (like trace info) fails, allowing clients to receive partial data along with error context.

Comment on lines +84 to +90
# Security validation: Check file extension
file_ext = Path(file.filename).suffix.lower()
if file_ext not in ALLOWED_EXTENSIONS:
raise HTTPException(
status_code=422,
detail=f"Invalid file type. Only CSV files are allowed. Got: {file_ext}",
)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Handle potential None filename.

file.filename can be None for certain upload scenarios. Path(None) will raise TypeError.

🔎 Apply this diff to handle None filename:
     # Security validation: Check file extension
+    if not file.filename:
+        raise HTTPException(
+            status_code=422,
+            detail="File must have a filename",
+        )
     file_ext = Path(file.filename).suffix.lower()
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/app/services/evaluation/validators.py around lines 84 to 90,
file.filename can be None which makes Path(file.filename) raise TypeError; guard
against a missing filename first and return the same 422 HTTPException with a
clear message if it's None (e.g., "Missing filename or invalid upload"),
otherwise safely compute the suffix (lowercased) from the filename and continue
the existing allowed-extension check and error path.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py (1)

51-81: Add logging to endpoint and address blocking I/O pattern.

Two issues found:

  1. Missing logging: This endpoint lacks logging despite other endpoints in the file logging operations with [function_name] prefix. Per coding guidelines, add a log statement prefixed with [upload_dataset_endpoint].

  2. Blocking I/O in async context: upload_dataset is a synchronous function that performs blocking I/O operations (database writes, object store uploads, Langfuse API calls). Calling it directly in an async endpoint blocks the event loop. Consider wrapping it with asyncio.to_thread() or refactoring the service function to be async.

Suggested fix for logging:

async def upload_dataset_endpoint(
    ...
) -> APIResponse[DatasetUploadResponse]:
    """Upload an evaluation dataset."""
+   logger.info(
+       f"[upload_dataset_endpoint] Uploading dataset | "
+       f"name={dataset_name} | org_id={auth_context.organization.id} | "
+       f"project_id={auth_context.project.id}"
+   )
    # Validate and read CSV file
    csv_content = await validate_csv_file(file)

    # Upload dataset using service
    dataset = upload_dataset(
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py (4)

33-43: Add type hint for dataset parameter.

The dataset parameter is missing a type hint. As per coding guidelines, all function parameters should have type hints.

🔎 Suggested fix:
-def _dataset_to_response(dataset) -> DatasetUploadResponse:
+def _dataset_to_response(dataset: "Dataset") -> DatasetUploadResponse:

You'll need to import the Dataset model or use the appropriate type from your models. If you want to avoid a circular import, you can use a string annotation or TYPE_CHECKING block.


89-110: Add logging for list operation.

This endpoint lacks logging. Per coding guidelines, consider adding a log statement prefixed with [list_datasets_endpoint] to track dataset listing operations.

🔎 Suggested addition:
 def list_datasets_endpoint(
     ...
 ) -> APIResponse[list[DatasetUploadResponse]]:
     """List evaluation datasets."""
+    logger.info(
+        f"[list_datasets_endpoint] Listing datasets | "
+        f"org_id={auth_context.organization.id} | "
+        f"project_id={auth_context.project.id} | limit={limit} | offset={offset}"
+    )
     # Enforce maximum limit
     if limit > 100:
         limit = 100

186-210: Add logging for evaluation start.

This endpoint lacks logging for the evaluation start operation. Starting an evaluation is a significant action that should be logged for observability and debugging purposes.

🔎 Suggested addition:
 def evaluate(
     ...
 ) -> APIResponse[EvaluationRunPublic]:
     """Start an evaluation run."""
+    logger.info(
+        f"[evaluate] Starting evaluation | dataset_id={dataset_id} | "
+        f"experiment_name={experiment_name} | assistant_id={assistant_id} | "
+        f"org_id={auth_context.organization.id} | project_id={auth_context.project.id}"
+    )
     eval_run = start_evaluation(

247-296: Add logging for evaluation status fetch.

This endpoint lacks logging. Consider adding a log statement prefixed with [get_evaluation_run_status] for consistency with other endpoints like get_dataset.

🔎 Suggested addition:
 def get_evaluation_run_status(
     ...
 ) -> APIResponse[EvaluationRunPublic]:
     """Get evaluation run status with optional trace info."""
+    logger.info(
+        f"[get_evaluation_run_status] Fetching evaluation | id={evaluation_id} | "
+        f"get_trace_info={get_trace_info} | resync_score={resync_score} | "
+        f"org_id={auth_context.organization.id}"
+    )
     if resync_score and not get_trace_info:
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d990add and 8e5ba77.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py (10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
backend/app/api/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

backend/app/api/**/*.py: Define FastAPI REST endpoints in backend/app/api/ organized by domain
Load Swagger endpoint descriptions from external markdown files instead of inline strings using load_description("domain/action.md")

Files:

  • backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

**/*.py: Always add type hints to all function parameters and return values in Python code
Prefix all log messages with the function name in square brackets: logger.info(f"[function_name] Message {mask_string(sensitive_value)}")
Use Python 3.11+ with type hints throughout the codebase

Files:

  • backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py (2)

113-142: LGTM!

Proper logging with [get_dataset] prefix, complete type hints, and appropriate error handling for the 404 case.


145-178: LGTM!

Proper logging with [delete_dataset] prefix at entry and exit. Type hints are complete.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/__init__.py (1)

1-37: Add an explicit __all__ list to declare the public API.

Per PEP 8, modules should explicitly declare the names in their public API using the __all__ attribute. This module currently imports 21+ functions from six submodules without defining __all__, which means all imported names become part of the public API by default. Using __all__ allows you to explicitly specify the public interface of your packages and modules and prevents accidental usage of objects that shouldn't be used from outside the module. Define an __all__ list after the module docstring containing the functions intended as part of the public API.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e5ba77 and 7ba9b43.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/app/crud/evaluations/__init__.py (2 hunks)
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/__init__.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • backend/app/services/evaluation/init.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

**/*.py: Always add type hints to all function parameters and return values in Python code
Prefix all log messages with the function name in square brackets: logger.info(f"[function_name] Message {mask_string(sensitive_value)}")
Use Python 3.11+ with type hints throughout the codebase

Files:

  • backend/app/crud/evaluations/__init__.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/__init__.py (2)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/core.py (1)
  • save_score (259-295)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/langfuse.py (1)
  • fetch_trace_scores_from_langfuse (304-543)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/app/crud/evaluations/__init__.py (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The import of save_score is correctly added and maintains alphabetical ordering with other imports from the core module.


28-28: LGTM!

The import of fetch_trace_scores_from_langfuse is correctly added and maintains alphabetical ordering with other imports from the langfuse module.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 65.77540% with 64 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
backend/app/services/evaluation/evaluation.py 34.28% 46 Missing ⚠️
backend/app/services/evaluation/validators.py 83.05% 10 Missing ⚠️
backend/app/services/evaluation/dataset.py 84.09% 7 Missing ⚠️
backend/app/api/routes/evaluation.py 90.90% 1 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants