-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Description
https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/NOTE-selectors-states-20170223/#frags says:
Note that this representation is valid only if the IRI for the Source does not contain a fragment identifier of its own (an IRI may contain at most one fragment identification).
https://github.com/bokand/ScrollToTextFragment/issues/4#issuecomment-464036000
Is there a way to handle multiple attributes in the fragment e.g. so that
SPAs can just drop the e.g.&selector=...attribute when doing client side
routing?Maybe something like:
#!route/two&selector=(...)
#!route/two#selector=(...)
#!route/two;;selector=(...)
... from https://github.com/bokand/ScrollToTextFragment/issues/4#issuecomment-464485999 .
Can we make selector(...) a value of a keyed attribute?
Other than https://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/selector-note/converter/ , which tools support this note?
The values should be percent encoded [rfc3986]; the encoding is a must for characters that may make the fragment ambiguous, namely: [ =,#]
Applying percent encoding method for entire IRI string might also cause unnecessary troubles.
With #!route/two#selector=(...), AFAIU a URL parsing library should return the part after the first # (regardless of percent encoding). This form would be easiest for client side SPA URI routing because the (nonconforming?) app could just drop the data after the second # (which should technically be percent-encoded AFAIU)