Update Semantic-and-Model-Violations-Reference.md (Azure#12199)

Adding secret_property code, update some other codes.

Author: raych1

documentation/Semantic-and-Model-Violations-Reference.md

@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ This document lists the set of automated rules that can be validated against swa
 | [INVALID_RESPONSE_CODE](#INVALID_RESPONSE_CODE) | |
 | [INVALID_RESPONSE_BODY](#INVALID_RESPONSE_BODY) | |
 | [MISSING_REQUIRED_PARAMETER](#MISSING_REQUIRED_PARAMETER) | |
-| [KEYWORD_TYPE_EXPECTED](#KEYWORD_TYPE_EXPECTED) | |
 | [READONLY_PROPERTY_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_REQUEST](#READONLY_PROPERTY_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_REQUEST) | |
 | [SCHEMA_VALIDATION_FAILED](#SCHEMA_VALIDATION_FAILED) | |
+| [SECRET_PROPERTY](#SECRET_PROPERTY) |  |
 | [DISCRIMINATOR_VALUE_NOT_FOUND](#DISCRIMINATOR_VALUE_NOT_FOUND) |  |
 | [DISCRIMINATOR_NOT_REQUIRED](#DISCRIMINATOR_NOT_REQUIRED) | [OAV131](#DISCRIMINATOR_NOT_REQUIRED) |
 | [RESPONSE_BODY_NOT_IN_EXAMPLE](#RESPONSE_BODY_NOT_IN_EXAMPLE) | [OAV130](#RESPONSE_BODY_NOT_IN_EXAMPLE) |
@@ -359,14 +359,6 @@ This document lists the set of automated rules that can be validated against swa
 
 **How to fix the violation**: The error info has the position of swagger, look for the position in swagger and fix the value type of keyword.
 
-### <a name="KEYWORD_TYPE_EXPECTED" />KEYWORD_TYPE_EXPECTED
-
-**Output Message**: Keyword '{0}' is expected to be of type '{1}'.
-
-**Description**: The value of the keyword in swagger should be the specific type.
-
-**How to fix the violation**: Fix the value type of keyword.
-
 ### <a name="PATTERN" />PATTERN
 
 **Output Message**: String does not match pattern {0}: {1}.
@@ -547,9 +539,9 @@ This document lists the set of automated rules that can be validated against swa
 
 **Output Message**: This operation does not have a defined {0} response code.
 
-**Description**: There's extra response code defined in example file.
+**Description**: The specified response code is not defined in example file.
 
-**How to fix the violation**: Remove extra response code definition in example or correct it.
+**How to fix the violation**: Add response code to default, or add response code definition in the swagger.
 
 ### <a name="INVALID_RESPONSE_BODY" />INVALID_RESPONSE_BODY
 
@@ -559,15 +551,6 @@ This document lists the set of automated rules that can be validated against swa
 
 **How to fix the violation**: Add response body.
 
-
-### <a name="KEYWORD_TYPE_EXPECTED" />KEYWORD_TYPE_EXPECTED 
-
-**Output Message**: Keyword 'type' is expected to be of type 'array,boolean,integer,number,null,object,string'.
-
-**Description**: According to Json schema spec, the allowed value for [type](http://json-schema.org/latest/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.6.1.1) is 'array,boolean,integer,number,null,object,string'.
-
-**How to fix the violation**: Set the value of type to one of the values above.
-
 ### <a name="OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES" />OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES 
 
 **Output Message**: Additional properties not allowed:{0}.
@@ -801,6 +784,14 @@ This document lists the set of automated rules that can be validated against swa
 
 **How to fix the violation**: Remove this definition if it's not used.
 
+### <a name="SECRET_PROPERTY" />SECRET_PROPERTY 
+
+**Output Message**: Secret property {0} cannot be sent in the response.
+
+**Description**: The secret is not allowed to return in response when it's annotated with x-ms-secret:true.
+
+**How to fix the violation**: Remove this secret value from the response.
+
 
 ### <a name="ROUNDTRIP_INCONSISTENT_PROPERTY" />ROUNDTRIP_INCONSISTENT_PROPERTY
 
@@ -826,4 +817,4 @@ This document lists the set of automated rules that can be validated against swa
 
 **Description**: The property was not in the PUT request, but it is returned in the subsequent GET response. This implies that the property is read-only or has a default value.
 
-**How to fix the violation**: If the property is a read-only, update the swagger definition for this property to mark it as "readOnly": true. Alternatively, keep the property in the GET schema but remove it from the PUT schema. If the property has a default value, update the Swagger definition for this property to mark it with "default": <default value> annotation.
+**How to fix the violation**: If the property is a read-only, update the swagger definition for this property to mark it as "readOnly": true. Alternatively, keep the property in the GET schema but remove it from the PUT schema. If the property has a default value, update the Swagger definition for this property to mark it with "default": <default value> annotation.