Skip to content

Conversation

@verhovsky
Copy link
Contributor

@verhovsky verhovsky commented Dec 2, 2025

This variable is referenced later by the correct name.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected a property name typo in the create-invoice action.
  • Chores

    • Version bumps: component version 0.1.0 → 0.1.1, action version 0.0.1 → 0.0.2.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 2, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit Ignored Ignored Dec 2, 2025 6:15am

@pipedream-component-development
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you so much for submitting this! We've added it to our backlog to review, and our team has been notified.

@pipedream-component-development
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for submitting this PR! When we review PRs, we follow the Pipedream component guidelines. If you're not familiar, here's a quick checklist:

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request corrects a typo in the create-invoice action's public property name from recipientNmae to recipientName, increments the action version to 0.0.2, and bumps the package version to 0.1.1 to reflect the public API change.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Create Invoice Action
components/e_conomic/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs
Property recipientNmae renamed to recipientName (typo correction). Action version incremented from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2.
Package Metadata
components/e_conomic/package.json
Package version incremented from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Straightforward typo fix in public property with corresponding version bump
  • Single file with minimal logic changes
  • Clear and low-risk modification

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning No pull request description was provided; the repository template requires at least a 'WHY' section explaining the rationale for changes. Add a description explaining why the variable name fix and version bumps were necessary to complete the required template section.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change—fixing a variable name typo from 'recipientNmae' to 'recipientName' in the e_conomic action.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2583778 and 6356bba.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/e_conomic/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/e_conomic/package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: jcortes
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 14467
File: components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs:4-6
Timestamp: 2024-10-30T15:24:39.294Z
Learning: In `components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs`, the action name should be "Create Account" instead of "Create Memory".
📚 Learning: 2024-10-30T15:24:39.294Z
Learnt from: jcortes
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 14467
File: components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs:4-6
Timestamp: 2024-10-30T15:24:39.294Z
Learning: In `components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs`, the action name should be "Create Account" instead of "Create Memory".

Applied to files:

  • components/e_conomic/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/e_conomic/package.json (1)

3-3: Component version bump is appropriate

Version 0.1.1 cleanly reflects the public API change in the action; this is consistent with the action version bump.

components/e_conomic/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs (2)

7-7: Action version bump correctly reflects API change

Updating the action version to 0.0.2 is appropriate for the prop rename, so older workflows can remain pinned to the previous version if needed.


45-49: Prop rename fixes runtime bug; verify no remaining uses of recipientNmae

Renaming the prop to recipientName now aligns with its usage in run() (Line 107) and should fix the issue where the recipient name was effectively undefined.

To confirm there are no lingering references to the old misspelling, run a search for recipientNmae in the codebase.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for fixing this!

@michelle0927 michelle0927 moved this from Ready for PR Review to Ready for QA in Component (Source and Action) Backlog Dec 2, 2025
@vunguyenhung vunguyenhung moved this from Ready for QA to Ready for Release in Component (Source and Action) Backlog Dec 3, 2025
@vunguyenhung
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi everyone, all test cases are passed! Ready for release!

Test reports

@michelle0927 michelle0927 merged commit 4037eb4 into PipedreamHQ:master Dec 3, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Ready for Release to Done in Component (Source and Action) Backlog Dec 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants