Documentation : repo enhancement #496
Conversation
WalkthroughRebrands the project to "Kaapi"; updates CI workflow names and Python matrix to 3.12; adds an enhancement issue template; removes Traefik-related comments from Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
nishika26
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml (1)
18-18: Consider updating the test database name for consistency.The test database is still named
ai_platform_test, which is inconsistent with the rebranding to Kaapi. Consider renaming it tokaapi_testfor consistency.Apply this diff to align with the rebranding:
- POSTGRES_DB: ai_platform_test + POSTGRES_DB: kaapi_testNote: Ensure any related test configurations or scripts are updated accordingly if you make this change.
development.md (1)
124-138: Consider wrapping bare URLs for better markdown compliance.The new "Development URLs" section is a helpful addition. However, the bare URLs could be wrapped in angle brackets to comply with markdown best practices and improve readability.
Apply this diff to wrap the URLs:
-**Backend**: http://localhost:8000 +**Backend**: <http://localhost:8000> -**Swagger UI** (Interactive API Docs): http://localhost:8000/docs +**Swagger UI** (Interactive API Docs): <http://localhost:8000/docs> -**ReDoc** (Alternative API Docs): http://localhost:8000/redoc +**ReDoc** (Alternative API Docs): <http://localhost:8000/redoc> -**Adminer** (Database Management): http://localhost:8080 +**Adminer** (Database Management): <http://localhost:8080> -**RabbitMQ Management**: http://localhost:15672 (username: guest, password: guest) +**RabbitMQ Management**: <http://localhost:15672> (username: guest, password: guest) -**Celery Flower** (Task Monitoring): http://localhost:5555 +**Celery Flower** (Task Monitoring): <http://localhost:5555>Note: This also applies to lines 17, 19, 21, and 23 earlier in the document.
README.md (1)
4-8: Badge URLs updated correctly; consider adding alt text for accessibility.All badge URLs have been correctly updated from
ai-platformtokaapi-backend. However, the CI badge on Line 4 is missing alt text, which affects accessibility.Apply this diff to add descriptive alt text:
- +deployment.md (2)
17-17: Update generic "FastAPI project" references to align with Kaapi branding.The file still references "FastAPI project" generically on line 17 and throughout the environment variables section (lines 39–48). For consistency with the rebranding to "Kaapi," these references should be updated to be Kaapi-specific or made more general.
Examples of updates needed:
- Line 17: "You can deploy your FastAPI project with Docker Compose." → "You can deploy Kaapi with Docker Compose."
- Line 39: "The name of the project, used in the API for the docs and emails." → "The name of the Kaapi application, used in the API for the docs and emails."
Also applies to: 39-48
111-124: Update example domain references to align with Kaapi rebranding.The URLs section still uses the generic placeholder
fastapi-project.example.comthroughout. Consider updating these to a Kaapi-aligned domain placeholder for better clarity and consistency with the rebranding.Example update:
-Frontend: `https://dashboard.fastapi-project.example.com` -Backend API docs: `https://api.fastapi-project.example.com/docs` -Backend API base URL: `https://api.fastapi-project.example.com` -Adminer: `https://adminer.fastapi-project.example.com` +Frontend: `https://dashboard.your-domain.com` +Backend API docs: `https://api.your-domain.com/docs` +Backend API base URL: `https://api.your-domain.com` +Adminer: `https://adminer.your-domain.com`This makes it clearer that users should replace these with their actual domain.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
.env.example(0 hunks).github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/enhancement_request.md(1 hunks).github/workflows/cd-production.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/cd-staging.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml(2 hunks)CONTRIBUTING.md(3 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)backend/README.md(4 hunks)deployment.md(1 hunks)development.md(4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .env.example
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md
4-4: Images should have alternate text (alt text)
(MD045, no-alt-text)
development.md
17-17: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
19-19: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
21-21: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
23-23: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
128-128: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
130-130: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
132-132: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
134-134: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
136-136: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
138-138: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: checks (3.12, 6)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
.github/workflows/cd-production.yml (1)
1-1: LGTM!The workflow name has been correctly updated to reflect the Kaapi branding. All deployment logic remains unchanged.
.github/workflows/cd-staging.yml (1)
1-1: LGTM!The workflow name has been correctly updated to reflect the Kaapi branding, consistent with the production workflow.
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/enhancement_request.md (1)
1-23: LGTM!The enhancement request template is well-structured with clear sections guiding contributors to provide comprehensive information about proposed improvements.
.github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml (1)
1-1: LGTM!The workflow name has been correctly updated to reflect the Kaapi branding.
development.md (3)
1-1: LGTM!The title has been correctly updated to reflect the Kaapi branding.
17-23: LGTM!Great additions documenting the ReDoc, RabbitMQ Management UI, and Celery Flower endpoints. These help developers discover all available services during development.
43-56: LGTM!Good corrections here:
- Updated service reference from "frontend" to "backend" (Line 43)
- Corrected the command to
fastapi run --reloadfor development with auto-reload (Line 53)These changes improve the accuracy of the development documentation.
README.md (1)
1-1: LGTM!The title has been correctly updated to reflect the Kaapi branding.
CONTRIBUTING.md (3)
1-22: LGTM!The branding has been correctly updated throughout the introduction and setup sections, with all repository references pointing to
kaapi-backend.
24-31: Excellent addition to the contribution workflow!The new "Check for Existing Issues" section provides clear guidance for contributors to check for and create issues before starting work. This helps prevent duplicate efforts and aligns well with the new enhancement request template.
51-68: LGTM!Great additions:
- The "Verify Application Functionality" section encourages contributors to test their changes before submitting (Lines 51-56)
- Updated PR linking guidance is clear and concise (Line 68)
These changes improve the quality and process of contributions.
backend/README.md (5)
1-1: LGTM!The title has been correctly updated to reflect the Kaapi branding.
30-30: LGTM!The path references have been correctly updated from specific files (
models.py,crud.py) to directories (models/,crud/), reflecting a more modular code organization.
32-38: LGTM!The new "Seed Database (Optional)" section is a helpful addition that improves the developer onboarding experience by providing clear instructions for populating baseline data.
102-121: LGTM!The new "Setup Test Environment" section provides comprehensive guidance for test configuration, including:
- Creating
.env.testfrom the template- Setting
ENVIRONMENT=testing- Using a separate test database (good practice)
The updated test command reference is also correct.
160-160: LGTM!The Alembic import path reference has been correctly updated from
./backend/app/models.pyto./backend/app/models/, consistent with the modular directory structure.deployment.md (1)
84-95: Verify consistency: secrets list vs. AI summary removal claims.The AI summary states that
EMAILS_FROM_EMAILandFIRST_SUPERUSER_PASSWORDwere removed from the documentation, but they still appear in the secrets list on lines 90–92. Verify whether:
- These variables should actually remain (and the summary is outdated), or
- They should be removed to align with the refactoring goals.
If these secrets should be removed, apply this diff:
* `DOMAIN_PRODUCTION` * `DOMAIN_STAGING` * `STACK_NAME_PRODUCTION` * `STACK_NAME_STAGING` -* `EMAILS_FROM_EMAIL` * `FIRST_SUPERUSER` -* `FIRST_SUPERUSER_PASSWORD` * `POSTGRES_PASSWORD` * `SECRET_KEY`
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
deployment.md (5)
48-49: Clarify the purpose and scope of theAWS_ENV_VARSenvironment.The documentation states to create an environment named
AWS_ENV_VARSand optionally add protection rules, but doesn't explain what this environment controls or why it's specifically named. Clarify whether this environment protects staging deployments, both environments, or serves another purpose.Consider revising to:
-3. Name it: `AWS_ENV_VARS` -4. Optionally, add protection rules (e.g., required reviewers) +3. Name it: `AWS_ENV_VARS` (protects deployment workflows for staging and production) +4. Optionally, add protection rules (e.g., required reviewers for production deployments)
160-161: Improve shell command formatting for cross-platform compatibility.The Python one-liner uses nested quotes which may have compatibility issues on Windows or within certain CI/CD environments. Use a code block wrapper or alternative syntax for robustness.
Revise to:
-```bash -python -c "import secrets; print(secrets.token_urlsafe(32))" -``` +```bash +python -c 'import secrets; print(secrets.token_urlsafe(32))' +``` + +Or create a small script: +```bash +cat > generate_key.py << 'EOF' +import secrets +print(secrets.token_urlsafe(32)) +EOF +python generate_key.py +```
69-69: Capitalize "GitHub" per official branding.The static analysis tool flagged that the official name is "GitHub" (not "Github"). Update lines 69 and 93 to match official branding.
-**Workflow Steps** (`.github/workflows/cd-staging.yml`): +**Workflow Steps** (`.github/workflows/cd-staging.yml`):And:
-**Workflow Steps** (`.github/workflows/cd-production.yml`): +**Workflow Steps** (`.github/workflows/cd-production.yml`):Also applies to: 93-93
199-199: Standardize placeholder syntax for consistency.Line 199 uses
{cluster}/{service}while other sections use{prefix}. Standardize the placeholder format to reduce confusion.-aws logs tail /ecs/{cluster}/{service} --follow +aws logs tail /ecs/{AWS_RESOURCE_PREFIX}-cluster/{AWS_RESOURCE_PREFIX}-service --followOr add a note explaining the mapping between placeholders and actual resource naming.
212-212: Add brief guidance on health check endpoint configuration.Line 212 references the
/api/v1/utils/health/endpoint for ECS health checks but doesn't explain how to configure this in the ECS Task Definition or what happens if the endpoint is unavailable. A brief note would help readers understand the deployment behavior.Consider adding:
+### Health Checks + +ECS performs health checks on the `/api/v1/utils/health/` endpoint. If this fails, tasks are replaced automatically. + +**Configuration**: This endpoint is configured in the ECS Task Definition. Ensure the application is running and responding to health checks before completing deployments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.env.example(0 hunks)backend/README.md(4 hunks)deployment.md(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .env.example
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
deployment.md
[uncategorized] ~69-~69: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...sh origin main ``` Workflow Steps (.github/workflows/cd-staging.yml): 1. **Checko...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~93-~93: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... origin v1.0.0 ``` Workflow Steps (.github/workflows/cd-production.yml): 1. **Che...
(GITHUB)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: checks (3.12, 6)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
deployment.md (1)
1-9: ✅ Well-structured AWS-centric deployment documentation.The rebranding to Kaapi and shift from Traefik to AWS/ECS is clearly communicated. The architecture overview provides good context for readers unfamiliar with the new setup.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
deployment.md (1)
1-10: First past review comment appears resolved.The previous concern about ambiguous configuration instructions at line 7 (after Traefik removal) has been effectively addressed. The new structure clearly lists prerequisites (lines 29–42) and GitHub setup steps (lines 44–49), removing the vague phrasing. The document now explicitly enumerates what must be configured before deployment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
deployment.md (1)
195-200: Optional: Add explicit region parameter to CloudWatch logs command for clarity.The CloudWatch logs command at line 199 lacks an explicit
--regionflag. While it will use your AWS CLI default region, adding it explicitly (with placeholder) improves consistency with other commands in the document:-aws logs tail /ecs/{cluster}/{service} --follow +aws logs tail /ecs/{cluster}/{service} --follow --region {YOUR_AWS_REGION}This is a minor improvement for consistency and clarity.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
deployment.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
deployment.md
[uncategorized] ~69-~69: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...sh origin main ``` Workflow Steps (.github/workflows/cd-staging.yml): 1. **Checko...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~93-~93: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... origin v1.0.0 ``` Workflow Steps (.github/workflows/cd-production.yml): 1. **Che...
(GITHUB)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: checks (3.12, 6)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
deployment.md (1)
103-139: GitHub configuration section is clear and actionable.The step-by-step setup for GitHub environments, variables, and OIDC authentication is well-structured and easy to follow. The use of
{YOUR_AWS_ACCOUNT_ID}and{YOUR_AWS_REGION}placeholders with explicit notes (line 138) successfully addresses the previous concern about hard-coded values. Users are clearly instructed to customize these for their environment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
deployment.md (2)
49-49: Clarify the placeholder convention for AWS resource prefix.The documentation sets up
AWS_RESOURCE_PREFIXas a variable (line 122: "Your AWS resource prefix (e.g.,kaapi)"), but then uses the placeholder{prefix}in AWS CLI commands without explicitly stating that{prefix}should be replaced with the value ofAWS_RESOURCE_PREFIX. This inconsistency may confuse readers about what to substitute.Consider adding a clarification note or updating the examples to use a consistent naming convention. For example:
+**Note on placeholders**: In the AWS CLI examples below, replace: +- `{prefix}` with the value you set for `AWS_RESOURCE_PREFIX` (e.g., `kaapi`) +- `{YOUR_AWS_REGION}` with your AWS region (e.g., `ap-south-1`) +Alternatively, use
{AWS_RESOURCE_PREFIX}instead of{prefix}for clarity:- --cluster {prefix}-cluster \ + --cluster {AWS_RESOURCE_PREFIX}-cluster \Also applies to: 122-122, 174-177, 220-231
74-76: Clarify the deployment "force" mechanism in ECS.Lines 74–76 and 98–99 mention "Force ECS to pull and deploy the new image," but this is vague. ECS doesn't automatically re-pull images with the same tag unless explicitly told to do so. Clarify how the workflow triggers the deployment (e.g., using the
force-new-deploymentflag or by updating the task definition revision).For clarity, consider revising to:
-6. **Deploy**: Force ECS to pull and deploy the new image +6. **Deploy**: Update the ECS service to use the new image version, triggering a rolling deploymentOr, if the workflow uses
force-new-deployment, document that in the workflow steps.Also applies to: 98-99
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
deployment.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
deployment.md
[uncategorized] ~69-~69: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...sh origin main ``` Workflow Steps (.github/workflows/cd-staging.yml): 1. **Checko...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~93-~93: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... origin v1.0.0 ``` Workflow Steps (.github/workflows/cd-production.yml): 1. **Che...
(GITHUB)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: checks (3.12, 6)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/enhancement_request.mddevelopment.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/enhancement_request.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
development.md
17-17: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
19-19: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
21-21: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
23-23: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
85-85: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
97-97: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
121-121: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
124-124: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
202-202: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
204-204: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
206-206: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
208-208: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
210-210: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
212-212: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: checks (3.12, 6)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
development.md (2)
58-130: Excellent addition of comprehensive local setup instructions.The new "Running Completely Without Docker" section directly addresses the past review comment requesting Celery and RabbitMQ setup steps for manual development. The step-by-step instructions for macOS and Ubuntu/Debian are clear and cover all necessary services (RabbitMQ, Redis, Celery worker, and optional Flower monitoring).
The warning note about Flower at lines 123–128 is helpful context for developers who might encounter false positives when starting services out of order.
1-56: Clear separation of Docker Compose and local development workflows.The documentation now clearly distinguishes three development scenarios:
- Docker Compose (lines 3–37): Quick start with pre-configured services.
- Local Development with partial Docker (lines 39–56): Running backend locally while keeping services in Docker.
- Fully local setup (lines 58–130): Complete manual setup without Docker.
The addition of ReDoc, RabbitMQ Management UI, and Celery Flower to the Docker Compose URLs (lines 17, 21, 23) is consistent with the removal of Traefik references noted in the PR summary.
Also applies to: 198-212
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
development.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
development.md
[grammar] ~13-~13: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...interact with these URLs: Backend, JSON based web API based on OpenAPI: <http://...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: checks (3.12, 6)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
development.md (2)
58-130: Excellent addition of comprehensive local development setup.This new section directly addresses the prior feedback about documenting Celery and RabbitMQ setup. The instructions are well-structured with platform-specific guidance (macOS/Ubuntu) and clear next steps.
Strengths:
- Clear separation of Docker vs. local setups
- Helpful verification steps (e.g.,
redis-cli ping)- Good service startup order (backend → worker → flower)
- Useful warning about Flower initialization behavior
198-212: Well-organized consolidation of development endpoints.The new "Development URLs" section provides a single reference for all localhost services, improving developer ergonomics. The layout is consistent and all URLs are properly formatted.
Summary
Target issue is #491 and #485
Checklist
Before submitting a pull request, please ensure that you mark these task.
fastapi run --reload app/main.pyordocker compose upin the repository root and test.Notes
Please add here if any other information is required for the reviewer.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.