|
1 | | -"""Adaptive remeshing operators preserving TNFR structural coherence. |
2 | | -
|
3 | | -This module implements REMESH (Recursivity) - the canonical TNFR operator for |
4 | | -fractal pattern propagation and multi-scale structural identity preservation. |
5 | | -
|
6 | | -REMESH enables patterns to echo across scales while maintaining coherence, implementing |
7 | | -the theoretical foundation: "What persists at one scale can be rewritten at another, |
8 | | -with coherence propagating structurally, not imposed." |
9 | | -
|
10 | | -Key capabilities: |
| 1 | +"""Canonical REMESH operator: Recursive pattern propagation preserving structural coherence. |
| 2 | +
|
| 3 | +REMESH (Recursivity) - Glyph: REMESH |
| 4 | +==================================== |
| 5 | +
|
| 6 | +Physical Foundation |
| 7 | +------------------- |
| 8 | +From the nodal equation: ∂EPI/∂t = νf · ΔNFR(t) |
| 9 | +
|
| 10 | +REMESH implements: **EPI(t) ↔ EPI(t-τ)** (operational fractality) |
| 11 | +
|
| 12 | +REMESH enables patterns to echo across temporal and spatial scales while maintaining |
| 13 | +coherence. "What persists at one scale can be rewritten at another, with coherence |
| 14 | +propagating structurally, not imposed." - El pulso que nos atraviesa |
| 15 | +
|
| 16 | +Canonical Physical Behavior |
| 17 | +---------------------------- |
| 18 | +REMESH acts on the nodal equation by creating temporal/spatial coupling: |
| 19 | +
|
| 20 | +1. **Memory Activation**: References EPI(t-τ) from structural history |
| 21 | +2. **Pattern Recognition**: Identifies similar EPIs across network (structural_similarity) |
| 22 | +3. **Coherent Propagation**: Propagates patterns maintaining identity (StructuralIdentity) |
| 23 | +4. **Scale Invariance**: Preserves structural properties across reorganizations |
| 24 | +
|
| 25 | +Effect on nodal components: |
| 26 | +- EPI: Mixed with historical states (EPI_new = (1-α)·EPI_now + α·EPI_past) |
| 27 | +- νf: Can increase during memory activation (reactivation of dormant patterns) |
| 28 | +- ΔNFR: Implicitly calculated from reorganization (ΔNFR = ΔEPI/νf from nodal equation) |
| 29 | +- Phase: Preserved through StructuralIdentity tracking |
| 30 | +
|
| 31 | +Operator Relationships (from Nodal Equation Physics) |
| 32 | +----------------------------------------------------- |
| 33 | +All relationships emerge naturally from how operators affect EPI, νf, ΔNFR, and phase: |
| 34 | +
|
| 35 | +### REMESH Hierarchical (Central Control → Periphery) |
| 36 | +**Physics**: Controlled replication from center maintaining coherence descendente |
| 37 | +
|
| 38 | +1. **IL (Coherence)**: Reduces |ΔNFR| → stabilizes each recursion level |
| 39 | + - Relationship: Estabilización multinivel (coherence extended) |
| 40 | + - Dynamics: REMESH propagates pattern, IL consolidates at each level |
| 41 | + - Sequence: REMESH → IL (recursive propagation → multi-level stabilization) |
| 42 | +
|
| 43 | +2. **VAL (Expansion)**: Increases dim(EPI) → structural expansion |
| 44 | + - Relationship: Expansión estructural coherente (fractal growth) |
| 45 | + - Dynamics: REMESH replicates, VAL expands each replica maintaining form |
| 46 | + - Sequence: VAL → REMESH (expand → replicate expanded form) |
| 47 | +
|
| 48 | +3. **SHA (Silence)**: νf → 0 → latent memory |
| 49 | + - Relationship: Estabilización de red latente (structural memory) |
| 50 | + - Dynamics: SHA freezes pattern (∂EPI/∂t → 0), REMESH propagates frozen state |
| 51 | + - Sequence: SHA → REMESH (freeze → propagate frozen memory) |
| 52 | + - **Critical**: NO functional redundancy - uses existing Silence operator |
| 53 | +
|
| 54 | +4. **NUL (Contraction)**: Reduces dim(EPI) → compression |
| 55 | + - Relationship: Compresión estructural coherente (fractal distillation) |
| 56 | + - Dynamics: Complementary to VAL, reduces dimensionality maintaining identity |
| 57 | + - Sequence: NUL → REMESH (compress → replicate compressed essence) |
| 58 | + - **Note**: Hierarchical simplification preserving core structure |
| 59 | +
|
| 60 | +### REMESH Rhizomatic (Decentralized Propagation) |
| 61 | +**Physics**: Propagation without fixed center, by local resonance |
| 62 | +
|
| 63 | +1. **OZ (Dissonance)**: Increases |ΔNFR| → exploration |
| 64 | + - Relationship: Bifurcación distribuida (distributed bifurcation) |
| 65 | + - Dynamics: REMESH + OZ creates decentralized local variations |
| 66 | + - Sequence: OZ → REMESH (destabilize → replicate variations) |
| 67 | +
|
| 68 | +2. **UM (Coupling)**: φᵢ → φⱼ → structural connection |
| 69 | + - Relationship: Acoplamiento multiescala (multi-scale coupling) |
| 70 | + - Dynamics: REMESH propagates, UM connects replicas without hierarchy |
| 71 | + - Sequence: REMESH → UM (propagate → connect peers) |
| 72 | +
|
| 73 | +3. **THOL (Self-organization)**: Creates sub-EPIs → emergence |
| 74 | + - Relationship: Auto-organización recursiva (recursive self-organization) |
| 75 | + - Dynamics: REMESH + THOL generates emergent structures without center |
| 76 | + - Sequence: THOL → REMESH (emerge sub-EPIs → replicate emergent forms) |
| 77 | +
|
| 78 | +### REMESH Fractal Harmonic (Perfect Self-Similarity) |
| 79 | +**Physics**: Scale-symmetric replication maintaining perfect auto-similitud |
| 80 | +
|
| 81 | +1. **RA (Resonance)**: Amplifies coherently → propagation |
| 82 | + - Relationship: Resonancia multiescala (multi-scale resonance) |
| 83 | + - Dynamics: REMESH replicates, RA amplifies with perfect symmetry |
| 84 | + - Sequence: REMESH → RA (replicate → amplify symmetrically) |
| 85 | +
|
| 86 | +2. **NAV (Transition)**: Activates latent EPI → regime shift |
| 87 | + - Relationship: Transición entre attractores fractales |
| 88 | + - Dynamics: REMESH navigates between self-similar attractor states |
| 89 | + - Sequence: NAV → REMESH (transition → replicate new regime) |
| 90 | +
|
| 91 | +3. **AL (Emission)**: Creates EPI from vacuum → generation |
| 92 | + - Relationship: Emisión fractal (fractal emission) |
| 93 | + - Dynamics: REMESH + AL generates self-similar patterns from origin |
| 94 | + - Sequence: AL → REMESH (emit seed → replicate fractally) |
| 95 | +
|
| 96 | +4. **EN (Reception)**: Updates EPI from network → reception |
| 97 | + - Relationship: Recepción multi-escala simétrica (symmetric multi-scale reception) |
| 98 | + - Dynamics: EN captures patterns from multiple sources → REMESH replicates symmetrically |
| 99 | + - Sequence: EN → REMESH (receive multi-scale → propagate symmetrically) |
| 100 | + - **Note**: Pre-recursion operator that feeds REMESH |
| 101 | +
|
| 102 | +### Operators with Indirect Relationships |
| 103 | +
|
| 104 | +**ZHIR (Mutation)**: Present in canonical relationships but NOT in types |
| 105 | +- **Physical Reason**: ZHIR is a TRANSFORMER that emerges POST-recursion |
| 106 | +- **Dynamics**: REMESH propagates → local variations + destabilizers → ZHIR transforms |
| 107 | +- **Grammar**: Requires IL previo + recent destabilizer (U4b) |
| 108 | +- **Relationship**: Mutación replicativa (replication facilitates mutation) |
| 109 | +- **Conclusion**: Operates AFTER REMESH completes, not during |
| 110 | +
|
| 111 | +Grammar Implications from Physical Analysis |
| 112 | +-------------------------------------------- |
| 113 | +REMESH's physical behavior affects unified grammar rules (UNIFIED_GRAMMAR_RULES.md): |
| 114 | +
|
| 115 | +### U1: STRUCTURAL INITIATION & CLOSURE |
| 116 | +**Physical Basis**: REMESH echoes EPI(t-τ), can activate from dormant/null states |
| 117 | +
|
| 118 | +**U1a (Initiation)**: REMESH is a GENERATOR |
| 119 | +- Can start sequences when operating on latent structure |
| 120 | +- Activates dormant patterns via temporal coupling |
| 121 | +- **Rule**: Sequences can begin with REMESH |
| 122 | +
|
| 123 | +**U1b (Closure)**: REMESH is a CLOSURE operator |
| 124 | +- Distributes structure across scales leaving system in recursive attractor |
| 125 | +- Creates self-sustaining multi-scale coherence |
| 126 | +- **Rule**: Sequences can end with REMESH |
| 127 | +
|
| 128 | +### U2: CONVERGENCE & BOUNDEDNESS |
| 129 | +**Physical Basis**: REMESH mixing with historical states can amplify or dampen ΔNFR |
| 130 | +
|
| 131 | +**Requirement**: REMESH + destabilizers → must include stabilizers |
| 132 | +- Example: REMESH + VAL (expansion) → requires IL (coherence) |
| 133 | +- Prevents: Unbounded growth through recursive expansion |
| 134 | +- **Rule**: If REMESH precedes/follows VAL, OZ, or ZHIR → require IL or THOL |
| 135 | +
|
| 136 | +**Integration Convergence**: ∫ νf · ΔNFR dt must converge |
| 137 | +- REMESH temporal mixing: (1-α)·EPI_now + α·EPI_past |
| 138 | +- Without stabilizers: Can create positive feedback loop |
| 139 | +- **Rule**: Stabilizers ensure convergence of recursive reorganization |
| 140 | +
|
| 141 | +### U3: RESONANT COUPLING |
| 142 | +**Physical Basis**: REMESH propagates patterns - must verify phase compatibility |
| 143 | +
|
| 144 | +**Requirement**: REMESH with UM or RA → verify |φᵢ - φⱼ| ≤ Δφ_max |
| 145 | +- REMESH creates replicas that must be phase-compatible for resonance |
| 146 | +- Antiphase replicas → destructive interference |
| 147 | +- **Rule**: StructuralIdentity.matches() includes phase verification |
| 148 | +- **Implementation**: Phase pattern captured and validated during propagation |
| 149 | +
|
| 150 | +### U4: BIFURCATION DYNAMICS |
| 151 | +**Physical Basis**: REMESH can trigger bifurcation through recursive amplification |
| 152 | +
|
| 153 | +**U4a (Triggers Need Handlers)**: REMESH + destabilizers → need handlers |
| 154 | +- REMESH → THOL sequence: Recursion enables self-organization |
| 155 | +- Must handle emergent sub-EPIs from recursive bifurcation |
| 156 | +- **Rule**: REMESH + OZ or ZHIR → require THOL or IL handlers |
| 157 | +
|
| 158 | +**U4b (Transformers Need Context)**: ZHIR requires REMESH context |
| 159 | +- REMESH creates variations across scales |
| 160 | +- ZHIR then transforms local variations (post-recursion) |
| 161 | +- **Rule**: ZHIR after REMESH → requires prior IL + recent destabilizer |
| 162 | +
|
| 163 | +Centralized Flow - No Redundancy |
| 164 | +--------------------------------- |
| 165 | +This implementation maintains a single, centralized flow: |
| 166 | +
|
| 167 | +1. **SHA Integration**: Uses existing Silence operator from definitions.py |
| 168 | + - NO reimplementation of SHA functionality |
| 169 | + - StructuralIdentity only CAPTURES frozen states, doesn't freeze |
| 170 | + - Workflow: Silence() → capture_from_node(is_sha_frozen=True) → validate |
| 171 | +
|
| 172 | +2. **Coherence Calculation**: Simplified C(t) for REMESH validation |
| 173 | + - Full coherence calculation in tnfr.metrics module |
| 174 | + - compute_global_coherence() specific to REMESH fidelity checks |
| 175 | + - No duplication with main coherence computation |
| 176 | +
|
| 177 | +3. **Pattern Recognition**: Unique to REMESH structural memory |
| 178 | + - structural_similarity(): Pattern matching (no operator overlap) |
| 179 | + - structural_memory_match(): Network-wide search (REMESH-specific) |
| 180 | + - No duplication with network analysis tools |
| 181 | +
|
| 182 | +4. **Identity Tracking**: REMESH-specific fractal identity |
| 183 | + - StructuralIdentity: Persistent identity across reorganizations |
| 184 | + - Captures EPI signature, νf range, phase pattern |
| 185 | + - Validates preservation post-recursion |
| 186 | +
|
| 187 | +Key Capabilities |
| 188 | +---------------- |
11 | 189 | - Structural memory: Pattern recognition across network nodes |
12 | 190 | - Identity preservation: Fractal lineage tracking across reorganizations |
13 | 191 | - Coherence conservation: Validating structural fidelity during remeshing |
14 | 192 | - Multi-modal recursivity: Hierarchical, rhizomatic, and fractal harmonic modes |
| 193 | +- Grammar-compliant: All operations respect unified grammar rules (U1-U4) |
15 | 194 | """ |
16 | 195 |
|
17 | 196 | from __future__ import annotations |
|
0 commit comments