Skip to content

Conversation

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 15, 2020

Added readme.python.md for multi API support (#12540)

* Added readme.python.md for multi API support
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR servicebus] Servicebus : Added APIs to 2018-01-01-preview API version [ReleasePR servicebus] Added readme.python.md for multi API support Jan 21, 2021
@azcloudfarmer azcloudfarmer reopened this Jan 28, 2021
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR has been auto-approved by the @msftbot for the azure-resource-manager-schemas repo.

@ghost ghost added the automerge label Jan 28, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 28, 2021

Hello @msftbot[bot]!

Because this pull request has the automerge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.

p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 28, 2021

Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, I've been configured to only merge when all checks have explicitly passed. The following integrations have not reported any progress on their checks and are blocking auto-merge:

  1. GitHub Actions

These integrations are possibly never going to report a check, and unblocking auto-merge likely requires a human being to update my configuration to exempt these integrations from requiring a passing check.

Give feedback on this
From the bot dev team

We've tried to tune the bot such that it posts a comment like this only when auto-merge is blocked for exceptional, non-intuitive reasons. When the bot's auto-merge capability is properly configured, auto-merge should operate as you would intuitively expect and you should not see any spurious comments.

Please reach out to us at fabricbotservices@microsoft.com to provide feedback if you believe you're seeing this comment appear spuriously. Please note that we usually are unable to update your bot configuration on your team's behalf, but we're happy to help you identify your bot admin.

@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR servicebus] Added readme.python.md for multi API support [ReleasePR servicebus] 2021 preview sb Mar 16, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR servicebus] 2021 preview sb [ReleasePR servicebus] service bug, remove externalDocs with empty url Mar 25, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR servicebus] service bug, remove externalDocs with empty url [ReleasePR servicebus] Update all schemas.md files Apr 9, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR servicebus] Update all schemas.md files [ReleasePR servicebus] Changes to Fix Swagger Correctness May 25, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR servicebus] Changes to Fix Swagger Correctness [ReleasePR servicebus] Servicebus t1 del Jun 18, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR servicebus] Servicebus t1 del [ReleasePR servicebus] New api version support to include disable local auth for service bus Jul 7, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR servicebus] New api version support to include disable local auth for service bus [ReleasePR servicebus] add track2 servicebus readme.go.md Jul 21, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR servicebus] add track2 servicebus readme.go.md [ReleasePR servicebus] add apitestErrorCode doc Aug 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant