From 9b69a21f4dd3d52b43bf0a06ba660d97414079b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Danny Stoll <64173476+DannyStoll1@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 16:28:15 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Fix comment to reflect isfile behavior with symlinks

Previous comment was confusing, referencing isdir instead of isfile.
---
 Lib/genericpath.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Lib/genericpath.py b/Lib/genericpath.py
index 7588fe5e8020f9..28985565781ef0 100644
--- a/Lib/genericpath.py
+++ b/Lib/genericpath.py
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ def lexists(path):
         return False
     return True
 
-# This follows symbolic links, so both islink() and isdir() can be true
+# This follows symbolic links, so both islink() and isfile() can be true
 # for the same path on systems that support symlinks
 def isfile(path):
     """Test whether a path is a regular file"""