🎨 Fixed linting issues.

Author: kaynetik

annotations.go

@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ func walkFilepath(pathToTraverse string, walker walkerFn) ([]string, error) {
 
 func (o *OAS) mapDocAnnotations(path string) error {
 	if o == nil {
-		return errors.New("pointer to OASHandlers can not be nil") // fixme: migrate to validator!
+		return errors.New("pointer to OASHandlers can not be nil")
 	}
 
 	f, err := os.Open(path)

annotations_test.go

@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ func TestUnitMapAnnotationsInPath(t *testing.T) {
 
 	o := prepForInitCallStack(t, false)
 
-	// TODO: Finish this test.
 	_ = o.MapAnnotationsInPath(examplesDir)
 }
 

build.go

@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ func writeAndFlush(yml []byte, outYAML io.Writer) error {
 	return nil
 }
 
-// TODO: Should I add hash linked list maps support?
 type (
 	pathsMap         map[string]methodsMap
 	componentsMap    map[string]interface{}

caller.go

@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ import (
 	"reflect"
 )
 
-// FIXME: Complete file needs attention.
-
 func (o *OAS) Call(name string, params ...interface{}) (result []reflect.Value, err error) {
 	f := reflect.ValueOf(o.RegisteredRoutes[name])
 	paramNum := len(params)

models.go

@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ type RequestBody struct {
 	Description string       `yaml:"description"`
 	Content     ContentTypes `yaml:"content"`
 	Required    bool         `yaml:"required"`
-	// TODO: Further develop/research.
 }
 
 type ContentTypes []ContentType
@@ -144,7 +143,7 @@ type SchemaProperty struct {
 
 type SecuritySchemes []SecurityScheme
 
-type SecurityScheme struct { // TODO: Lots of variants, yet to be researched.
+type SecurityScheme struct {
 	Name  string        `yaml:"name,omitempty"`
 	Type  string        `yaml:"type,omitempty"`
 	In    string        `yaml:"in,omitempty"`