-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 978
docs: replace manual for loop in examples
#6490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Coverage Report
The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR. |
|
@hrshya Would you mind resolving the CI failures? |
|
In particular, the examples failures. The test failures stem from tooling limitations, it seems. |
Signed-off-by: Harsh <149176984+hrshya@users.noreply.github.com>
Planeshifter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Will try to get the test CI workflow to not fail properly handle case where lots of downstream packages have to be tested soon...
PR Commit MessagePlease review the above commit message and make any necessary adjustments. |
Resolves none .
Description
This pull request:
math/base/special/polygamma,math/base/special/pow,math/base/special/powm1,math/base/special/rad2deg,math/base/special/rad2degfandmath/base/special/rcbrtpackages.Related Issues
This pull request:
Questions
No.
Other
No.
Checklist
@stdlib-js/reviewers