Skip to content

Conversation

@lcaresia
Copy link
Collaborator

@lcaresia lcaresia commented Nov 25, 2025

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Create and manage video configurations with customizable content types, styles, voices, language, and max duration.
    • Generate videos from saved configurations, starting background generation tasks.
    • Monitor video generation progress and retrieve task status/results.
    • New preset option lists for content types, styles, and voices to simplify selections.
  • Enhancements
    • Broader Robopost integration for a smoother video-generation workflow.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@lcaresia lcaresia self-assigned this Nov 25, 2025
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 25, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs Ignored Ignored Nov 26, 2025 0:01am
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit Ignored Ignored Nov 26, 2025 0:01am

@lcaresia lcaresia linked an issue Nov 25, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

Adds three Robopost action modules for video workflows, a constants module, and extensive app enhancements (API client, new methods, propDefinitions). Bumps package version and adds a platform dependency.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Action modules
components/robopost/actions/create-video-configuration/create-video-configuration.mjs, components/robopost/actions/generate-video/generate-video.mjs, components/robopost/actions/get-video-status/get-video-status.mjs
New action modules exporting default action objects with metadata, props tied to the app, and run() methods that call corresponding app methods and return API responses with exported summaries.
App implementation
components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs
Added API client internals (_baseUrl, _makeRequest), new public methods (createVideoConfiguration, generateVideo, getVideoStatus, getVideoSeries, getTaskStatus), and expanded propDefinitions (name, contentType, style, voice, lang, maxDuration, configurationId, taskId) including async option loaders.
Constants
components/robopost/common/constants.mjs
New default export containing arrays: CONTENT_TYPES, STYLE_OPTIONS, and VOICE_OPTIONS.
Package metadata
components/robopost/package.json
Version bumped from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 and dependencies added with "@pipedream/platform": "^3.1.1".

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Action as Action Module
    participant App as robopost.app
    participant API as Robopost API

    User->>Action: Invoke action (create/generate/get-status)
    Action->>App: this.app.<method>(payload, $)
    App->>App: _makeRequest() (inject API key)
    App->>API: HTTP request (POST/GET) with payload
    API-->>App: Response (configuration / task / status)
    App-->>Action: Return response
    Action-->>User: Export summary and response
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes

  • Review components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs for API request correctness, auth injection, error handling, and async option builders.
  • Verify action modules map inputs to API payloads and handle responses (IDs/status) as expected.
  • Confirm constant lists in common/constants.mjs align with propDefinitions.
  • Check package.json dependency addition and version bump.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The pull request description is incomplete, containing only a placeholder 'WHY' section with an unfilled comment. Complete the description by explaining the rationale for these changes, what problems they solve, and any relevant implementation details.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title is vague and references only an issue number without describing the actual changes made in the pull request. Revise the title to clearly describe the main changes, e.g., 'Add Robopost video generation actions and configuration' or similar descriptive phrasing.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6845b85 and 486b78c.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • components/robopost/actions/create-video-configuration/create-video-configuration.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/robopost/actions/generate-video/generate-video.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/robopost/actions/get-video-status/get-video-status.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/robopost/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/robopost/package.json (2 hunks)
  • components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2024-12-12T19:23:09.039Z
Learnt from: jcortes
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 14935
File: components/sailpoint/package.json:15-18
Timestamp: 2024-12-12T19:23:09.039Z
Learning: When developing Pipedream components, do not add built-in Node.js modules like `fs` to `package.json` dependencies, as they are native modules provided by the Node.js runtime.

Applied to files:

  • components/robopost/package.json
🧬 Code graph analysis (4)
components/robopost/actions/create-video-configuration/create-video-configuration.mjs (3)
components/robopost/actions/generate-video/generate-video.mjs (1)
  • response (24-27)
components/robopost/actions/get-video-status/get-video-status.mjs (1)
  • response (24-27)
components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs (2)
  • response (51-51)
  • response (65-65)
components/robopost/actions/get-video-status/get-video-status.mjs (3)
components/robopost/actions/create-video-configuration/create-video-configuration.mjs (1)
  • response (54-64)
components/robopost/actions/generate-video/generate-video.mjs (1)
  • response (24-27)
components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs (2)
  • response (51-51)
  • response (65-65)
components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs (3)
components/robopost/actions/create-video-configuration/create-video-configuration.mjs (1)
  • response (54-64)
components/robopost/actions/generate-video/generate-video.mjs (1)
  • response (24-27)
components/robopost/actions/get-video-status/get-video-status.mjs (1)
  • response (24-27)
components/robopost/actions/generate-video/generate-video.mjs (2)
components/robopost/actions/create-video-configuration/create-video-configuration.mjs (1)
  • response (54-64)
components/robopost/actions/get-video-status/get-video-status.mjs (1)
  • response (24-27)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Components Checks
components/robopost/package.json

[error] 1-1: pnpm install -r failed with exit code 1 due to frozen-lockfile: lockfile is not up to date with package.json. Specifiers in the lockfile do not match package.json: {"@pipedream/platform":"^3.1.1"}. Run 'pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile' or update the lockfile.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
components/robopost/package.json

[error] 1-1: Dependency specifier mismatch detected for '@pipedream/platform': expected '^3.1.1' in package.json does not align with lockfile. Run 'pnpm install' to update the lockfile.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/robopost/common/constants.mjs (1)

1-50: LGTM!

Clean extraction of configuration options into a centralized constants module. This promotes maintainability and consistency across the Robopost components.

components/robopost/actions/create-video-configuration/create-video-configuration.mjs (1)

53-67: LGTM with a minor suggestion.

The action correctly maps properties to snake_case API fields and follows the established Pipedream action pattern. Consider adding a fallback for response.id in the summary to handle unexpected API responses gracefully.

-    $.export("$summary", `Successfully created video series configuration with ID: ${response.id}`);
+    $.export("$summary", `Successfully created video series configuration with ID: ${response.id ?? "unknown"}`);
components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs (2)

1-2: LGTM on the API client implementation.

The internal request handler and API methods are well-structured with consistent patterns. Good use of the spread operator to allow flexible argument passing while maintaining required parameters.

Also applies to: 76-130


86-93: No issues found—API key placement is correct per Robopost API design.

Robopost's API documentation specifies that the API key should be included as a query parameter named apikey, which matches the implementation in the code. The concern about query parameters appearing in logs is noted but is not applicable here, as this is the documented and required authentication method for this API.

components/robopost/actions/generate-video/generate-video.mjs (3)

3-13: Action metadata is coherent and appropriate for this operation

Key, name, description, annotations, and type: "action" accurately represent a non-destructive video generation task action. No changes needed here.


14-22: Props wiring correctly reuses shared configurationId definition

Using propDefinition: [app, "configurationId"] keeps this action aligned with the centralized Robopost configuration prop, which is good for consistency and reuse.


23-30: Confirm API response field task_id used in summary

The run implementation is straightforward and consistent with other actions. One thing to double-check: that this.app.generateVideo always returns a task_id field on response. If the API ever returns a different shape (e.g. taskId or nested under another key), the summary would show undefined.

Please confirm the response schema from robopost.app.mjs / the Robopost API and adjust the summary field access if needed.

Comment on lines +23 to +29
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.getVideoStatus({
$,
taskId: this.taskId,
});
$.export("$summary", `The task status is: ${response.status}`);
return response;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Consider guarding against undefined status in the summary.

If the API response doesn't include a status field, the summary will display "undefined". Consider adding a fallback.

-    $.export("$summary", `The task status is: ${response.status}`);
+    $.export("$summary", `The task status is: ${response.status ?? "unknown"}`);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.getVideoStatus({
$,
taskId: this.taskId,
});
$.export("$summary", `The task status is: ${response.status}`);
return response;
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.getVideoStatus({
$,
taskId: this.taskId,
});
$.export("$summary", `The task status is: ${response.status ?? "unknown"}`);
return response;
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/robopost/actions/get-video-status/get-video-status.mjs around
lines 23 to 29, the summary exports response.status directly which can become
"undefined" if the API omits status; update the logic to guard for a missing
response or missing status and use a fallback (e.g., 'unknown' or 'N/A') when
status is falsy or undefined, and ensure you handle a null/undefined response
before accessing .status so the summary always exports a defined string.

Comment on lines +50 to +58
async options() {
const response = await this.getVideoSeries();
return response.map(({
name, id,
}) => ({
label: name,
value: id,
}));
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Add defensive handling for API responses in options().

If getVideoSeries() returns an error or unexpected structure, .map() will throw. Consider wrapping with a try-catch or validating the response type.

     async options() {
-      const response = await this.getVideoSeries();
-      return response.map(({
-        name, id,
-      }) => ({
-        label: name,
-        value: id,
-      }));
+      const response = await this.getVideoSeries();
+      return (response ?? []).map(({
+        name, id,
+      }) => ({
+        label: name,
+        value: id,
+      }));
     },
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs around lines 50 to 58, the options()
method assumes getVideoSeries() returns an array and calls .map() directly,
which will throw if the response is an error, null, or not an array. Update
options() to validate and normalize the API response before mapping: await
getVideoSeries() inside a try-catch, verify Array.isArray(response) (or coerce
to [] if falsy), and handle errors by logging/returning an empty array or a safe
default; ensure the map only runs on a confirmed array and that thrown errors
are caught and propagated or converted to a user-friendly error.

Comment on lines +64 to +72
async options() {
const response = await this.getTaskStatus();
return response.map(({
created_at, task_id,
}) => ({
label: created_at,
value: task_id,
}));
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Same defensive handling needed for taskId options().

Apply similar null-coalescing to prevent runtime errors if getTaskStatus() returns an unexpected value.

     async options() {
-      const response = await this.getTaskStatus();
-      return response.map(({
+      const response = await this.getTaskStatus();
+      return (response ?? []).map(({
         created_at, task_id,
       }) => ({
         label: created_at,
         value: task_id,
       }));
     },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async options() {
const response = await this.getTaskStatus();
return response.map(({
created_at, task_id,
}) => ({
label: created_at,
value: task_id,
}));
},
async options() {
const response = await this.getTaskStatus();
return (response ?? []).map(({
created_at, task_id,
}) => ({
label: created_at,
value: task_id,
}));
},
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs around lines 64 to 72, options() assumes
getTaskStatus() returns an array and directly calls map, which can throw if the
response is null/undefined or contains null entries; change the code to default
response to an empty array (e.g., response ?? []) before mapping and defensively
handle each item (guard created_at and task_id) so options always returns a safe
array of {label,value} without throwing.

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Although it seems pnpm install -r needs to be run as the lockfile is not updated in the PR

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs (2)

52-60: Add defensive handling for API responses in options().

The options() method assumes getVideoSeries() returns an array and calls .map() directly, which will throw a TypeError if the response is null, undefined, or not an array.

Apply this diff to add defensive handling:

     async options() {
       const response = await this.getVideoSeries();
-      return response.map(({
+      return (response ?? []).map(({
         name, id,
       }) => ({
         label: name,
         value: id,
       }));
     },

66-74: Add defensive handling for API responses in options().

The options() method assumes getTaskStatus() returns an array and calls .map() directly, which will throw a TypeError if the response is null, undefined, or not an array.

Apply this diff to add defensive handling:

     async options() {
       const response = await this.getTaskStatus();
-      return response.map(({
+      return (response ?? []).map(({
         created_at, task_id,
       }) => ({
         label: created_at,
         value: task_id,
       }));
     },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 486b78c and 2846554.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-06-04T17:52:05.780Z
Learnt from: GTFalcao
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 16954
File: components/salesloft/salesloft.app.mjs:14-23
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T17:52:05.780Z
Learning: In the Salesloft API integration (components/salesloft/salesloft.app.mjs), the _makeRequest method returns response.data which directly contains arrays for list endpoints like listPeople, listCadences, listUsers, and listAccounts. The propDefinitions correctly call .map() directly on these responses without needing to destructure a nested data property.

Applied to files:

  • components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs
📚 Learning: 2025-09-12T07:49:36.125Z
Learnt from: matyascimbulka
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 18308
File: components/apify/actions/run-task-synchronously/run-task-synchronously.mjs:70-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-12T07:49:36.125Z
Learning: The Apify Task object always contains the `options` field according to the official API documentation, making nested destructuring like `options: { build }` safe to use without additional checks.

Applied to files:

  • components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs (1)

88-95: No issues found — API key placement is correct.

Robopost's REST docs require the API key to be sent as a query parameter (?apikey=YOUR_API_KEY), not via an Authorization header. The current implementation at lines 88-95 correctly passes the API key in the params object, which aligns with the API specification.

...otherOpts,
url: this._baseUrl() + path,
params: {
apikey: `${this.$auth.api_key}`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Remove unnecessary string interpolation.

The template literal is redundant since this.$auth.api_key is already a string.

Apply this diff:

       params: {
-        apikey: `${this.$auth.api_key}`,
+        apikey: this.$auth.api_key,
         ...params,
       },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
apikey: `${this.$auth.api_key}`,
params: {
apikey: this.$auth.api_key,
...params,
},
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs around line 92, the apikey value uses an
unnecessary template literal (`\`${this.$auth.api_key}\``); replace it with the
direct string property access `this.$auth.api_key` (remove the backticks and
${...}) so the code assigns the API key directly without interpolation.

Comment on lines +104 to +112
async generateVideo({
configurationId, ...args
}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/video-tasks/${configurationId}/generate`,
method: "post",
...args,
});
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Consider validating required parameters.

The method destructures configurationId but doesn't validate it's provided. If undefined, this constructs an invalid URL (/video-tasks/undefined/generate), resulting in unclear API errors.

Adding validation would improve error messages:

 async generateVideo({
   configurationId, ...args
 }) {
+  if (!configurationId) {
+    throw new Error("configurationId is required");
+  }
   return this._makeRequest({
     path: `/video-tasks/${configurationId}/generate`,
     method: "post",
     ...args,
   });
 },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async generateVideo({
configurationId, ...args
}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/video-tasks/${configurationId}/generate`,
method: "post",
...args,
});
},
async generateVideo({
configurationId, ...args
}) {
if (!configurationId) {
throw new Error("configurationId is required");
}
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/video-tasks/${configurationId}/generate`,
method: "post",
...args,
});
},
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs around lines 104 to 112, the
generateVideo method destructures configurationId but does not validate it,
which can produce a bad URL like /video-tasks/undefined/generate; add an early
validation that ensures configurationId is present (and optionally of expected
type, e.g., string or number), and if not, throw a clear Error (or return a
rejected Promise) with a descriptive message like "generateVideo:
configurationId is required"; keep the rest of the method unchanged so valid
calls proceed to this._makeRequest.

Comment on lines +113 to +120
async getVideoStatus({
taskId, ...args
}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/video-tasks/${taskId}`,
...args,
});
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Consider validating required parameters.

The method destructures taskId but doesn't validate it's provided. If undefined, this constructs an invalid URL (/video-tasks/undefined), resulting in unclear API errors.

Adding validation would improve error messages:

 async getVideoStatus({
   taskId, ...args
 }) {
+  if (!taskId) {
+    throw new Error("taskId is required");
+  }
   return this._makeRequest({
     path: `/video-tasks/${taskId}`,
     ...args,
   });
 },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async getVideoStatus({
taskId, ...args
}) {
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/video-tasks/${taskId}`,
...args,
});
},
async getVideoStatus({
taskId, ...args
}) {
if (!taskId) {
throw new Error("taskId is required");
}
return this._makeRequest({
path: `/video-tasks/${taskId}`,
...args,
});
},
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/robopost/robopost.app.mjs around lines 113 to 120, the
getVideoStatus method destructures taskId but does not validate it, which can
produce requests to /video-tasks/undefined; add an early validation that ensures
taskId is present and a non-empty string (or valid id type) and if not, throw a
clear Error/TypeError (or return a rejected Promise) with a descriptive message
like "getVideoStatus requires a valid taskId" before calling _makeRequest; this
prevents constructing invalid URLs and gives immediate, actionable errors to
callers.

@vunguyenhung
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi everyone, all test cases are passed! Ready for release!

Test reports

@lcaresia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

@GTFalcao GTFalcao merged commit 10ad254 into master Nov 26, 2025
10 checks passed
@GTFalcao GTFalcao deleted the issue-17638 branch November 26, 2025 16:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] Robopost

4 participants