|
| 1 | +# ElixirScope Foundation Infrastructure - Missing Features TODO |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Overview |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +This document details the **missing 15%** of infrastructure features identified in the ElixirScope Foundation implementation analysis. While the core infrastructure is 85% complete with all critical protection patterns implemented, several advanced monitoring and AOP features remain unimplemented. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +**Current Implementation Status: 85% Complete** |
| 8 | +- ✅ Core Protection Patterns (Circuit Breaker, Rate Limiter, Connection Pooling) |
| 9 | +- ✅ Unified Infrastructure Facade |
| 10 | +- ✅ Superior Registry Architecture |
| 11 | +- ✅ Full Foundation Integration |
| 12 | +- ❌ Custom Monitoring Services (Missing 15%) |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +--- |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## 1. Custom Infrastructure Services - NOT IMPLEMENTED (0%) |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +### 1.1 PerformanceMonitor Service ❌ |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +**Status**: Design exists in docs but not implemented in actual codebase |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +**Documentation References**: |
| 23 | +- `docs/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW/infrastructure/performance_monitor.ex` (complete design) |
| 24 | +- `docs/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW/10_gemini_plan.md` (architectural overview) |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +**Detailed Design Found**: |
| 27 | +```elixir |
| 28 | +# Full GenServer implementation design exists with: |
| 29 | +- Module: ElixirScope.Foundation.Infrastructure.PerformanceMonitor |
| 30 | +- Metric Types: :latency, :throughput, :error_rate, :resource_usage |
| 31 | +- API Methods: record_latency/4, record_throughput/4, record_error_rate/4 |
| 32 | +- Performance Analysis: get_performance_summary/3, get_baseline/2 |
| 33 | +- Alerting: set_alert_threshold/4, check_performance_health/2 |
| 34 | +- Time Windows: :minute, :hour, :day with aggregations (:avg, :p50, :p95, :p99) |
| 35 | +``` |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +**Missing Implementation Features**: |
| 38 | +- GenServer for metric collection and aggregation |
| 39 | +- Baseline performance calculation algorithms |
| 40 | +- Performance alerting system with threshold monitoring |
| 41 | +- Integration with telemetry events from other infrastructure components |
| 42 | +- Retention and cleanup of historical performance data |
| 43 | +- REST/HTTP endpoint exposure for metrics |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +**Integration Points** (from docs): |
| 46 | +- Circuit Breakers, Rate Limiters, Connection Pools send metrics |
| 47 | +- Infrastructure facade calls `record_operation_success/failure` |
| 48 | +- Example usage: `PerformanceMonitor.record_latency(namespace, [:foundation, :config, :get], 1500, %{cache: :miss})` |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +### 1.2 MemoryManager Service ❌ |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +**Status**: Design exists in docs but not implemented in actual codebase |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +**Documentation References**: |
| 55 | +- `docs/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW/infrastructure/memory_manager.ex` (complete design) |
| 56 | +- `docs/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW/infrastructure.ex` (integration examples) |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +**Detailed Design Found**: |
| 59 | +```elixir |
| 60 | +# Full GenServer implementation design exists with: |
| 61 | +- Module: ElixirScope.Foundation.Infrastructure.MemoryManager |
| 62 | +- Pressure Levels: :low, :medium, :high, :critical |
| 63 | +- API Methods: check_pressure/1, request_cleanup/3, get_stats/1 |
| 64 | +- Memory Stats: total_memory, process_memory, system_memory, threshold_percentage |
| 65 | +- Cleanup Strategies: Configurable cleanup modules implementing MemoryCleanup behaviour |
| 66 | +``` |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +**Missing Implementation Features**: |
| 69 | +- GenServer for continuous memory monitoring |
| 70 | +- Pressure level detection algorithms based on configurable thresholds |
| 71 | +- Cleanup strategy framework with behaviour definition |
| 72 | +- Integration with Infrastructure facade for memory pressure checks |
| 73 | +- Automatic cleanup triggering when pressure levels exceed thresholds |
| 74 | +- Memory usage tracking and historical analysis |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +**Integration Points** (from docs): |
| 77 | +- Infrastructure facade checks memory pressure before operations |
| 78 | +- Example: `check_memory_pressure(namespace)` returns `:critical` → `:error, :memory_pressure_critical` |
| 79 | +- Cleanup strategies for: EventStore, ConfigCache, TelemetryService |
| 80 | +- Configurable cleanup with priority levels |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +### 1.3 HealthAggregator Service ❌ |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +**Status**: Partial design exists in docs but not implemented in actual codebase |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +**Documentation References**: |
| 87 | +- `docs/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW/infrastructure/health_check.ex` (partial design) |
| 88 | +- `docs/docs20250602/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW.md` (HTTP integration) |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +**Detailed Design Found**: |
| 91 | +```elixir |
| 92 | +# Partial GenServer implementation design exists with: |
| 93 | +- Module: ElixirScope.Foundation.Infrastructure.HealthAggregator |
| 94 | +- Health Status: :healthy, :degraded, :unhealthy |
| 95 | +- API Methods: system_health/1, quick_system_health/1 |
| 96 | +- Integration: Periodic polling of registered services via ServiceRegistry |
| 97 | +``` |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +**Missing Implementation Features**: |
| 100 | +- Complete GenServer implementation for health aggregation |
| 101 | +- System health scoring algorithms |
| 102 | +- Deep health checks calling specific service health endpoints |
| 103 | +- Health status caching and historical trending |
| 104 | +- HTTP endpoint exposure via HealthEndpoint module |
| 105 | +- Integration with load balancer health checks |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +**Integration Points** (from docs): |
| 108 | +- Health check logic exists but aggregation service missing |
| 109 | +- HTTP endpoint design: `ElixirScope.Foundation.Infrastructure.HealthEndpoint` |
| 110 | +- Integration with ServiceRegistry for discovering services to health check |
| 111 | +- JSON format health responses for HTTP endpoints |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +--- |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +## 2. AOP Mixins - PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED (50%) |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +### 2.1 ServiceProtection Mixin ✅ (Design Complete) |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +**Status**: Complete design exists in infrastructure.ex but not extracted as standalone module |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +**Documentation References**: |
| 122 | +- `docs/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW/infrastructure.ex` (lines 354-410) |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +**What Exists**: |
| 125 | +```elixir |
| 126 | +# Complete mixin design with: |
| 127 | +defmodule ElixirScope.Foundation.Infrastructure.ServiceProtection do |
| 128 | + # Macro for automatic protection integration |
| 129 | + # @before_compile hook for adding protection methods |
| 130 | + # protected_call/3 for operation protection |
| 131 | + # infrastructure_health_check/0 integration |
| 132 | + # with_infrastructure_protection/2 macro for declarative protection |
| 133 | +end |
| 134 | +``` |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +**Missing Implementation**: |
| 137 | +- Extract as standalone module file |
| 138 | +- Add to actual codebase (currently only in docs) |
| 139 | +- Integration examples and documentation |
| 140 | +- Testing and validation |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +### 2.2 ServiceInstrumentation Mixin ✅ (Design Complete) |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +**Status**: Complete design exists in performance_monitor.ex but not extracted as standalone module |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +**Documentation References**: |
| 147 | +- `docs/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW/infrastructure/performance_monitor.ex` (lines 545-616) |
| 148 | +- `docs/docs20250602/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW.md` (usage examples) |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +**What Exists**: |
| 151 | +```elixir |
| 152 | +# Complete mixin design with: |
| 153 | +defmodule ElixirScope.Foundation.Infrastructure.ServiceInstrumentation do |
| 154 | + # Macro for automatic performance instrumentation |
| 155 | + # @before_compile hook for adding instrumentation |
| 156 | + # Automatic telemetry event emission |
| 157 | + # Performance metric collection integration |
| 158 | +end |
| 159 | +``` |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +**Missing Implementation**: |
| 162 | +- Extract as standalone module file |
| 163 | +- Add to actual codebase (currently only in docs) |
| 164 | +- Integration with PerformanceMonitor service |
| 165 | +- Advanced instrumentation features (sampling, conditional instrumentation) |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +--- |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +## 3. Advanced Health Endpoints - NOT IMPLEMENTED (0%) |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +### 3.1 HTTP Health Endpoint Integration ❌ |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | +**Documentation References**: |
| 174 | +- `docs/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW/infrastructure/health_check.ex` (lines 504-586) |
| 175 | +- `docs/docs20250602/FOUNDATION_OTP_IMPLEMENT_NOW.md` (HTTP integration section) |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +**Missing Features**: |
| 178 | +```elixir |
| 179 | +# Design exists for: |
| 180 | +defmodule ElixirScope.Foundation.Infrastructure.HealthEndpoint do |
| 181 | + # HTTP-compatible health check endpoint integration |
| 182 | + # get_health_json/1 - JSON format for HTTP endpoints |
| 183 | + # get_quick_health/1 - Quick health for load balancer endpoints |
| 184 | + # Integration with HealthAggregator service |
| 185 | +end |
| 186 | +``` |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +**Implementation Requirements**: |
| 189 | +- HTTP endpoint implementation (likely Phoenix or Plug-based) |
| 190 | +- JSON response formatting for health status |
| 191 | +- Quick health checks for load balancers (simple OK/NOT_OK) |
| 192 | +- Deep health checks with detailed service status |
| 193 | +- Integration with external monitoring systems |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +--- |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | +## 4. Implementation Priority and Effort Estimates |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +### Priority 1 - Core Missing Services (High Value) |
| 200 | +1. **PerformanceMonitor Service** - ~3-4 days |
| 201 | + - Critical for production monitoring and alerting |
| 202 | + - Required for performance baseline establishment |
| 203 | + |
| 204 | +2. **MemoryManager Service** - ~2-3 days |
| 205 | + - Important for AST layer memory management |
| 206 | + - Prevents OOM conditions in production |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | +### Priority 2 - Health and Monitoring (Medium Value) |
| 209 | +3. **HealthAggregator Service** - ~2-3 days |
| 210 | + - Completes the health monitoring ecosystem |
| 211 | + - Enables comprehensive system health visibility |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | +4. **HTTP Health Endpoints** - ~1-2 days |
| 214 | + - Required for production deployment and monitoring |
| 215 | + - Integrates with external monitoring systems |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | +### Priority 3 - Developer Experience (Lower Value) |
| 218 | +5. **Extract AOP Mixins** - ~1 day |
| 219 | + - Improves developer ergonomics |
| 220 | + - Enables declarative protection patterns |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | +**Total Estimated Effort**: 9-13 days to achieve 100% implementation |
| 223 | + |
| 224 | +--- |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +## 5. Recommended Implementation Order |
| 227 | + |
| 228 | +1. **PerformanceMonitor Service** - Highest impact, enables monitoring of existing infrastructure |
| 229 | +2. **MemoryManager Service** - Critical for stability, especially with AST layer planned |
| 230 | +3. **HealthAggregator Service** - Completes the monitoring triangle with Performance + Memory |
| 231 | +4. **HTTP Health Endpoints** - Enables production deployment readiness |
| 232 | +5. **Extract AOP Mixins** - Developer experience improvement |
| 233 | + |
| 234 | +--- |
| 235 | + |
| 236 | +## 6. Architecture Decisions Needed |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | +### 6.1 HTTP Framework Choice |
| 239 | +- **Decision Required**: Choose between Phoenix (full framework) vs Plug (lightweight) for health endpoints |
| 240 | +- **Recommendation**: Plug-based for minimal overhead since these are infrastructure endpoints |
| 241 | + |
| 242 | +### 6.2 Metrics Storage |
| 243 | +- **Decision Required**: Choose storage backend for PerformanceMonitor metrics |
| 244 | +- **Options**: ETS (in-memory), external time-series DB, or hybrid approach |
| 245 | +- **Recommendation**: Start with ETS + periodic persistence for simplicity |
| 246 | + |
| 247 | +### 6.3 Memory Management Strategy |
| 248 | +- **Decision Required**: Define memory cleanup strategies and their priorities |
| 249 | +- **Recommendation**: Implement pluggable cleanup behaviours for flexibility |
| 250 | + |
| 251 | +--- |
| 252 | + |
| 253 | +## 7. Success Criteria for 100% Implementation |
| 254 | + |
| 255 | +- [ ] All 3 custom infrastructure services implemented and tested |
| 256 | +- [ ] AOP mixins extracted and integrated into Foundation services |
| 257 | +- [ ] HTTP health endpoints responding correctly |
| 258 | +- [ ] Full telemetry integration across all components |
| 259 | +- [ ] Production-ready monitoring and alerting capabilities |
| 260 | +- [ ] Memory management preventing OOM conditions |
| 261 | +- [ ] Performance baselines and alerting functional |
| 262 | + |
| 263 | +**Target**: Move from 85% → 100% implementation, completing the ElixirScope Foundation Infrastructure layer as a production-ready, enterprise-grade system. |
0 commit comments