@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ use syntax::ext::base::{ExtCtxt, SyntaxEnv, Annotatable};
1616use syntax:: ext:: base:: { MultiDecorator , MultiItemDecorator , MultiModifier } ;
1717use syntax:: ext:: build:: AstBuilder ;
1818use syntax:: feature_gate;
19- use syntax:: codemap:: Span ;
19+ use syntax:: codemap:: { self , Span } ;
2020use syntax:: parse:: token:: { intern, intern_and_get_ident} ;
2121use syntax:: ptr:: P ;
2222
@@ -96,36 +96,6 @@ fn expand_derive(cx: &mut ExtCtxt,
9696 let mut found_partial_eq = false ;
9797 let mut found_eq = false ;
9898
99- // This span is **very** sensitive and crucial to
100- // getting the stability behavior we want. What we are
101- // doing is marking the generated `#[derive_*]` with the
102- // span of the `#[deriving(...)]` attribute (the
103- // entire attribute, not just the `PartialEq` or `Eq`
104- // part), but with the current backtrace. The current
105- // backtrace will contain a topmost entry that IS this
106- // `#[deriving(...)]` attribute and with the
107- // "allow-unstable" flag set to true.
108- //
109- // Note that we do NOT use the span of the `Eq`
110- // text itself. You might think this is
111- // equivalent, because the `Eq` appears within the
112- // `#[deriving(Eq)]` attribute, and hence we would
113- // inherit the "allows unstable" from the
114- // backtrace. But in fact this is not always the
115- // case. The actual source text that led to
116- // deriving can be `#[$attr]`, for example, where
117- // `$attr == deriving(Eq)`. In that case, the
118- // "#[derive_*]" would be considered to
119- // originate not from the deriving call but from
120- // text outside the deriving call, and hence would
121- // be forbidden from using unstable
122- // content.
123- //
124- // See tests src/run-pass/rfc1445 for
125- // examples. --nmatsakis
126- let span = Span { expn_id : cx. backtrace ( ) , .. span } ;
127- assert ! ( cx. parse_sess. codemap( ) . span_allows_unstable( span) ) ;
128-
12999 for titem in traits. iter ( ) . rev ( ) {
130100 let tname = match titem. node {
131101 MetaItemKind :: Word ( ref tname) => tname,
@@ -150,6 +120,17 @@ fn expand_derive(cx: &mut ExtCtxt,
150120 found_partial_eq = true ;
151121 }
152122
123+ let span = Span {
124+ expn_id : cx. codemap ( ) . record_expansion ( codemap:: ExpnInfo {
125+ call_site : titem. span ,
126+ callee : codemap:: NameAndSpan {
127+ format : codemap:: MacroAttribute ( intern ( & format ! ( "derive({})" , tname) ) ) ,
128+ span : Some ( titem. span ) ,
129+ allow_internal_unstable : true ,
130+ } ,
131+ } ) , ..titem. span
132+ } ;
133+
153134 // #[derive(Foo, Bar)] expands to #[derive_Foo] #[derive_Bar]
154135 item. attrs . push ( cx. attribute ( span, cx. meta_word ( titem. span ,
155136 intern_and_get_ident ( & format ! ( "derive_{}" , tname) ) ) ) ) ;
@@ -158,6 +139,35 @@ fn expand_derive(cx: &mut ExtCtxt,
158139 // RFC #1445. `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]` adds a (trusted)
159140 // `#[structural_match]` attribute.
160141 if found_partial_eq && found_eq {
142+ // This span is **very** sensitive and crucial to
143+ // getting the stability behavior we want. What we are
144+ // doing is marking `#[structural_match]` with the
145+ // span of the `#[deriving(...)]` attribute (the
146+ // entire attribute, not just the `PartialEq` or `Eq`
147+ // part), but with the current backtrace. The current
148+ // backtrace will contain a topmost entry that IS this
149+ // `#[deriving(...)]` attribute and with the
150+ // "allow-unstable" flag set to true.
151+ //
152+ // Note that we do NOT use the span of the `Eq`
153+ // text itself. You might think this is
154+ // equivalent, because the `Eq` appears within the
155+ // `#[deriving(Eq)]` attribute, and hence we would
156+ // inherit the "allows unstable" from the
157+ // backtrace. But in fact this is not always the
158+ // case. The actual source text that led to
159+ // deriving can be `#[$attr]`, for example, where
160+ // `$attr == deriving(Eq)`. In that case, the
161+ // "#[structural_match]" would be considered to
162+ // originate not from the deriving call but from
163+ // text outside the deriving call, and hence would
164+ // be forbidden from using unstable
165+ // content.
166+ //
167+ // See tests src/run-pass/rfc1445 for
168+ // examples. --nmatsakis
169+ let span = Span { expn_id : cx. backtrace ( ) , .. span } ;
170+ assert ! ( cx. parse_sess. codemap( ) . span_allows_unstable( span) ) ;
161171 debug ! ( "inserting structural_match with span {:?}" , span) ;
162172 let structural_match = intern_and_get_ident ( "structural_match" ) ;
163173 item. attrs . push ( cx. attribute ( span,
0 commit comments