Skip to content

Conversation

@ascalotoru
Copy link

Summary

This PR adds optional support for Traefik by introducing a new IngressRoute template.
Charts can now render either a standard Kubernetes Ingress or a Traefik IngressRoute, depending on configuration.

Key Changes

Added ingress_route.yaml to render a traefik.io/v1alpha1 IngressRoute when ingress.traefik.enabled = true.

Updated ingress.yaml to render only when Traefik is disabled.

Extended values.yaml with:

ingress.traefik.enabled
ingress.traefik.entryPoint

Added fallback logic for service name and port, with clear failures when missing.

Why

Allows deployments using Traefik to work natively with its CRDs while keeping full backward compatibility for environments using standard Ingress controllers.

Compatibility

No breaking changes.

Existing setups using NGINX or other Ingress controllers continue working without modifications.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

🗂️ Base branches to auto review (1)
  • api_*

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ascalotoru ascalotoru force-pushed the feature/traefik-support branch 2 times, most recently from e633fa5 to f4426fa Compare December 1, 2025 15:49
@ascalotoru ascalotoru force-pushed the feature/traefik-support branch from f4426fa to 714ce17 Compare December 1, 2025 16:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant