Skip to content

Conversation

@spencer-lunarg
Copy link
Contributor

Some more things I realized that I felt should be here

Copy link
Collaborator

@SaschaWillems SaschaWillems left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great addition. That's some helpful insight :)

Copy link
Contributor

@gpx1000 gpx1000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's pretty good addition. I never actually realized that but it makes sense that this is the way the descriptor buffers work. I do worry that there should be an explicit "must" somewhere in the spec that the memory is contiguous etc before recommending someone directly memcpy to it. There's also likelihood for security implications somewhere in there as well; but I don't know what those security implications would expose etc.
Anyway, Great information! Definitely worth merging!

@spencer-lunarg spencer-lunarg merged commit 47a2259 into KhronosGroup:main Oct 11, 2025
1 check passed
@spencer-lunarg spencer-lunarg deleted the spencer-lunarg-descriptor-buffer-more branch October 11, 2025 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants