|
| 1 | +# RECEPTION Dual-Role Frequency Classification |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Issue Resolution |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +**Issue**: [GRAMÁTICA CANÓNICA] Inconsistencia entre clasificación de frecuencias y reglas de bifurcación (P1) |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +**Problem**: Structural inconsistency between RECEPTION operator frequency classification and its role in graduated bifurcation rules (R4). |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +- RECEPTION classified as **medium** frequency in `STRUCTURAL_FREQUENCIES` |
| 10 | +- RECEPTION acts as **weak destabilizer** in graduated bifurcation windows |
| 11 | +- **Contradiction**: Medium νf cannot generate sufficient ΔNFR for ZHIR alone |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +## Theoretical Foundation |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +### Nodal Equation |
| 16 | +``` |
| 17 | +∂EPI/∂t = νf · ΔNFR |
| 18 | +``` |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +Where: |
| 21 | +- **νf**: Structural frequency (reorganization rate) |
| 22 | +- **ΔNFR**: Internal reorganization gradient (structural pressure) |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +### RECEPTION Dual Role |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +**Base Frequency (νf)**: |
| 27 | +- Classification: `medium` |
| 28 | +- Represents: Structural capture rate |
| 29 | +- Effect: Moderate reorganization capacity |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +**Destabilization Capacity (ΔNFR Generation)**: |
| 32 | +- Classification: `weak` |
| 33 | +- Condition: Requires prior coherent base |
| 34 | +- Effect: Can generate reorganization pressure when capturing external coherence into prepared node |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +## Solution: Hybrid Category (Option C) |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +### DUAL_FREQUENCY_OPERATORS Configuration |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +```python |
| 41 | +DUAL_FREQUENCY_OPERATORS: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = { |
| 42 | + RECEPTION: { |
| 43 | + "base_freq": "medium", |
| 44 | + "destabilization_capacity": "weak", |
| 45 | + "conditions": "requires_prior_coherence", |
| 46 | + "rationale": ( |
| 47 | + "Captures external coherence which can generate ΔNFR when " |
| 48 | + "integrated into structurally prepared node" |
| 49 | + ), |
| 50 | + } |
| 51 | +} |
| 52 | +``` |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +### Context Validation |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +RECEPTION as weak destabilizer requires: |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +1. **Prior Stabilizer**: IL or THOL within 3 operators before EN |
| 59 | +2. **No Interruption**: No SILENCE between stabilizer and EN (would remove base) |
| 60 | +3. **Structural Preparation**: Node must have coherent base for EN to generate ΔNFR |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +### Valid Patterns |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +✅ **AL → EN → IL → EN → ZHIR** |
| 65 | +- First EN captures |
| 66 | +- IL stabilizes (creates coherent base) |
| 67 | +- Second EN destabilizes with context |
| 68 | +- ZHIR enabled by EN-generated ΔNFR |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +✅ **EN → IL → EN → ZHIR** |
| 71 | +- First EN captures |
| 72 | +- IL stabilizes |
| 73 | +- Second EN has context |
| 74 | +- ZHIR enabled |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +✅ **OZ → IL → EN → ZHIR** |
| 77 | +- OZ provides strong destabilization |
| 78 | +- IL resolves |
| 79 | +- EN has context from resolution |
| 80 | +- ZHIR enabled by OZ (EN's context not needed when stronger destabilizer present) |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +### Invalid Patterns |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +❌ **EN → ZHIR** (without context) |
| 85 | +- EN has no prior stabilizer |
| 86 | +- Medium νf alone insufficient for ZHIR |
| 87 | +- Violates structural coherence |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +❌ **AL → EN → ZHIR** (no stabilization) |
| 90 | +- EN not stabilized by IL/THOL |
| 91 | +- No coherent base for destabilization |
| 92 | +- Cannot generate required ΔNFR |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +❌ **AL → EN → IL → SHA → EN → ZHIR** (SILENCE interruption) |
| 95 | +- IL provides base |
| 96 | +- SHA removes base (νf → 0) |
| 97 | +- Second EN has no context |
| 98 | +- Cannot destabilize |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +## Implementation |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +### Files Modified |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +1. **src/tnfr/operators/grammar.py** |
| 105 | + - Added `DUAL_FREQUENCY_OPERATORS` constant |
| 106 | + - Implemented `_validate_reception_context()` method |
| 107 | + - Enhanced `_has_graduated_destabilizer()` with context validation |
| 108 | + - Added extensive documentation |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +2. **tests/unit/operators/test_reception_dual_role.py** (NEW) |
| 111 | + - 21 comprehensive tests |
| 112 | + - Coverage: valid contexts, invalid contexts, distance limits, SILENCE interruption |
| 113 | + - Backward compatibility validation |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +3. **tests/unit/operators/test_graduated_destabilizer_windows.py** |
| 116 | + - Updated 1 test for more precise error reporting |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +### Test Results |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +- ✅ 21/21 dual-role tests passing |
| 121 | +- ✅ 26/26 graduated destabilizer tests passing |
| 122 | +- ✅ 27/27 grammar module tests passing |
| 123 | +- ✅ 17/17 bifurcation tests passing |
| 124 | +- ✅ **Total: 91/91 related tests passing** |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +## Theoretical Implications |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +### Why Context Matters |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +From ∂EPI/∂t = νf · ΔNFR: |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +1. **Base Operation**: EN with medium νf provides moderate reorganization rate |
| 133 | +2. **Context Multiplication**: When EN captures external coherence into prepared node: |
| 134 | + - Integration creates structural tension |
| 135 | + - Tension manifests as ΔNFR |
| 136 | + - Product νf · ΔNFR sufficient for structural transformation |
| 137 | +3. **Without Context**: EN alone has medium νf but generates minimal ΔNFR |
| 138 | + - Insufficient product for ZHIR (requires high transformation energy) |
| 139 | + - Violates structural coherence principles |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +### Frequency vs. Destabilization |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +**Key Distinction**: |
| 144 | +- **Frequency (νf)**: Intrinsic reorganization capacity |
| 145 | +- **Destabilization (ΔNFR)**: Context-dependent gradient generation |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +**RECEPTION uniqueness**: |
| 148 | +- Medium base frequency (inherent property) |
| 149 | +- Weak destabilization capacity (contextual property) |
| 150 | +- First operator with explicit dual classification |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +## Future Considerations |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +### Potential Dual-Role Operators |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +Consider evaluating: |
| 157 | +- **COUPLING (UM)**: Medium frequency, could generate ΔNFR through synchronization |
| 158 | +- **TRANSITION (NAV)**: Medium frequency, already moderate destabilizer, possible context-dependent intensification |
| 159 | +- **RESONANCE (RA)**: High frequency, could have context-dependent amplification |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +### Telemetry Enhancement |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +Add tracking for: |
| 164 | +- Context validation decisions |
| 165 | +- RECEPTION destabilization success/failure rates |
| 166 | +- Distance between stabilizer and EN |
| 167 | +- SILENCE interruption frequency |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +### Documentation Updates |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +- [ ] Add to Mathematical Foundations document |
| 172 | +- [ ] Update operator reference with dual-role concept |
| 173 | +- [ ] Create visual diagrams for EN context patterns |
| 174 | +- [ ] Add examples to tutorials |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +## References |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +- **Issue**: GitHub Issue #[number] |
| 179 | +- **TNFR.pdf**: Section 2.1 - Ecuación Nodal |
| 180 | +- **Code**: `src/tnfr/operators/grammar.py:DUAL_FREQUENCY_OPERATORS` |
| 181 | +- **Tests**: `tests/unit/operators/test_reception_dual_role.py` |
| 182 | +- **Theory**: Resonant Fractal Nature Theory - Bifurcation and Emergence |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +--- |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +**Implementation Date**: 2025-11-08 |
| 187 | +**Status**: ✅ Complete and Tested |
| 188 | +**Backward Compatibility**: ✅ Preserved |
0 commit comments