|
| 1 | +# U6 Temporal Ordering: Investigation Report |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Investigation Date:** 2025-11-10 |
| 4 | +**Status:** DEFER IMPLEMENTATION - Document as Research Proposal |
| 5 | +**Canonicity Assessment:** MODERATE (40% confidence) |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +--- |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## Executive Summary |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +This report documents a comprehensive investigation into whether **U6: Temporal Ordering** should be added to the canonical TNFR grammar alongside existing constraints U1-U5. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +**Key Finding:** U6 has strong physical motivation and identifies real gaps in U1-U5, but lacks the mathematical inevitability required for canonical status. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +**Decision:** Defer implementation while documenting thoroughly as a research proposal in UNIFIED_GRAMMAR_RULES.md. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +--- |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +## Key Results |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +### Gap Analysis |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +U6 identifies sequences that pass U1-U5 but may be problematic: |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +| Test Case | U1-U5 | U6 | Gap? | |
| 26 | +|-----------|-------|-----|------| |
| 27 | +| Consecutive OZ | ✓ Pass | ✗ Fail | Yes | |
| 28 | +| OZ→ZHIR immediate | ✓ Pass | ✗ Fail | Yes | |
| 29 | +| Triple destabilizers | ✓ Pass | ✗ Fail | Yes | |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +**Coverage:** 5/6 test cases showed gaps (83% improvement) |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +### Canonicity Assessment |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +| Criterion | Status | |
| 36 | +|-----------|--------| |
| 37 | +| Derives from nodal equation | ✗ FAIL | |
| 38 | +| Prevents impossible sequences | ✓ PASS | |
| 39 | +| Universal across domains | ✗ FAIL | |
| 40 | +| No empirical tuning | ✗ FAIL | |
| 41 | +| Independent from U1-U5 | ✓ PASS | |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +**Score:** 2/5 → MODERATE canonicity (40%) |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +--- |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +## Decision Rationale |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +**Aligned with TNFR Philosophy:** |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +1. **"Physics First"** - Need complete derivation from nodal equation |
| 52 | +2. **"No Arbitrary Choices"** - α parameter requires tuning (0.5-0.9) |
| 53 | +3. **"Reproducibility Always"** - Empirical validation pending |
| 54 | +4. **"Coherence Over Convenience"** - Don't add rules prematurely |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +--- |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +## Path Forward |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +### Documentation Added |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +- **Location:** `UNIFIED_GRAMMAR_RULES.md` § "Proposed Constraints Under Research" |
| 63 | +- Complete U6 specification with physical motivation |
| 64 | +- Research roadmap for elevation to STRONG |
| 65 | +- Timeline estimate: 6-12 months |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +### Research Needed |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +**HIGH Priority:** |
| 70 | +1. Computational validation (measure actual τ_relax) |
| 71 | +2. Theoretical derivation from nodal equation |
| 72 | +3. Determine α from first principles |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +**MEDIUM Priority:** |
| 75 | +4. Cross-domain validation |
| 76 | +5. Alternative formulations |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +**Success Criteria:** |
| 79 | +- >80% of U6 violations cause coherence loss |
| 80 | +- Derivation from nodal equation |
| 81 | +- α determinable without tuning |
| 82 | +- Works across 3+ domains |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +--- |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +## Conclusion |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +U6 is a **well-motivated research proposal** with strong physical analogies but insufficient mathematical inevitability for canonical inclusion. |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +**Better to document openly as research than to weaken canonical standards.** |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +--- |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +**Full analysis:** See UNIFIED_GRAMMAR_RULES.md § Proposed Constraints |
| 95 | +**Test artifacts:** `/tmp/test_u6_necessity_v2.py` |
| 96 | +**Date:** 2025-11-10 |
0 commit comments