Skip to content

Conversation

@ThomasNaderBMW
Copy link
Contributor

@ThomasNaderBMW ThomasNaderBMW commented Jun 30, 2021

Reference to a related issue in the repository

Solves #481 and is the continuation of #441, which broke down after a rebase (I am sorry for that).

Add a description

Host vehicle data is about the perception of the vehicle about it's own, internal states.
It can be understood as an interface container for restbussimulation signals.
If there is a duplication with values from the rest of SensorView or SensorData, than these shall be taken.

It consists of different messages categorizing the vehicle in:
Vehicle-Basics, Vehicle-Powertrain, Vehicle-SteeringWheel, Vehicle-Wheels, Vehicle-Localization.

Some questions to ask:
Does it break any existing functionality or force me to update to a new version?
No, but some fields are deprecated (toDo for 4.0).

Take this checklist as orientation for yourself, if this PR is ready for the Change Control Board:

  • My suggestion follows the style and contributors guidelines.
  • I have taken care about the documentation.
  • I have done the DCO signoff.
  • My changes generate no errors when passing CI tests.
  • I have successfully implemented and tested my fix/feature locally.
  • Appropriate reviewer(s) are assigned.

If you can’t check all of them, please explain why.
If all boxes are checked or commented and you have achieved at least one positive review, you can assign the label ReadyForCCBReview!

@ThomasNaderBMW ThomasNaderBMW self-assigned this Jun 30, 2021
@ThomasNaderBMW ThomasNaderBMW added the TrafficParticipants The group in the ASAM development project working on traffic participants. label Jun 30, 2021
@ThomasNaderBMW ThomasNaderBMW added this to the V3.4.0 milestone Jun 30, 2021
@0815-code 0815-code requested a review from a user July 1, 2021 19:25
@ThomasNaderBMW ThomasNaderBMW added the ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this PR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. label Jul 7, 2021
@stefancyliax
Copy link
Contributor

CCB 13.07.2021:
Due to missing participation, PR has to be shifted to next CCB.

@kmeids
Copy link

kmeids commented Jul 21, 2021

CCB Output 21.07.2021

  1. For geodetic reference please check https://opensimulationinterface.github.io/open-simulation-interface/structosi3_1_1GroundTruth.html#af5f78f308a00d74ece79410eb7913006
  2. VehiclePositionAndKinematics message to be revisited within the TrafficParticipants WG.

@kmeids kmeids removed the ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this PR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. label Jul 21, 2021
@stefancyliax
Copy link
Contributor

CCB Meeting 04.08.2021:

  • @ThomasNaderBMW Please update PR or remove milestone. We have to move things forward.

@ThomasNaderBMW ThomasNaderBMW added the ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this PR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. label Aug 23, 2021
@ThomasNaderBMW
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stefancyliax : Can we give it 10 min in the next CCB?
@kmeids and @pmai : Is it okay like this? I would like to use the chance and bring it into 3.4.

@stefancyliax
Copy link
Contributor

stefancyliax commented Aug 25, 2021

OSI CCB:

@ThomasNaderBMW ThomasNaderBMW force-pushed the Extension_osi_hostvehicledata_v2 branch from 081c58a to 3c7304e Compare September 13, 2021 18:04
@kmeids kmeids added Documentation Everything which impacts the quality of the documentation and guidelines. and removed ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this PR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. labels Sep 15, 2021
osi_common.proto Outdated
}

//
// \brief The geodetic position of an object, i.e. center of the bounding box.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// \brief The geodetic position of an object, i.e. center of the bounding box.
// \brief The geodetic position of an object, i.e. center of the 3D bounding box.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done.

@kmeids
Copy link

kmeids commented Sep 15, 2021

Output CCB 15.09.2021:

  1. @pasched could you please do a documentation review for the .proto files and set the tag "ReadyToMerge" (please check https://github.com/OpenSimulationInterface/open-simulation-interface/pull/547/files#r709021632)?
  2. @pmai to merge after documentation review.

@FKlopfer FKlopfer force-pushed the Extension_osi_hostvehicledata_v2 branch from ab296c8 to bc7e61e Compare September 17, 2021 09:30
@ThomasNaderBMW
Copy link
Contributor Author

@FKlopfer : Is it ready to merge? Your change removed the DCO Sign off, do you add it or is an action from my side required?

@FKlopfer
Copy link
Contributor

@FKlopfer : Is it ready to merge? Your change removed the DCO Sign off, do you add it or is an action from my side required?

Hi @ThomasNaderBMW , it is ready to merge from my side. There was something wrong in the GitHub configuration regarding the DCO last Friday that @stefancyliax was trying to fix but I do not know how far ge got.

@kmeids kmeids added the ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this PR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. label Oct 1, 2021
@ThomasNaderBMW ThomasNaderBMW force-pushed the Extension_osi_hostvehicledata_v2 branch from 0c084d1 to e973b6f Compare October 11, 2021 11:50
@ThomasNaderBMW ThomasNaderBMW added ReadyToMerge This PR has been approved to merge and will be merged by a member of the CCB. and removed Documentation Everything which impacts the quality of the documentation and guidelines. ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this PR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. labels Oct 11, 2021
//
// \brief The focus here is on the description of a wheel.
//
message WheelData
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CCB Output 13.10.2021:

  1. @pmai Please update the comment to indicate that this only relevant to the internal wheel data of the vehicle.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I already did the description improvements.

@ThomasNaderBMW
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you check and merge @pmai ?

@pmai pmai force-pushed the Extension_osi_hostvehicledata_v2 branch from a5e2e77 to 2795866 Compare October 19, 2021 10:07
ThomasNaderBMW and others added 8 commits October 19, 2021 12:10
…the hostVehicleData #441" (before it broke down).

Signed-off-by: Nader Thomas <thomas.nader@bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: Nader Thomas <thomas.nader@bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: spider <Thomas.Nader@bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Nader <Thomas.Nader@bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: spider <Thomas.Nader@bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Nader <Thomas.Nader@bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: Pierre R. Mai <pmai@pmsf.de>
Changes done to be open for SetLevel4to5 Requirements.

Signed-off-by: spider <Thomas.Nader@bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Nader <Thomas.Nader@bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: Pierre R. Mai <pmai@pmsf.de>
@pmai pmai force-pushed the Extension_osi_hostvehicledata_v2 branch from 2795866 to 41946d4 Compare October 19, 2021 10:13
@pmai pmai merged commit f5e6992 into master Oct 19, 2021
@stefancyliax stefancyliax deleted the Extension_osi_hostvehicledata_v2 branch October 21, 2021 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ReadyToMerge This PR has been approved to merge and will be merged by a member of the CCB. TrafficParticipants The group in the ASAM development project working on traffic participants.

Projects

None yet

8 participants