Update index.md

Author: stmassey

index.md

@@ -112,15 +112,13 @@ The following document describes logger enhancements made in MQ V9.0.2 and V9.1.
 #### Performance Impact of COMPMSG on MQ Sender/Receiver Channels
 A short paper evaluating IBM MQ channel compression (COMPMSG) on Sender/Receiver channels across multiple message sizes, assessing compression efficiency with network latency. It compares Baseline, LZ4FAST, and ZLIBFAST, measuring message rate and CPU usage to show when compression improves throughput and when the baseline remains comparable. [COMPMSG.pdf](./PerformanceImpactWithCOMPMSG.pdf
 
-### Performance Report(For Monitoring Queue and Channel , Activity trace, MQ Trace )
+#### Performance Report(For Monitoring Queue and Channel , Activity trace, MQ Trace )
 The report has been prepared using IBM MQ V9.4.3. This report provides insights into
 the overhead on message throughput and CPU utilization when using the techniques
 mentioned below to analyse issues.
-1) Performance of MQ where  Queue and Channel Monitored
-2) Performance of MQ where Activity Trace enabled 
-3) Performance of MQ where MQ Trace enabled [Performance Impact with Trace and Monitoring](./PerfornanceImpactWithActivtyTrace_MQTrace_MonintoringChannelQueue.pdf)
-
-
+1. Performance of MQ where  Queue and Channel Monitored
+2. Performance of MQ where Activity Trace enabled 
+3. Performance of MQ where MQ Trace enabled [Performance Impact with Trace and Monitoring](./PerfornanceImpactWithActivtyTrace_MQTrace_MonintoringChannelQueue.pdf)
 
 
 ### MQ on OpenShift
@@ -138,6 +136,11 @@ This performance whitepaper on OpenShift looks at the performance of Native HA Q
 This performance whitepaper looks at the impact of enabling the additional asynchronous replication to the recovery group. It also shows how your messaging systems can be monitored to determine how your NHA:CRR deployments are performing: [NHACRR performance overhead](./PerformanceTestOnNHACRR.pdf)
 
 
+### MQ on AWS
+Customers have been running MQ workloads in AWS for a long time, and more recently customers have been deploying MQ on OpenShift on AWS via a number of different deployment scenarios.
+The following whitepaper will assist in understanding the performance of SIQM, NHA and NHA:CRR scenarios in that environment: [MQ Performance on AWS](./NHACRRPerformanceTestAWS.pdf).
+
+
 ### MQ for z/OS
 
 Performance reports for the latest versions of IBM MQ for z/OS are available here. 
@@ -198,3 +201,4 @@ You can contact @stmassey and @pharrishur with questions about the MQ Performanc
 
 
 
+